Suppr超能文献

飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术后眼反应分析仪角膜补偿眼压与Corvis ST生物力学眼压的一致性

Agreement of ocular response analyzer cornea compensated IOP with corvis ST biomechanical IOP following Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK.

作者信息

Salouti Ramin, Razeghinejad Reza, Eslami Gholamreza, Zare Mousa, Salouti Kia, Ghoreyshi Maryam, Nowroozzadeh M Hossein

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Salouti Cornea Research Center, Salouti Eye Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2023 Feb;37(2):263-266. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01928-w. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement by ORA-IOPcc and Corvis-bIOP after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 56 eyes from 56 consecutive patients scheduled for FS-LASIK were enrolled. All patients had IOP measurement with ORA and Corvis ST by two blinded independent expert examiners. IOP examinations were conducted between 8 and 11 A.M. Data were collected at baseline and 3 months after FS-LASIK.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 29.1 ± 6.3 years, and 42 (75%) were female. The average of central corneal thickness (CCT) decreased from 537 ± 23 µm at baseline to 458 ± 31 µm after FS-LASIK. The mean postoperative change of IOP was 0.0 ± 2.1 for bIOP and -2.5 ± 3.2 mmHg for IOPcc. The corresponding 95% limits of agreement (LoA) was -4.1 to 4.1 mmHg and -3.8 to 8.8 mmHg, respectively. Both methods showed no significant correlation between ∆IOP and ∆CCT. The 95% LoA between bIOP and IOPcc after FS-LASIK was -4.8 to 9.1 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the ORA-IOPcc, the Corvis-bIOP showed less variation after FS-LASIK and might be a more appropriate choice for measuring IOP in this condition. The agreement of bIOP vs. IOPcc after FS-LASIK is below the clinically acceptable level, and the two methods could not be regarded as interchangeable.

摘要

目的

比较飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)后通过ORA-IOPcc和Corvis-bIOP测量眼内压(IOP)的情况。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,纳入了56例计划接受FS-LASIK的连续患者的56只眼。所有患者均由两名独立的盲法专家检查者使用ORA和Corvis ST测量IOP。IOP检查在上午8点至11点之间进行。在基线和FS-LASIK术后3个月收集数据。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为29.1±6.3岁,其中42例(75%)为女性。中央角膜厚度(CCT)的平均值从基线时的537±23μm降至FS-LASIK术后的458±31μm。bIOP的术后IOP平均变化为0.0±2.1,IOPcc为-2.5±3.2mmHg。相应的95%一致性界限(LoA)分别为-4.1至4.1mmHg和-3.8至8.8mmHg。两种方法均显示∆IOP与∆CCT之间无显著相关性。FS-LASIK术后bIOP与IOPcc之间的95%LoA为-4.8至9.1mmHg。

结论

与ORA-IOPcc相比,Corvis-bIOP在FS-LASIK术后的变化较小,可能是在这种情况下测量IOP的更合适选择。FS-LASIK术后bIOP与IOPcc的一致性低于临床可接受水平,这两种方法不能视为可互换的。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验