• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良帕金森活动量表(M-PAS)日语版的效度与信度

Validation and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Modified Parkinson Activity Scale (M-PAS).

作者信息

Taniguchi Seira, Nakata Yoko, Inoue Michiko, Marumoto Kohei

机构信息

Center for Information and Neural Networks, Advanced ICT Research Institute, NICT, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hyogo Prefectural Rehabilitation Hospital at Nishi-Harima, Hyogo, Japan.

出版信息

Prog Rehabil Med. 2021 Dec 22;6:20210051. doi: 10.2490/prm.20210051. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2490/prm.20210051
PMID:35036614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8692784/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Modified Parkinson Activity Scale (M-PAS) is used to identify the most important activity limitations in patients with Parkinson's disease. We developed a Japanese version of the M-PAS and evaluated its reliability and validity.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with Parkinson's disease (median age 71 years old, range 58-83) were enrolled, and two raters used the Japanese version of M-PAS to assess the subjects. The inter-rater reliability was evaluated using Cohen's weighted kappa coefficient for the total score and three domain scores; systematic error was investigated using Bland-Altman analysis. Concurrent validity of the Japanese M-PAS was measured using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Cohen's kappa coefficients for the total score and the three domain scores were in the range 0.81-0.98, and 95% confidence intervals included zero for each item, suggesting excellent agreement and no systematic errors. The scores of the Japanese version of M-PAS were significantly correlated with the scores of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II (Spearman's rho=-0.56, P <0.01) and Part III (Spearman's rho=-0.32, P <0.01). The percentage of patients with the highest and the lowest scores in the Japanese version of M-PAS suggested no ceiling or floor effects.

CONCLUSION

The Japanese version of M-PAS showed excellent inter-rater reliability and good concurrent validity without ceiling or floor effects.

摘要

目的

改良帕金森活动量表(M-PAS)用于识别帕金森病患者最重要的活动受限情况。我们开发了M-PAS的日语版本,并评估了其信度和效度。

方法

纳入25例帕金森病患者(中位年龄71岁,范围58 - 83岁),两名评估者使用M-PAS日语版本对受试者进行评估。使用Cohen加权kappa系数评估总分及三个领域得分的评估者间信度;使用Bland-Altman分析研究系统误差。使用Spearman等级相关系数测量M-PAS日语版本的同时效度。

结果

总分及三个领域得分的Cohen kappa系数在0.81 - 0.98范围内,各项目的95%置信区间包含零,表明一致性良好且无系统误差。M-PAS日语版本的得分与运动障碍协会统一帕金森病评定量表第二部分(Spearman相关系数=-0.56,P<0.01)和第三部分(Spearman相关系数=-0.32,P<0.01)的得分显著相关。M-PAS日语版本中得分最高和最低的患者百分比表明无天花板效应或地板效应。

结论

M-PAS日语版本显示出良好的评估者间信度和良好的同时效度,且无天花板效应或地板效应。

相似文献

1
Validation and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Modified Parkinson Activity Scale (M-PAS).改良帕金森活动量表(M-PAS)日语版的效度与信度
Prog Rehabil Med. 2021 Dec 22;6:20210051. doi: 10.2490/prm.20210051. eCollection 2021.
2
Validity, reliability, and measurement error of the Japanese version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire for patients with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者日本版步态冻结问卷的效度、信度和测量误差
Physiother Theory Pract. 2025 Apr;41(4):820-826. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2024.2361325. Epub 2024 May 30.
3
Clinimetric analyses of the Modified Parkinson Activity Scale.改良帕金森病活动量表的临床计量学分析
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 May;15(4):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.06.003. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
4
Parkinson Anxiety Scale: A Validation Study for the Brazilian Population.帕金森焦虑量表:巴西人群的效度研究。
J Mov Disord. 2020 Sep;13(3):199-204. doi: 10.14802/jmd.20031. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
5
[Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].《青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)法语版的翻译与验证》
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):499-505.
6
Non-Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson's Disease: Validation of the Non-Motor Fluctuation Assessment Questionnaire.帕金森病非运动波动:非运动波动评估问卷的验证。
Mov Disord. 2021 Jun;36(6):1392-1400. doi: 10.1002/mds.28507. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
7
Validation of the Danish version of the musculoskeletal tumour society score questionnaire.丹麦版肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分问卷的验证
World J Orthop. 2019 Jan 18;10(1):23-32. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i1.23.
8
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: reliability and validity evidence.胃肠道内镜能力评估工具:可靠性和有效性证据。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1417-1424.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.030. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
9
The movement disorder society nonmotor rating scale: Initial validation study.运动障碍学会非运动症状评定量表:初步验证研究。
Mov Disord. 2020 Jan;35(1):116-133. doi: 10.1002/mds.27862. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
10
Validation of computer-administered clinical rating scale: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale assessment with Interactive Voice Response technology--Japanese version.计算机化临床评定量表的验证:使用交互式语音应答技术评估汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表——日本版。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013 May;67(4):253-8. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12048.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement instruments to assess basic functional mobility in Parkinson's Disease: A systematic review of clinimetric properties and feasibility for use in clinical practice.评估帕金森病基本功能活动能力的测量工具:临床测量特性及临床应用可行性的系统评价
Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci. 2023 Mar 31;14:16-25. doi: 10.11336/jjcrs.14.16. eCollection 2023.
2
Determinants of impaired bed mobility in Parkinson's disease: Impact of hip muscle strength and motor symptoms.帕金森病患者床移动能力受损的决定因素:髋关节肌肉力量和运动症状的影响。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2022;50(4):445-452. doi: 10.3233/NRE-210301.

本文引用的文献

1
Parkinson's disease: current assessment methods and wearable devices for evaluation of movement disorder motor symptoms - a patient and healthcare professional perspective.帕金森病:运动障碍运动症状评估的当前评估方法和可穿戴设备——患者和医疗保健专业人员的视角。
BMC Neurol. 2020 Nov 18;20(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01996-7.
2
Does the MDS-UPDRS provide the precision to assess progression in early Parkinson's disease? Learnings from the Parkinson's progression marker initiative cohort.MDS-UPDRS 是否能精确评估早期帕金森病的进展?帕金森病进展标志物倡议队列的研究结果。
J Neurol. 2019 Aug;266(8):1927-1936. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09348-3. Epub 2019 May 9.
3
Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: An analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies.
肌少症生存质量问卷(SarQoL)的测量误差标准和最小可检测变化:来自 9 项验证研究的受试者分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 29;14(4):e0216065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216065. eCollection 2019.
4
Quantification of discrete behavioral components of the MDS-UPDRS.MDS-UPDRS离散行为成分的量化
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Mar;61:174-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.043. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
5
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease.帕金森病的MDS临床诊断标准。
Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1591-601. doi: 10.1002/mds.26424.
7
Parkinson Activity Scale: cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the Brazilian version.帕金森病活动量表:巴西版本的跨文化适应与信度
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jan;15(1):89-95. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12235. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
8
The Harris hip score: Do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics?哈里斯髋关节评分:天花板效应是否限制了其在骨科中的应用?
Acta Orthop. 2010 Dec;81(6):703-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.537808.
9
Ageing, neurodegeneration and Parkinson's disease.衰老、神经退行性变与帕金森病。
Age Ageing. 2010 Mar;39(2):156-61. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp223. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
10
Clinimetric analyses of the Modified Parkinson Activity Scale.改良帕金森病活动量表的临床计量学分析
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 May;15(4):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.06.003. Epub 2008 Aug 8.