• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体上的“非自愿独身者”活动与当地交配生态有关。

Incel Activity on Social Media Linked to Local Mating Ecology.

机构信息

Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, University of New South Wales.

Melbourne Data Analytics Platform, The University of Melbourne.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2022 Feb;33(2):249-258. doi: 10.1177/09567976211036065. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1177/09567976211036065
PMID:35015599
Abstract

Young men with few prospects of attracting a mate have historically threatened the internal peace and stability of societies. In some contemporary societies, such involuntary celibate-or -men promote much online misogyny and perpetrate real-world violence. We tested the prediction that online incel activity arises via local real-world mating-market forces that affect relationship formation. From a database of 4 billion Twitter posts (2012-2018), we geolocated 321 million tweets to 582 commuting zones in the continental United States, of which 3,649 tweets used words peculiar to incels and 3,745 were about incels. We show that such tweets arise disproportionately within places where mating competition among men is likely to be high because of male-biased sex ratios, few single women, high income inequality, and small gender gaps in income. Our results suggest a role for social media in monitoring and mitigating factors that lead young men toward antisocial behavior in real-world societies.

摘要

历史上,那些鲜有机会吸引伴侣的年轻男性曾威胁到社会的内部和平与稳定。在一些当代社会中,这种被迫单身的男性在网络上煽动厌女情绪,并在现实世界中实施暴力。我们验证了一个假设,即网络上的独身主义者的活动是通过影响人际关系形成的当地现实世界的婚配市场力量产生的。我们从一个包含 40 亿条推文(2012-2018 年)的数据库中,将 3.21 亿条推文定位到美国大陆的 582 个通勤区,其中 3649 条推文使用了独身主义者特有的词语,而 3745 条推文则是关于独身主义者的。我们表明,由于男性偏多的性别比例、单身女性较少、收入不平等程度高以及性别收入差距较小,这些推文在男性之间婚配竞争可能很高的地方不成比例地出现。我们的研究结果表明,社交媒体在监测和缓解导致年轻男性在现实社会中产生反社会行为的因素方面发挥着作用。

相似文献

1
Incel Activity on Social Media Linked to Local Mating Ecology.社交媒体上的“非自愿独身者”活动与当地交配生态有关。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Feb;33(2):249-258. doi: 10.1177/09567976211036065. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Involuntary Celibacy: A Review of Incel Ideology and Experiences with Dating, Rejection, and Associated Mental Health and Emotional Sequelae.非自愿独身:对独身意识形态的回顾,以及与约会、拒绝相关的经历,以及由此产生的心理健康和情绪后果。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022 Dec;24(12):731-740. doi: 10.1007/s11920-022-01382-9. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
3
An Exploration of the Involuntary Celibate (Incel) Subculture Online.探索网络上的独身(Incel)亚文化。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP4981-NP5008. doi: 10.1177/0886260520959625. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
4
Societies should not ignore their incel problem.社会不应忽视其“非自愿独身者”问题。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Feb;27(2):111-113. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.11.007. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
5
One is the loneliest number: Involuntary celibacy (incel), mental health, and loneliness.一乃最孤独之数:非自愿独身(非自愿独身者)、心理健康与孤独感
Curr Psychol. 2023 Feb 2:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z.
6
Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence, Hate Speech, and Terrorism: A Risk Assessment on the Rise of the Incel Rebellion in Canada.技术助长的基于性别的暴力、仇恨言论和恐怖主义:对加拿大“厌女症”叛乱抬头风险的评估。
Violence Against Women. 2023 Jul;29(9):1687-1718. doi: 10.1177/10778012221125495. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
7
The Mating Psychology of Incels (Involuntary Celibates): Misfortunes, Misperceptions, and Misrepresentations.《处男情结(自愿独身者)的交配心理学》:不幸、误解和歪曲。
J Sex Res. 2024 Sep;61(7):989-1000. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2023.2248096. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
8
The Black Pill: New Technology and the Male Supremacy of Involuntarily Celibate Men.“黑丸”:新技术与非自愿独身男性的男性至上主义
Men Masc. 2021 Dec;24(5):823-841. doi: 10.1177/1097184X211017954. Epub 2021 May 18.
9
From Reddit to manifestos: Forensic evaluation of incel online activity.从 Reddit 到宣言:对“非自愿独身者”在线活动的法医评估。
Behav Sci Law. 2024 Mar-Apr;42(2):115-129. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2648. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
10
The Angry Echo Chamber: A Study of Extremist and Emotional Language Changes in Incel Communities Over Time.愤怒回音室:关于时间推移中“处男情结”群体中极端和情绪化语言变化的研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Nov;39(21-22):4573-4597. doi: 10.1177/08862605241239451. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dual Pathways Hypothesis of Incel Harm: A Model of Harmful Attitudes and Beliefs Among Involuntary Celibates.非自愿独身者伤害的双途径假说:非自愿独身者有害态度和信念的模型
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03161-y.
2
From Privilege to Threat: Unraveling Psychological Pathways to the Manosphere.从特权到威胁:解析通往男性领域的心理路径。
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Apr;54(4):1325-1340. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03114-5. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
3
Sex Differences in Perception of Economic and Dating Access.经济与约会机会认知中的性别差异。
Evol Psychol. 2025 Jan-Mar;23(1):14747049241310154. doi: 10.1177/14747049241310154.
4
The Relationship Between Face-Based First Impressions and Perceptions of Purity and Compared to Other Moral Violations.基于面部的第一印象与纯洁感认知之间的关系以及与其他道德违规行为的比较。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 16;14(12):1205. doi: 10.3390/bs14121205.
5
Sex ratios and gender norms: why both are needed to understand sexual conflict in humans.性别比例与性别规范:为何两者对于理解人类的性冲突均不可或缺。
Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Jan 30;6:e10. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.3. eCollection 2024.
6
A new variation of modern prejudice: young Korean men's anti-feminism and male-victim ideology.现代偏见的一种新变体:韩国年轻男性的反女权主义和男性受害者意识形态。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 20;14:1230577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1230577. eCollection 2023.
7
The psychology of relative state, desperation and violence: a commentary on de Courson (2023).相对状态、绝望与暴力的心理学:对德库尔森(2023年)的评论
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Oct 11;290(2008):20231595. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1595.
8
Gendered conflict in the human family.人类家庭中的性别冲突。
Evol Hum Sci. 2023 Apr 24;5:e12. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2023.8. eCollection 2023.
9
Involuntary Celibacy: A Review of Incel Ideology and Experiences with Dating, Rejection, and Associated Mental Health and Emotional Sequelae.非自愿独身:对独身意识形态的回顾,以及与约会、拒绝相关的经历,以及由此产生的心理健康和情绪后果。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022 Dec;24(12):731-740. doi: 10.1007/s11920-022-01382-9. Epub 2022 Nov 17.