• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单音节词表用于言语测听测试:编制、内容验证和等价性研究。

Lists of monosyllables for logoaudiometric tests: elaboration, content validation and search for equivalence.

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM - Santa Maria (RS), Brasil.

Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - UFCSPA - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.

出版信息

Codas. 2022 Jan 7;34(3):e20210057. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021057. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20212021057
PMID:35019086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9851190/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Develop new lists of monosyllables for conducting logoaudiometric tests in Portuguese, perform content validation, considering ear side and education and check the equivalence between the lists.

METHODS

Were selected 125 monosyllables with different syllabic structures, which were submitted to the content validation process, which included judgment on familiarity, organization of lists, recording of material and auditory recognition. After content validation, the monosyllable lists were subjected to equivalence research, in order to obtain evidence of reliability for the proposed test instrument.

RESULTS

Five lists with 25 monosyllables were elaborated and analyzed for content, of these, four lists were validated. There was no statistically significant difference between the responses obtained in the right and left ears. The education of the subjects did not influence the recognition of words. As for the equivalence search, it was found that two lists were equivalent, one not equivalent, but similar and one list was different from the others, and then excluded.

CONCLUSION

Two monosyllable lists were validated for content and considered equivalent, with the same level of difficulty between them, and one list was considered similar, which can be used as training to apply the test on the audiological battery. The validated lists were not influenced by ear and education.

摘要

目的

开发新的葡萄牙语单音节词列表,用于进行语音听力测试,进行内容验证,考虑耳侧和教育因素,并检查列表之间的等价性。

方法

选择了 125 个具有不同音节结构的单音节词,提交给内容验证过程,包括对熟悉度、列表组织、材料记录和听觉识别的判断。内容验证后,对单音节词列表进行了等价性研究,以获得所提出的测试仪器的可靠性证据。

结果

共编制和分析了 5 个包含 25 个单音节词的列表,其中 4 个列表得到了验证。右耳和左耳的反应没有统计学上的显著差异。受试者的教育程度不影响单词的识别。关于等价性搜索,发现两个列表是等价的,一个列表不等价,但相似,另一个列表与其他列表不同,因此被排除。

结论

对内容进行了验证,并认为两个单音节词列表是等价的,它们之间具有相同的难度水平,还有一个列表被认为是相似的,可以作为测试听觉电池的训练使用。验证的列表不受耳朵和教育的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2bf/9851190/28a86762f2b8/codas-34-3-e20210057-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2bf/9851190/9a0f0e669166/codas-34-3-e20210057-g01-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2bf/9851190/28a86762f2b8/codas-34-3-e20210057-g02-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2bf/9851190/2f089fdf8d20/codas-34-3-e20210057-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2bf/9851190/28a86762f2b8/codas-34-3-e20210057-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2bf/9851190/9a0f0e669166/codas-34-3-e20210057-g01-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2bf/9851190/28a86762f2b8/codas-34-3-e20210057-g02-en.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2bf/9851190/2f089fdf8d20/codas-34-3-e20210057-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2bf/9851190/28a86762f2b8/codas-34-3-e20210057-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
Lists of monosyllables for logoaudiometric tests: elaboration, content validation and search for equivalence.单音节词表用于言语测听测试:编制、内容验证和等价性研究。
Codas. 2022 Jan 7;34(3):e20210057. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021057. eCollection 2022.
2
Development of a mandarin monosyllable recognition test.汉语单音节识别测试的开发。
Ear Hear. 2009 Feb;30(1):90-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31818f28a6.
3
[Digital recording and equivalent evaluation of Mandarin speech test materials].[汉语言语测试材料的数字录制及等效性评估]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Nov;20(22):1011-5.
4
Time-compressed speech test in Brazilian Portuguese.巴西葡萄牙语的时间压缩言语测试。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2007 Jun;62(3):261-72. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322007000300010.
5
Psychometric Characteristics of Spanish Monosyllabic, Bisyllabic, and Trisyllabic Words for Use in Word-Recognition Protocols.用于词识别协议的西班牙语单音节、双音节和三音节词的心理测量学特征。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Jul;31(7):531-546. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709446. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
6
[The Freiburg monosyllable word test in postoperative cochlear implant diagnostics].[术后人工耳蜗诊断中的弗莱堡单音节词测试]
HNO. 2016 Aug;64(8):601-7. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0194-y.
7
Development of a mandarin monosyllable test material with homogenous items (II): lists equivalence evaluation.具有同质项目的汉语单音节测试材料的开发(II):列表等效性评估
Acta Otolaryngol. 2011 Oct;131(10):1051-60. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2011.583267. Epub 2011 May 23.
8
A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.正常听力的听众在语音频谱噪声中对PB - 50、CID W - 22、NU - 6、W - 1双音节词以及由同一说话者说出的单音节数字的识别性能比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Jun;19(6):496-506. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.6.5.
9
Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists.发展和验证 AzBio 句子列表。
Ear Hear. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):112-7. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822c2549.
10
[Test-retest reliability of Mandarin monosyllable lists: a multi-center study in Chinese dialectal regions].[汉语单音节词表的重测信度:中国方言地区的多中心研究]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Mar;45(3):200-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The word-with-noise test: development, validation and reference values.噪声词测试:发展、验证和参考值。
Codas. 2024 May 31;36(3):e20230091. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242023091pt. eCollection 2024.
2
The word-with-noise test: test-retest reliability in normal-hearing adults.噪声词测试:正常听力成年人的重测信度。
Codas. 2024 Apr 8;36(2):e20230093. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232023093pt. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
t-Test and ANOVA for data with ceiling and/or floor effects.有天花板效应和/或地板效应的数据的 t 检验和方差分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Feb;53(1):264-277. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01407-2.
2
The homogeneity with respect to intelligibility of recorded word-recognition materials.录制的单词识别材料在可懂度方面的同质性。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Apr;26(4):331-45. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.4.2.
3
Development of a mandarin monosyllable test material with homogenous items (II): lists equivalence evaluation.具有同质项目的汉语单音节测试材料的开发(II):列表等效性评估
Acta Otolaryngol. 2011 Oct;131(10):1051-60. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2011.583267. Epub 2011 May 23.
4
Development of Mandarin monosyllabic speech test materials in China.普通话单音节言语测试材料的研制。
Int J Audiol. 2009 May;48(5):300-11. doi: 10.1080/14992020802607456.
5
A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.正常听力的听众在语音频谱噪声中对PB - 50、CID W - 22、NU - 6、W - 1双音节词以及由同一说话者说出的单音节数字的识别性能比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Jun;19(6):496-506. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.6.5.
6
Articulation testing methods.关节活动度测试方法。
Laryngoscope. 1948 Sep;58(9):955-91. doi: 10.1288/00005537-194809000-00002.
7
Basic principles of speech audiometry.言语测听法的基本原理。
Acta Otolaryngol. 1951;40(1-2):62-71. doi: 10.3109/00016485109138908.
8
PROBLEMS IN THE MEASUREMENT OF SPEECH DISCRIMINATION.言语辨别测量中的问题。
Arch Otolaryngol. 1965 Sep;82:253-60. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1965.00760010255007.
9
Intelligibility of words varying in familiarity.不同熟悉度单词的可懂度。
J Speech Hear Res. 1961 Jun;4:113-29. doi: 10.1044/jshr.0402.113.
10
Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry.临床听力测定中言语使用相关的问题。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1955 Dec;64(4):1234-44. doi: 10.1177/000348945506400424.