Steno Diabetes Centre Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
AmbuFlex, Center for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark.
Diabet Med. 2022 May;39(5):e14791. doi: 10.1111/dme.14791. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
The objective of this study was to assess the impact of health care-initiated visits versus patient-controlled flexible visits on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in people with type 1 diabetes.
The DiabetesFlex trial was a randomized controlled, pragmatic non-inferiority 15-month follow-up study comparing standard care (face-to-face visits every 4 months) with DiabetesFlex (patient-controlled flexible visits using patient-reported, outcome-based telehealth follow-up). Of 343 enrolled participants, 160 in each group completed the study. The primary outcome was mean change in HbA from baseline to 15-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were blood pressure, lipid levels, frequency of visits, the World Health Organization score-five well-being-index (WHO-5), the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) scale and experience of participation in own care (participation score).
The adjusted mean difference in HbA between standard care and DiabetesFlex was similar and below the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.4% (-0.03% [95%CI: 0.15, 0.11]/-0.27 mmol/mol [-1.71, 1.16]). No intergroup mean changes in lipid or blood pressure were observed. Conversely, DiabetesFlex participants presented an increased mean WHO-5 index of 4.5 (1.3, 7.3), participation score of 1.1 (0.5, 2.0), and decreased PAID score of -4.8 (-7.1, -2.6) compared with standard care. During follow-up, DiabetesFlex participants actively changed 23% of face-to-face visits to telephone consultations, cancelled more visits (17% vs. 9%), and stayed away without cancellation less often (2% vs. 8%).
Compared with standard care, flexible patient-controlled visits combined with patient-reported outcomes in participants with metabolic controlled type 1 diabetes and good psychological well-being further improved diabetes-related well-being and decreased face-to-face visits while maintaining safe diabetes management.
本研究旨在评估医疗保健发起的就诊与患者控制的灵活就诊对 1 型糖尿病患者的临床和患者报告结局的影响。
DiabetesFlex 试验是一项随机对照、实用非劣效性 15 个月随访研究,比较了标准护理(每 4 个月进行一次面对面就诊)与 DiabetesFlex(使用患者报告的、基于结局的远程医疗随访进行患者控制的灵活就诊)。在 343 名入组参与者中,每组有 160 名参与者完成了研究。主要结局是从基线到 15 个月随访时的 HbA 平均变化。次要结局是血压、血脂水平、就诊频率、世界卫生组织五维健康指数(WHO-5)、糖尿病问题领域量表(PAID)和参与自身护理的体验(参与评分)。
标准护理与 DiabetesFlex 之间的 HbA 调整后平均差异相似,且低于预设的非劣效性边界 0.4%(-0.03% [95%CI:0.15,0.11]/-0.27mmol/mol [-1.71,1.16])。未观察到血脂或血压的组间平均变化。相反,与标准护理相比,DiabetesFlex 组的患者的 WHO-5 指数平均增加了 4.5(1.3,7.3),参与评分增加了 1.1(0.5,2.0),PAID 评分降低了-4.8(-7.1,-2.6)。在随访期间,DiabetesFlex 组患者将 23%的面对面就诊主动改为电话咨询,取消了更多的就诊(17%比 9%),且不取消就诊的情况更少(2%比 8%)。
与标准护理相比,在代谢控制良好且心理健康状况良好的 1 型糖尿病患者中,灵活的患者控制就诊与患者报告结局相结合,进一步改善了与糖尿病相关的健康状况,并减少了面对面就诊次数,同时保持了安全的糖尿病管理。