• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 LASIK 和 F-SMILE 手术后角膜生物力学变化与 CorVis ST 的差异。

Comparison of corneal biomechanical changes after LASIK and F-SMILE with CorVis ST.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;31(4):1762-1770. doi: 10.1177/1120672120945664. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1177/1120672120945664
PMID:32698618
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate changes in corneal biomechanics after LASIK and F-SMILE.

SETTING

Elite Eye Center, Tanta, Egypt.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, unmasked, interventional comparative case series.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 60 eyes were equally divided into two groups; group A: received LASIK and group B: received F-SMILE. Pentacam and CorVis ST parameters were compared before and 6 months after procedures.  ⩽ 0.05 was used for significance of results.

RESULTS

bIOP decreased by 0.762 ± 1.211 mmHg in group A ( = 0.092), and by 2.52 ± 1.389 mmHg in group B ( < 0.001) and the difference between groups became significant ( = 0.001). A1 increased significantly in group A only ( = 0.036); while A2 decreased insignificantly in both groups. DAR increased significantly in both groups ( < 0.001,  = 0.022), but the difference between groups remained insignificant ( = 0.461). IR increased significantly in group A only ( < 0.001) and the difference between groups became significant ( = 0.026). ARTH decreased in both groups ( = 0.245,  = 0.695) and the difference remained insignificant ( = 0.928). SP-A1 decreased in group A by 8.89 ± 1.38 mmHg/mm ( = 0.637), and by 32.6 ± 4.39 mmHg/mm in group B ( < 0.001) and the postoperative difference between groups was significant ( = 0.013). CBI increased significantly in group A ( < 0.001), but insignificantly in group B ( = 0.098) and postoperative difference between groups was highly significant ( < 0.001). A significant correlation was found between change in CCT and corresponding changes in DAR, IR, and ARTH after surgery in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The significant differences between groups postoperatively as regards bIOP ( = 0.001), IR ( = 0.026), SP-A1 ( = 0.013), and CBI ( < 0.001) indicate stiffer corneas after F-SMILE and suggest less influence on corneal biomechanics than LASIK.

摘要

目的

评估 LASIK 和 F-SMILE 术后角膜生物力学的变化。

设置

埃及坦塔精英眼科中心。

设计

前瞻性、随机、非盲、干预性病例对照系列研究。

患者和方法

共有 60 只眼平均分为两组;A 组:接受 LASIK,B 组:接受 F-SMILE。比较术前和术后 6 个月 Pentacam 和 CorVis ST 参数。结果以 P ⩽ 0.05 为有统计学意义。

结果

A 组 bIOP 降低 0.762 ± 1.211 mmHg(= 0.092),B 组降低 2.52 ± 1.389 mmHg(< 0.001),两组间差异有统计学意义(= 0.001)。A 组仅 A1 显著增加(= 0.036);两组 A2 均无显著变化。两组 DAR 均显著增加(均< 0.001,= 0.022),但两组间差异无统计学意义(= 0.461)。A 组仅 IR 显著增加(< 0.001),两组间差异有统计学意义(= 0.026)。两组 ARTH 均降低(= 0.245,= 0.695),差异无统计学意义(= 0.928)。A 组 SP-A1 降低 8.89 ± 1.38 mmHg/mm(= 0.637),B 组降低 32.6 ± 4.39 mmHg/mm(< 0.001),术后两组间差异有统计学意义(= 0.013)。A 组 CBI 显著增加(< 0.001),B 组无显著增加(= 0.098),两组间术后差异有高度统计学意义(< 0.001)。两组术后 CCT 变化与 DAR、IR 和 ARTH 相应变化呈显著相关性。

结论

术后两组间 bIOP(= 0.001)、IR(= 0.026)、SP-A1(= 0.013)和 CBI(< 0.001)差异有统计学意义,表明 F-SMILE 后角膜硬度增加,对角膜生物力学的影响小于 LASIK。

相似文献

1
Comparison of corneal biomechanical changes after LASIK and F-SMILE with CorVis ST.比较 LASIK 和 F-SMILE 手术后角膜生物力学变化与 CorVis ST 的差异。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;31(4):1762-1770. doi: 10.1177/1120672120945664. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
2
Evaluation of Changes in Human Corneas After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Non-Contact Tonometry and Ultra-High-Speed Camera (Corvis ST).使用非接触眼压计和超高速相机(Corvis ST)评估飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)和小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)后人类角膜的变化。
Curr Eye Res. 2016 Jul;41(7):917-22. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1082185. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
3
Comparison of Corneal Biomechanics Treated With Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction by New Corneal Biomechanical Parameters of Corvis ST II.应用 Corvis ST II 新型角膜生物力学参数比较飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术和小切口微透镜取出术治疗的角膜生物力学
Cornea. 2023 Nov 1;42(11):1384-1390. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003191. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
A comparative and prospective study of corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK performed on the contralateral eyes of high myopia patients.对高度近视患者对侧眼进行飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)后角膜生物力学的比较性前瞻性研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jul;10(13):730. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-330.
5
Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).在微小切口透镜取出术 (SMILE) 和飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术 (FS-LASIK) 中角膜生物力学的变化。
Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Apr;35(3):599-609. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02854-w. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
6
Postoperative corneal biomechanics and influencing factors during femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for high myopia.飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)和激光辅助上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗高度近视术后角膜生物力学及其影响因素。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Oct;36(8):1709-1717. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03320-2. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
7
Corneal Biomechanical Changes and Tissue Remodeling After SMILE and LASIK.飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)和准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)术后角膜生物力学变化及组织重塑
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Nov 1;58(13):5703-5712. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22864.
8
Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry.基于Scheimpflug动态眼压测量法评估准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)、角膜基质透镜切除术(ReLEx flex)和全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(ReLEx smile)后的角膜生物力学特性
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;252(8):1329-35. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2667-6. Epub 2014 May 27.
9
Evaluation of the Difference between Predicted and Measured Central Corneal Thickness Reduction after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.评估 SMILE 和飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 治疗近视后中央角膜厚度预测值与实际值的差异。
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Aug;46(8):1089-1095. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1877310. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
10
Comparison of Corneal Biological Healing After Femtosecond LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Procedure.飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术与小切口基质透镜切除术角膜生物愈合情况的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2016 Sep;41(9):1202-8. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1107590. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative and Prospective Study of Corneal Consumption and Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK Performed on the Contralateral Eyes With High Myopic Astigmatism.高度近视散光患者双眼行 SMILE 与 FS-LASIK 术后角膜消耗与角膜生物力学的对比前瞻性研究
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 4;13(11):29. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.11.29.
2
Comparison of different correction formulas and measurement methods for the accurate determination of intraocular pressure after SMILE and FS-LASIK surgery.比较 SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 手术后准确测量眼压的不同矫正公式和测量方法。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 10;22(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02620-7.
3
A comparative and prospective study of corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK performed on the contralateral eyes of high myopia patients.
对高度近视患者对侧眼进行飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)后角膜生物力学的比较性前瞻性研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jul;10(13):730. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-330.
4
Short and long term corneal biomechanical analysis after overnight orthokeratology.夜间角膜塑形术后的短期和长期角膜生物力学分析
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 18;15(7):1128-1134. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.07.13. eCollection 2022.
5
Agreement of ocular response analyzer cornea compensated IOP with corvis ST biomechanical IOP following Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK.飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术后眼反应分析仪角膜补偿眼压与Corvis ST生物力学眼压的一致性
Eye (Lond). 2023 Feb;37(2):263-266. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01928-w. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Commentary: Corneal biomechanical assessment following refractive surgery: Past, present, and future.述评:屈光手术后的角膜生物力学评估:过去、现在与未来
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct;69(10):2656-2657. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1569_21.