Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Devon Air Ambulance Trust, Exeter, UK.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 15;30(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-00992-9.
Motor vehicle collisions remain a common cause of spinal cord injury. Biomechanical studies of spinal movement often lack "real world" context and applicability. Additional data may enhance our understanding of the potential for secondary spinal cord injury. We propose the metric 'travel' (total movement) and suggest that our understanding of movement related risk of injury could be improved if travel was routinely reported. We report maximal movement and travel for collar application in vehicle and subsequent self-extrication.
Biomechanical data on application of cervical collar with the volunteer sat in a vehicle were collected using Inertial Measurement Units on 6 healthy volunteers. Maximal movement and travel are reported. These data and a re-analysis of previously published work is used to demonstrate the utility of travel and maximal movement in the context of self-extrication.
Data from a total of 60 in-vehicle collar applications across three female and three male volunteers was successfully collected for analysis. The mean age across participants was 50.3 years (range 28-68) and the BMI was 27.7 (range 21.5-34.6). The mean maximal anterior-posterior movement associated with collar application was 2.3 mm with a total AP travel of 4.9 mm. Travel (total movement) for in-car application of collar and self-extrication was 9.5 mm compared to 9.4 mm travel for self-extrication without a collar.
We have demonstrated the application of 'travel' in the context of self-extrication. Total travel is similar across self-extricating healthy volunteers with and without a collar. We suggest that where possible 'travel' is collected and reported in future biomechanical studies in this and related areas of research. It remains appropriate to apply a cervical collar to self-extricating casualties when the clinical target is that of movement minimisation.
机动车事故仍然是脊髓损伤的常见原因。对脊柱运动的生物力学研究往往缺乏“真实世界”的背景和适用性。更多的数据可能会增强我们对继发性脊髓损伤的潜在风险的理解。我们提出了“行程”(总移动距离)这一指标,并建议,如果常规报告行程,我们对与运动相关的损伤风险的理解可能会得到提高。我们报告了在车辆中使用颈托时的最大移动距离和行程,以及随后的自行脱困。
使用惯性测量单元(IMU)在 6 名健康志愿者身上采集了志愿者坐在车辆中时应用颈托的生物力学数据。报告最大移动距离和行程。这些数据以及对以前发表的工作的重新分析,用于演示行程和最大移动距离在自行脱困中的应用。
总共成功收集了来自 3 名女性和 3 名男性志愿者的 60 次车内颈托应用的数据进行分析。参与者的平均年龄为 50.3 岁(范围 28-68 岁),体重指数(BMI)为 27.7(范围 21.5-34.6)。与颈托应用相关的最大前后移动的平均值为 2.3 毫米,总行程为 4.9 毫米。与无颈托自行脱困相比,车内应用颈托和自行脱困的行程(总移动距离)为 9.5 毫米。
我们已经在自行脱困的背景下展示了“行程”的应用。有颈托和无颈托的健康志愿者在自行脱困时的总行程相似。我们建议,在未来的生物力学研究中,在这些和相关研究领域中尽可能收集和报告“行程”。当临床目标是减少运动时,仍然可以向自行脱困的伤员应用颈托。