Nutbeam Tim, Fenwick Rob, Haldane Charlotte, Leech Caroline, Foote Emily, Todd Simon, Lockey David
IMPACT, Centre for Post-Collision Research Innovation and Translation, Exeter, UK.
University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 6;33(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01312-z.
Road traffic injury is the leading cause of death among young people globally, with motor vehicle collisions often resulting in severe injuries and entrapment. Traditional extrication techniques focus on limiting movement to prevent spinal cord injuries, but recent findings from the EXIT project challenge this approach. This paper presents updated recommendations from the Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care (FPHC) that reflect the latest evidence on extrication practices.
A systematic scoping review identified 170 relevant articles from 7083 records. Findings, together with EXIT project data, informed the development of 12 core and supplemental statements on extrication. In April 2024, 43 subject matter experts from diverse backgrounds participated in a consensus process. Statements were discussed, voted on, and synthesised into the updated statement, ratified by FPHC.
Consensus was achieved for all 12 statements, emphasising self-extrication as a preferred, primary approach, reducing extrication time, and moving away from absolute movement minimisation. The U-STEP OUT algorithm was endorsed as a decision-making tool. Key themes included interdisciplinary collaboration, use of operational and clinical decision aids, and enhanced training.
This consensus statement marks a paradigm shift in extrication practice, moving away from traditional movement minimisation to a focus on time-sensitive, patient-centred care. The findings advocate for empowering both clinical and non-clinical responders and improving interdisciplinary training and communication. Further research is needed to assess the broader implementation of this statement and to explore the psychological impacts of entrapment and extrication on patients.
道路交通伤害是全球年轻人死亡的主要原因,机动车碰撞常常导致重伤和被困。传统的解救技术侧重于限制移动以防止脊髓损伤,但EXIT项目的最新研究结果对这种方法提出了挑战。本文介绍了院前护理学院(FPHC)的最新建议,这些建议反映了解救实践的最新证据。
一项系统的范围综述从7083条记录中识别出170篇相关文章。研究结果与EXIT项目数据一起,为制定12条关于解救的核心和补充声明提供了依据。2024年4月,43名来自不同背景的主题专家参与了共识达成过程。对声明进行了讨论、投票,并综合形成了更新后的声明,该声明得到了FPHC的批准。
12条声明均达成了共识,强调自我解救是首选的主要方法,减少解救时间,并摒弃绝对最小化移动的做法。U-STEP OUT算法被认可为一种决策工具。关键主题包括跨学科协作、使用操作和临床决策辅助工具以及加强培训。
这一共识声明标志着解救实践的范式转变,从传统的最小化移动转向关注对时间敏感的、以患者为中心的护理。研究结果主张赋予临床和非临床救援人员权力,并改善跨学科培训和沟通。需要进一步研究以评估该声明的更广泛实施情况,并探索被困和解救对患者的心理影响。