Wertheim E H, Habib C, Cumming G
Department of Psychology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Percept Mot Skills. 1986 Apr;62(2):523-9. doi: 10.2466/pms.1986.62.2.523.
Bandler and Grinder's hypothesis that eye-movements reflect sensory processing was examined. 28 volunteers first memorized and then recalled visual, auditory, and kinesthetic stimuli. Changes in eye-positions during recall were videotaped and categorized by two raters into positions hypothesized by Bandler and Grinder's model to represent visual, auditory, and kinesthetic recall. Planned contrast analyses suggested that visual stimulus items, when recalled, elicited significantly more upward eye-positions and stares than auditory and kinesthetic items. Auditory and kinesthetic items, however, did not elicit more changes in eye-position hypothesized by the model to represent auditory and kinesthetic recall, respectively.
班德勒和格林德提出的眼动反映感觉加工的假设得到了检验。28名志愿者先进行记忆，然后回忆视觉、听觉和动觉刺激。回忆过程中眼睛位置的变化被录像，两名评分者将其分类为班德勒和格林德模型假设的代表视觉、听觉和动觉回忆的位置。计划对比分析表明，视觉刺激项目在被回忆时，比听觉和动觉项目引发了更多的向上眼位和凝视。然而，听觉和动觉项目并没有分别引发模型假设的代表听觉和动觉回忆的更多眼位变化。
