• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查“科学”子版块中科学传播的中介公众参与:从参与者的角度。

Investigating mediated public engagement with science on the "science" subreddit: From the participants' perspective.

机构信息

Information & Library Science, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing & Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.

Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0249181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249181. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0249181
PMID:33909620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8081246/
Abstract

While public engagement with science activities traditionally inhabits physical environments (i.e., museum exhibits), as the Internet becomes more ubiquitous, new types of public engagement with science mediated through information technologies have emerged. Instead of having scientific findings filtered through traditional mediators, scientists have begun to take advantage of social media in order to communicate directly with the general public. This paper focuses on technology mediated public engagement with science in an online environment, specifically the sub-Reddit called "r/science", on a popular platform, Reddit, in which we investigated the factors contributing to user engagement and perceived effects of science communication from the users' perspectives. The survey instrument including user engagement scales, perceived effects of science communication, and demographics were distributed among 2000 participants in the r/science Ask Me Anything (AMA) series. We analyzed 146 survey responses using descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression. The findings indicated that the participants were generally engaged compared to ones in other studies that used the same user engagement scales and perceived positive effects on science communication, except when it came to building trust. Furthermore, we found that time spent on this particular platform appeared to be the most important factor when it came to positive perceived effects of r/science AMAs. This type of mediated public engagement has been insufficiently investigated, most particularly in terms of the examination of participants' perspectives. This void is addressed in this study. The findings from the study will also be informative to similar platforms that support mediated public engagement with science.

摘要

虽然公众参与科学活动传统上存在于物理环境中(即博物馆展览),但随着互联网的普及,通过信息技术进行的新型公众参与科学活动也已经出现。科学家们开始利用社交媒体直接与公众交流,而不是让科学发现经过传统中介过滤。本文专注于在线环境中通过技术实现的公众参与科学活动,特别是在 Reddit 这个流行平台上的 r/science 子版块,我们从用户的角度调查了促成用户参与的因素以及他们对科学传播的感知效果。该调查工具包括用户参与度量表、科学传播的感知效果以及人口统计学信息,在 r/science 的 Ask Me Anything (AMA) 系列中向 2000 名参与者分发。我们使用描述性统计和有序逻辑回归分析了 146 份调查回复。研究结果表明,与使用相同用户参与度量表的其他研究相比,参与者的参与度普遍较高,除了在建立信任方面。此外,我们发现,在这个特定平台上花费的时间似乎是影响 r/science AMA 感知效果的最重要因素。这种中介的公众参与活动尚未得到充分研究,特别是在考察参与者的观点方面。本研究填补了这一空白。该研究的结果也将为支持科学中介公众参与的类似平台提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ad/8081246/37bf914bc75d/pone.0249181.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ad/8081246/bb1b9b49b6b7/pone.0249181.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ad/8081246/5e4ce19cfe2f/pone.0249181.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ad/8081246/9ecc098f8bff/pone.0249181.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ad/8081246/37bf914bc75d/pone.0249181.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ad/8081246/bb1b9b49b6b7/pone.0249181.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ad/8081246/5e4ce19cfe2f/pone.0249181.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ad/8081246/9ecc098f8bff/pone.0249181.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ad/8081246/37bf914bc75d/pone.0249181.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating mediated public engagement with science on the "science" subreddit: From the participants' perspective.调查“科学”子版块中科学传播的中介公众参与:从参与者的角度。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0249181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249181. eCollection 2021.
2
An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science.一种新兴的公众参与科学的形式:Reddit r/science 上的“问我任何事”(AMA)会议。
PLoS One. 2019 May 15;14(5):e0216789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216789. eCollection 2019.
3
I Sought It, I Reddit: Examining Health Information Engagement Behaviors among Reddit Users.我在 Reddit 上搜索过:考察 Reddit 用户对健康信息的参与行为。
J Health Commun. 2018;23(5):470-476. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1465493. Epub 2018 May 2.
4
I am a scientist . . . Ask Me Anything: Examining differences between male and female scientists participating in a Reddit AMA session.我是一名科学家……有问必答:探讨参与 Reddit AMA 会议的男女科学家之间的差异。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 May;31(4):458-472. doi: 10.1177/09636625211048775. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
5
Online community queries on hormonal male contraception: An analysis of the Reddit "Ask Me Anything" experience.在线社区对男性荷尔蒙避孕的咨询:对 Reddit“问我任何事”经验的分析。
Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
Addressing immediate public coronavirus (COVID-19) concerns through social media: Utilizing Reddit's AMA as a framework for Public Engagement with Science.通过社交媒体解决当前公众对冠状病毒(COVID-19)的担忧:利用 Reddit 的 AMA 作为与公众进行科学互动的框架。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 6;15(10):e0240326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240326. eCollection 2020.
7
Footprints of Fascination: Digital Traces of Public Engagement with Particle Physics on CERN's Social Media Platforms.魅力的足迹:欧洲核子研究组织社交媒体平台上公众参与粒子物理学的数字痕迹。
PLoS One. 2016 May 27;11(5):e0156409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156409. eCollection 2016.
8
Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media.静态与动态科学传播方法:社交媒体中用户与科学互动的批判性分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 31;16(3):e0248507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248507. eCollection 2021.
9
Characterizing Social Media Messages Related to Underage JUUL E-Cigarette Buying and Selling: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Reddit Subreddits.描述与未成年人购买和销售JUUL电子烟相关的社交媒体信息:Reddit子版块的横断面分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e16962. doi: 10.2196/16962.
10
Engagement with medical cannabis information from online and mass media sources: Is it related to medical cannabis attitudes and support for legalization?从在线和大众媒体来源获取医用大麻信息:这与医用大麻态度和支持合法化有关吗?
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Nov;73:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
What Happens When You Click and Drag: Unpacking the Relationship between On-Screen Interaction and User Engagement with an Anti-Smoking Website.当你点击并拖动时会发生什么:解析与反吸烟网站的用户参与度之间的关系。
Health Commun. 2020 Mar;35(3):269-280. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1560578. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol.研究人员在数字和社交媒体生态系统中与公众使用的健康科学传播策略:一项系统综述方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 30;8(1):e019833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019833.
3
How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?
科学家们如何在工作场所使用社交媒体?
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0162680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162680. eCollection 2016.
4
Health Communication in Social Media: Message Features Predicting User Engagement on Diabetes-Related Facebook Pages.社交媒体中的健康传播:预测用户对糖尿病相关脸书页面参与度的信息特征
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Oct;50(5):678-689. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9793-9.
5
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.科学家对公众参与沟通目标的优先排序。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.
6
Headlice eradication as everyday engagement with science: An analysis of online parenting discussions.将消灭头虱作为日常的科学实践:对在线育儿讨论的分析
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jul;23(5):574-91. doi: 10.1177/0963662512453419.
7
Why people attend science festivals: Interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research.人们参加科学节的原因:公众参与科研的兴趣、动机及自我报告的益处。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jul;23(5):557-73. doi: 10.1177/0963662512458624.
8
The science of sharing and the sharing of science.分享的科学与科学的分享。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13642-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317511111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
9
Why should we promote public engagement with science?我们为什么要促进公众参与科学?
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):4-15. doi: 10.1177/0963662513518154.
10
New media landscapes and the science information consumer.新媒体环境与科学信息消费者
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14096-101. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212744110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.