Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, UK; School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, UK.
School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, UK.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Oct;133:107178. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107178. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
Executive control impairments in aphasia resulting from frontal lesions are expected, given that integrity of frontal regions is critical to executive control task performance. Yet the consistency of executive control impairments in aphasia is poorly understood. This is due to previous studies using only a brief set of measures or failing to account for the high language processing demands of many executive control tasks. This study investigated performance across a series of specific and broad executive control task, whilst comparing differences between low or high verbal task versions. Ten participants with aphasia secondary to left inferior frontal lesions and fifteen age matched controls completed a battery of verbal and low verbal executive control tasks tapping into the three core domains of inhibiting, switching, and updating of working memory. For both controls and participants with aphasia, there was no consistent influence of verbal load on either reaction time or accuracy performance. When compared to controls, participants with aphasia demonstrate a general slowing of responses across all reaction time tasks, and are less accurate on switching and updating tasks. These findings do suggest that language processing is not essential for executive control task performance, given that verbal load does not matter. Furthermore, tasks which involve holding multiple sources of information in mind, such as during switching or updating, are particularly vulnerable in aphasia.
鉴于额叶区域的完整性对于执行控制任务的表现至关重要,因此预计额叶病变引起的失语症患者会出现执行控制障碍。然而,失语症患者执行控制障碍的一致性仍不清楚。这是由于之前的研究仅使用了简短的一系列措施,或者没有考虑到许多执行控制任务对语言处理的高要求。本研究通过比较低语言任务和高语言任务版本之间的差异,调查了一系列特定和广泛的执行控制任务的表现。10 名因左额下回病变导致失语症的参与者和 15 名年龄匹配的对照组完成了一系列口头和低口头执行控制任务,这些任务涉及抑制、转换和工作记忆更新这三个核心领域。对于对照组和失语症患者,语言负荷对反应时间或准确性表现都没有一致的影响。与对照组相比,失语症患者在所有反应时间任务中反应速度普遍较慢,在转换和更新任务中的准确性较低。这些发现表明,语言处理对于执行控制任务的表现并不是必不可少的,因为语言负荷并不重要。此外,需要在头脑中记住多个信息源的任务,例如在转换或更新过程中,在失语症中特别容易受到影响。