Suppr超能文献

比较不同制造商销售的不锈钢和陶瓷正畸托槽0.022英寸槽沟的精度。

To Compare the Accuracy of 0.022 Inch Slot of Stainless Steel and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets Marketed by Different Manufacturers.

作者信息

Divya Perumallapalli, Banswada Santosh Reddy, Kukunuru Shilpa Reddy, Kavya Keerthi B, Rathod R Ravi, Polavarapu Keerthi Chowdary

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Telangana, India.

Department of Orthodontics, AME'S Dental College and Hospital, Riachur, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1037-S1041. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_295_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of the present study was to analyze the accuracy of 0.022 inch slot of stainless steel and ceramic orthodontic brackets marketed by different manufacturers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An study was done on upper left central incisor bracket of MBT 0.022 slot of American orthodontics (AO), 3M Unitek, Ormco with each 20 of stainless steel and ceramic brackets divided into six groups, and the total sample was 120. The brackets were scanned with stereo microscope of Magnus Company and Image Pro plus analysis software was used to evaluate the mesial face and base, distal face and base.

RESULTS

Comparison in between the groups of stainless steel showed that 3M Unitek brackets showed higher slot widths as compared to AO and Ormco which was statistically significant ( < 0.05). Comparison in between the groups of ceramic brackets of AO brackets showed higher slot widths as compared to Ormco and 3M Unitek ceramic brackets which was statistically significant ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

By this study, there was a difference between stated values and measured values of brackets displaying inaccuracies in dimension. A clear impreciseness about the appliance could be needed during the finishing and detailing stage to avoid loss of torque control due to slot oversize and the divergence of slot walls.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在分析不同制造商销售的不锈钢和陶瓷正畸托槽0.022英寸槽沟的精度。

材料与方法

对美国正畸公司(AO)、3M Unitek、奥美科的MBT 0.022槽沟左上中切牙托槽进行研究,每种材质的不锈钢和陶瓷托槽各20个,分为六组,样本总数为120个。使用马格努斯公司的立体显微镜对托槽进行扫描,并使用Image Pro plus分析软件评估近中面与基部、远中面与基部。

结果

不锈钢托槽组之间的比较显示,3M Unitek托槽的槽沟宽度比AO和奥美科的更高,具有统计学意义(<0.05)。AO陶瓷托槽组与奥美科和3M Unitek陶瓷托槽组相比,AO陶瓷托槽的槽沟宽度更高,具有统计学意义(<0.05)。

结论

通过本研究,托槽的标称值与测量值之间存在差异,显示出尺寸不准确。在精整和细节处理阶段可能需要明确矫治器的不精确性,以避免由于槽沟过大和槽沟壁的差异而导致转矩控制丧失。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b29/8687023/d751ba0fcd9d/JPBS-13-1037-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验