• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度农村可持续的、基于伙伴关系的远程医疗服务模式:古吉拉特邦图维尔村的早期过程评估。

A model for sustainable, partnership-based telehealth services in rural India: An early process evaluation from Tuver village, Gujarat.

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.

Apollo Telemedicine Networking Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0261907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261907. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0261907
PMID:35025902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8757919/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Telehealth can improve access to high-quality healthcare for rural populations in India. However, rural communities often have other needs, such as sanitation or employment, to benefit fully from telehealth offerings, highlighting a need for systems-level solutions. A Business of Humanity approach argues that innovative solutions to wicked problems like these require strategic decision-making that attends to a) humaneness, e.g., equity and safety and b) humankind, or the needs and potential of large and growing markets comprised of marginalized and low-income individuals. The approach is expected to improve economic performance and long-term value creation for partners, thus supporting sustainability.

METHODS

A demonstration project was conducted in Tuver, a rural and tribal village in Gujarat, India. The project included seven components: a partnership that emphasized power-sharing and complementary contributions; telehealth services; health promotion; digital services; power infrastructure; water and sanitation; and agribusiness. Core partners included the academic partner, local village leadership, a local development foundation, a telehealth provider, and a design-build contractor. This early process evaluation relies on administrative data, field notes, and project documentation and was analyzed using a case study approach.

RESULTS

Findings highlight the importance of taking a systems perspective and engaging inter-sectoral partners through alignment of values and goals. Additionally, the creation of a synergistic, health-promoting ecosystem offers potential to support telehealth services in the long-term. At the same time, engaging rural, tribal communities in the use of technological advances posed a challenge, though local staff and intermediaries were effective in bridging disconnects.

CONCLUSION

Overall, this early process evaluation highlights the promise and challenges of using a Business of Humanity approach for coordinated, sustainable community-level action to improve the health and well-being of marginalized communities.

摘要

背景

远程医疗可以改善印度农村地区获得高质量医疗保健的机会。然而,农村社区通常还有其他需求,例如卫生或就业,才能充分受益于远程医疗服务,这凸显了需要系统层面的解决方案。人类商业方法认为,解决这些棘手问题的创新解决方案需要战略决策,既要考虑到 a)人道性,例如公平和安全,又要考虑到 b)人类,即由边缘化和低收入个人组成的庞大且不断增长的市场的需求和潜力。该方法有望提高合作伙伴的经济绩效和长期价值创造,从而支持可持续性。

方法

在印度古吉拉特邦的图维尔(Tuver)进行了一个示范项目。该项目包括七个组成部分:强调权力共享和互补贡献的伙伴关系;远程医疗服务;健康促进;数字服务;电力基础设施;水和卫生设施;以及农业综合企业。核心合作伙伴包括学术合作伙伴、当地村庄领导、当地发展基金会、远程医疗提供商和设计-建造承包商。本早期过程评估依赖于行政数据、实地记录和项目文件,并使用案例研究方法进行分析。

结果

研究结果强调了采取系统视角的重要性,并通过价值和目标的一致性来吸引跨部门合作伙伴。此外,创建一个协同的、促进健康的生态系统有潜力为远程医疗服务提供长期支持。与此同时,让农村、部落社区参与使用技术进步带来了挑战,尽管当地工作人员和中介机构在弥合差距方面非常有效。

结论

总的来说,本早期过程评估强调了使用人类商业方法进行协调、可持续的社区层面行动以改善边缘化社区健康和福祉的前景和挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df87/8757919/8a86202ba1f7/pone.0261907.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df87/8757919/8a86202ba1f7/pone.0261907.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df87/8757919/8a86202ba1f7/pone.0261907.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A model for sustainable, partnership-based telehealth services in rural India: An early process evaluation from Tuver village, Gujarat.印度农村可持续的、基于伙伴关系的远程医疗服务模式:古吉拉特邦图维尔村的早期过程评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0261907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261907. eCollection 2022.
2
Chinese villages and their sustainable future: the European Union-China-Research Project "SUCCESS".中国乡村及其可持续未来:欧盟-中国研究项目“SUCCESS”
J Environ Manage. 2008 Apr;87(2):204-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
3
Transitioning a home telehealth project into a sustainable, large-scale service: a qualitative study.将家庭远程医疗项目转变为可持续的大规模服务:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 16;16:183. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1436-0.
4
The Care Coordination Home Telehealth (CCHT) rural demonstration project: a symptom-based approach for serving older veterans in remote geographical settings.护理协调家庭远程医疗(CCHT)农村示范项目:一种基于症状的方法,用于为偏远地区的老年退伍军人提供服务。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;10(2):1375. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
5
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
6
Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia: a systematic review of models of care and factors influencing success and sustainability.澳大利亚农村和偏远地区的远程医疗服务:对护理模式以及影响成功与可持续性的因素的系统评价
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Oct-Dec;16(4):3808. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
7
A Pilot Study to Improve Access to Eye Care Services for Patients in Rural India by Implementing Community Ophthalmology through Innovative Telehealth Technology.一项通过创新远程医疗技术实施社区眼科来改善印度农村地区患者获得眼科护理服务机会的试点研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;214:139-45.
8
The diffusion of telehealth in rural American Indian communities: a retrospective survey of key stakeholders.美国印第安人农村社区远程医疗的传播:关键利益相关者的回顾性调查。
Telemed J E Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):60-6. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0076. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
9
Understanding the Intention to Use Telehealth Services in Underserved Hispanic Border Communities: Cross-Sectional Study.理解服务不足的西班牙裔边境社区使用远程医疗服务的意图:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 3;22(9):e21012. doi: 10.2196/21012.
10
Service providers' experiences of using a telehealth network 12 months after digitisation of a large Australian rural mental health service.在澳大利亚一个大型农村心理健康服务机构数字化12个月后,服务提供商使用远程医疗网络的体验。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:8-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting Digital Health Implementations Based on the iCHECK-DH Guidelines and Checklist: Development of an Interactive Toolkit.基于iCHECK-DH指南和清单报告数字健康实施情况:交互式工具包的开发
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e74235. doi: 10.2196/74235.
2
Stakeholder engagement in healthcare research in India - A systematic review.印度医疗保健研究中的利益相关者参与——一项系统综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 May 15;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01341-9.
3
Challenges, Barriers, and Facilitators in Telemedicine Implementation in India: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing health equity through a theoretically critical implementation science.通过理论上具有批判性的实施科学推进健康公平。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Aug 13;11(8):1617-1625. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab008.
2
Ayushman Bharat National Health Protection Scheme: an Ethical Analysis.阿育吠陀印度国家健康保护计划:一项伦理分析。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019 Apr 3;11(1):69-80. doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00083-5. eCollection 2019 Mar.
3
Telehealth as a tool for equity: pros, cons and recommendations.远程医疗作为促进公平的工具:优点、缺点及建议
印度远程医疗实施中的挑战、障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 21;16(8):e67388. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67388. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Identifying personalized barriers for hypertension self-management from TASKS framework.从 TASKS 框架识别高血压自我管理的个性化障碍。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Aug 14;17(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06893-7.
5
Exploring the potential of telemedicine for improved primary healthcare in India: a comprehensive review.探索远程医疗在改善印度初级医疗保健方面的潜力:一项综合综述。
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024 Jun 8;27:100431. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100431. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Using Participatory Implementation Science to Advance Health Equity.利用参与式实施科学促进健康公平。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2024 May;45(1):47-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060722-024251. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
7
Public-private partnership in the Portuguese health sector.葡萄牙卫生部门的公私合作伙伴关系。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 14;9(8):e19122. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19122. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
iCHECK-DH: Guidelines and Checklist for the Reporting on Digital Health Implementations.iCHECK-DH:数字健康实施报告的指南和清单。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 10;25:e46694. doi: 10.2196/46694.
9
Utility analysis of digital villages to empower balanced urban-rural development based on the three-stage DEA-Malmquist model.基于三阶段 DEA-Malmquist 模型的数字村庄在促进城乡均衡发展中的效用分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 1;17(8):e0270952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270952. eCollection 2022.
10
Why do we fall short in reaching equity in telerheumatology?为什么我们在远程风湿病学中未能实现公平性?
Health Policy Technol. 2022 Mar;11(1):100609. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2022.100609. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
N Z Med J. 2021 Feb 19;134(1530):111-115.
4
Health of tribal populations in India: How long can we afford to neglect?印度部落人口的健康状况:我们还能忽视多久?
Indian J Med Res. 2019 Mar;149(3):313-316. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2079_18.
5
Best practices in scaling digital health in low and middle income countries.在中低收入国家推广数字健康的最佳实践。
Global Health. 2018 Nov 3;14(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0424-z.
6
Identifying health policy and systems research priorities on multisectoral collaboration for health in low-income and middle-income countries.确定低收入和中等收入国家卫生领域多部门合作的卫生政策与系统研究重点。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 10;3(Suppl 4):e000970. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000970. eCollection 2018.
7
Participatory implementation science to increase the impact of evidence-based cancer prevention and control.参与式实施科学以提高循证癌症预防与控制的影响力。
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Mar;29(3):363-369. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1008-1. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
8
Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review.评估全球采用远程医疗的障碍:系统评价。
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jan;24(1):4-12. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16674087. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
9
Distribution of neurologists and neurosurgeons in India and its relevance to the adoption of telemedicine.印度神经科医生和神经外科医生的分布及其与远程医疗应用的相关性。
Neurol India. 2015 Mar-Apr;63(2):142-54. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.156274.
10
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.