From the College of Medicine (Naaz, R. Hussein, Khan, M. Hussein); and from the Department of Pathology (Arain), College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Med J. 2022 Jan;43(1):61-66. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.1.20210698.
To assess the emotional responses and coping strategies of medical students during the lockdown and social distancing measures implemented during the coronavirus disease -19 (COVID-19) pandemic.
This cross‑sectional study is based on data collected from undergraduate medical students at the College of Medicine, Alfaisal University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, during the fall semester of academic year 2020-2021. All the participants completed a self-administered online questionnaire consisting of 3 parts: demographic information, emotional response scale, and 14-item, adapted brief coping orientation to problems experienced inventory to determine the use of avoidant or approach coping strategies. Coping and emotional response scores were compared using t-test. Linear regression analysis was also performed.
A total of 261 students from all years were included. Overall scores were higher for avoidant coping strategies. The use of avoidant coping strategies was significantly higher in females (=0.03) and in preclinical students (<0.001). Preclinical students had a higher mean score for anger (=0.002). Conversely, students in the clinical phase had higher scores for anxiety (=0.005) and sadness (=0.027). The regression analysis of emotional responses and coping strategies suggests that avoidant coping is a predictor of anger (=0.003) and sadness (=0.005).
Interventions to train medical students in the use of more productive and effective coping strategies may reduce negative emotional responses linked to the present COVID-19 pandemic and in the future.
评估医学生在冠状病毒病-19(COVID-19)大流行期间实施封锁和社交距离措施期间的情绪反应和应对策略。
本横断面研究基于 2020-2021 学年沙特阿拉伯利雅得法萨尔大学医学院本科医学生在秋季学期收集的数据。所有参与者都完成了一份自我管理的在线问卷,其中包括 3 部分:人口统计学信息、情绪反应量表和 14 项改编的简要应对问题体验库存,以确定使用回避或接近应对策略。使用 t 检验比较应对和情绪反应得分。还进行了线性回归分析。
共纳入 261 名来自所有年级的学生。总体得分回避应对策略较高。女性(=0.03)和临床前学生(<0.001)回避应对策略的使用明显更高。临床前学生的愤怒平均得分较高(=0.002)。相反,临床阶段的学生焦虑(=0.005)和悲伤(=0.027)得分较高。情绪反应和应对策略的回归分析表明,回避应对是愤怒(=0.003)和悲伤(=0.005)的预测因素。
培训医学生使用更具生产力和更有效的应对策略的干预措施可能会减少与当前 COVID-19 大流行以及未来相关的负面情绪反应。