Physicians' perceptions of two ways of algorithm presentation: graphic versus text-based approach.

Acute bleeding during surgery or after trauma harms patients, and challenges involved physicians. Protocols and cognitive aids can help in such situations. This dual-centre study investigated physicians' opinions regarding two ways to present cognitive aids, graphic 'Haemostasis Traffic Light' and text-based, using the example of a coagulation management algorithm to identify the strengths and limitations of both presentation modalities. Using qualitative research methods, we identified recurring answer patterns and derived major topics and subthemes through inductive coding. Eighty-four physicians participated. We assigned each half randomly to one of the cognitive aids (graphic/text-based) and determined 447 usable statements. We qualitatively deduced the importance of having a cognitive aid for physicians. Furthermore, it is noticeable that the graphic group made more positive comments (154 of 242 (64%) statements), while the text-based participants made more negative annotations (126 of 205 (61%) statements), suggesting a generally stronger approval of this cognitive aid. This qualitative study provides an overview of physicians` positive and negative perceptions regarding two presentation ways for a coagulation management algorithm. Participants perceived the graphic method created according to user-centred design principles more positively. The analysis reveals components that an ideal algorithm should have to help streamline the decision-making process.