Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Neuron. 2022 Mar 2;110(5):749-769. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.015. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
Somatosensory afferents are traditionally classified by soma size, myelination, and their response specificity to external and internal stimuli. Here, we propose the functional subdivision of the nociceptive somatosensory system into two branches. The exteroceptive branch detects external threats and drives reflexive-defensive reactions to prevent or limit injury. The interoceptive branch senses the disruption of body integrity, produces tonic pain with strong aversive emotional components, and drives self-caring responses toward to the injured region to reduce suffering. The central thesis behind this functional subdivision comes from a reflection on the dilemma faced by the pain research field, namely, the use of reflexive-defensive behaviors as surrogate assays for interoceptive tonic pain. The interpretation of these assays is now being challenged by the discovery of distinct but interwoven circuits that drive exteroceptive versus interoceptive types of behaviors, with the conflation of these two components contributing partially to the poor translation of therapies from preclinical studies.
躯体感觉传入纤维传统上根据躯体大小、髓鞘形成和对外部和内部刺激的反应特异性进行分类。在这里,我们提出将伤害感受性躯体感觉系统分为两个分支的功能细分。外感受分支检测外部威胁,并驱动反射性防御反应以防止或限制伤害。内感受分支感知身体完整性的破坏,产生具有强烈厌恶情绪成分的持续性疼痛,并驱动向受伤区域的自我护理反应以减轻痛苦。这种功能细分的核心论点来自对疼痛研究领域所面临困境的反思,即使用反射性防御行为作为内感受持续性疼痛的替代检测方法。这些检测方法的解释现在受到发现驱动外感受和内感受类型行为的不同但交织的回路的挑战,这两个成分的混淆部分导致从临床前研究到治疗的转化效果不佳。