• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与美国成年人糖尿病患者的低血糖和高血糖危象相关的地区社会经济剥夺程度的相关性。

Association of Area-Level Socioeconomic Deprivation With Hypoglycemic and Hyperglycemic Crises in US Adults With Diabetes.

机构信息

Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2143597. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43597.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43597
PMID:35040969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8767428/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Social determinants of health play a role in diabetes management and outcomes, including potentially life-threatening complications of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (HHS). Although several person-level socioeconomic factors have been associated with these complications, the implications of area-level socioeconomic deprivation are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between area-level deprivation and the risks of experiencing emergency department visits or hospitalizations for hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic crises (ie, DKA or HHS).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used deidentified administrative claims data for privately insured individuals and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries across the US. The analysis included adults with diabetes who met the claims criteria for diabetes between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017. Data analyses were performed from November 17, 2020, to November 11, 2021.

EXPOSURES

Area deprivation index (ADI) was derived for each county for 2016 and 2017 using 17 county-level indicators from the American Community Survey. ADI values were applied to patients who were living in each county based on their index dates and were categorized according to county-level ADI quintile (with quintile 1 having the least deprivation and quintile 5 having the most deprivation).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The numbers of emergency department visits or hospitalizations related to the primary diagnoses of hypoglycemia and DKA or HHS (ascertained using validated diagnosis codes in the first or primary position of emergency department or hospital claims) between 2016 and 2019 were calculated for each ADI quintile using negative binomial regression models and adjusted for patient age, sex, health plan type, comorbidities, glucose-lowering medication type, and percentage of White residents in the county.

RESULTS

The study population included 1 116 361 individuals (563 943 women [50.5%]), with a mean (SD) age of 64.9 (13.2) years. Of these patients, 343 726 (30.8%) resided in counties with the least deprivation (quintile 1) and 121 810 (10.9%) lived in counties with the most deprivation (quintile 5). Adjusted rates of severe hypoglycemia increased from 13.54 (95% CI, 12.91-14.17) per 1000 person-years in quintile 1 counties to 19.13 (95% CI, 17.62-20.63) per 1000 person-years in quintile 5 counties, corresponding to an incidence rate ratio of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.29-1.54; P < .001). Adjusted rates of DKA or HHS increased from 7.49 (95% CI, 6.96-8.02) per 1000 person-years in quintile 1 counties to 8.37 (95% CI, 7.50-9.23) per 1000 person-years in quintile 5 counties, corresponding to an incidence rate ratio of 1.12 (95% CI, 1.00-1.25; P = .049).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that living in counties with a high area-level deprivation was associated with an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia and DKA or HHS. The concentration of these preventable events in areas of high deprivation signals the need for interventions that target the structural barriers to optimal diabetes management and health.

摘要

重要性

社会决定因素在糖尿病管理和结果中起作用,包括严重低血糖和糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)或高血糖高渗状态(HHS)等潜在危及生命的并发症。尽管已经有几个个人层面的社会经济因素与这些并发症相关,但尚不清楚区域层面的社会经济贫困的影响。

目的

研究区域贫困程度与低血糖和高血糖危机(即 DKA 或 HHS)急诊就诊或住院风险之间的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究使用了美国私人保险和医疗保险优势受益人的匿名行政索赔数据。分析包括符合糖尿病索赔标准的成年人,其糖尿病诊断时间为 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日。数据分析于 2020 年 11 月 17 日至 2021 年 11 月 11 日进行。

暴露

使用美国社区调查中的 17 个县一级指标,为 2016 年和 2017 年的每个县计算了地区剥夺指数(ADI)。根据索引日期将 ADI 值应用于居住在每个县的患者,并根据县一级 ADI 五分位数(五分位数 1 为剥夺程度最低,五分位数 5 为剥夺程度最高)进行分类。

主要结果和测量

使用负二项回归模型计算了 2016 年至 2019 年期间每个 ADI 五分位数与低血糖和 DKA 或 HHS 主要诊断相关的急诊就诊或住院人数(使用急诊或住院索赔中第一位或主要位置的验证诊断代码确定),并根据患者年龄、性别、健康计划类型、合并症、降血糖药物类型以及县内白人居民的比例进行了调整。

结果

研究人群包括 1116361 人(563943 名女性[50.5%]),平均(SD)年龄为 64.9(13.2)岁。其中,343726 人(30.8%)居住在剥夺程度最低(五分位数 1)的县,121810 人(10.9%)居住在剥夺程度最高(五分位数 5)的县。严重低血糖的调整后发生率从五分位数 1 县的 13.54(95% CI,12.91-14.17)/1000 人年增加到五分位数 5 县的 19.13(95% CI,17.62-20.63)/1000 人年,对应的发病率比为 1.41(95% CI,1.29-1.54;P<0.001)。DKA 或 HHS 的调整后发生率从五分位数 1 县的 7.49(95% CI,6.96-8.02)/1000 人年增加到五分位数 5 县的 8.37(95% CI,7.50-9.23)/1000 人年,对应的发病率比为 1.12(95% CI,1.00-1.25;P=0.049)。

结论和相关性

这项研究发现,生活在高区域剥夺程度的县与严重低血糖和 DKA 或 HHS 的风险增加相关。这些可预防事件在高剥夺程度地区集中发生,表明需要采取干预措施,以解决糖尿病管理和健康的结构性障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e4/8767428/b191d30b89ce/jamanetwopen-e2143597-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e4/8767428/b191d30b89ce/jamanetwopen-e2143597-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e4/8767428/b191d30b89ce/jamanetwopen-e2143597-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Area-Level Socioeconomic Deprivation With Hypoglycemic and Hyperglycemic Crises in US Adults With Diabetes.与美国成年人糖尿病患者的低血糖和高血糖危象相关的地区社会经济剥夺程度的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2143597. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43597.
2
Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Treatment-Related Factors Associated With Hyperglycemic Crises Among Adults With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes in the US From 2014 to 2020.2014 年至 2020 年美国 1 型或 2 型糖尿病成人中与高血糖危象相关的社会人口学、临床和治疗相关因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2123471. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23471.
3
Association of Cumulative Multimorbidity, Glycemic Control, and Medication Use With Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations Among Adults With Diabetes.累积多病共存、血糖控制和药物使用与成年糖尿病患者低血糖相关急诊就诊和住院的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919099. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19099.
4
Evaluation of High-Deductible Health Plans and Acute Glycemic Complications Among Adults With Diabetes.评估高免赔额健康计划与糖尿病成人急性血糖并发症。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250602. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50602.
5
Association Between Area-Level Socioeconomic Deprivation and Diabetes Care Quality in US Primary Care Practices.美国初级医疗实践中地区层面社会经济剥夺与糖尿病护理质量之间的关联
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138438. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38438.
6
Trends in Emergency Department Visits and Inpatient Admissions for Hyperglycemic Crises in Adults With Diabetes in the U.S., 2006-2015.2006-2015 年美国糖尿病成人高血糖危象急诊就诊和住院趋势。
Diabetes Care. 2020 May;43(5):1057-1064. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2449. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
7
Effect of Chronic Pancreatitis on Complications and Mortality in DM Patients: A 10-year Nationwide Cohort Study.慢性胰腺炎对糖尿病患者并发症和死亡率的影响:一项为期 10 年的全国队列研究。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Mar 1;105(3). doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa035.
8
Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Isolated or Combined Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State: A Retrospective, Hospital-Based Cohort Study.单纯糖尿病酮症酸中毒与高血糖高渗综合征患者的临床结局:一项回顾性基于医院的队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):349-357. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1168. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
9
Deintensification of Treatment With Sulfonylurea and Insulin After Severe Hypoglycemia Among Older Adults With Diabetes.老年人糖尿病严重低血糖后磺脲类药物和胰岛素治疗的减量化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2132215. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32215.
10
Sentinel visits in emergency department patients with diabetes mellitus as a warning sign for hyperglycemic emergencies.急诊科糖尿病患者的哨点就诊作为高血糖急症的警示信号。
CJEM. 2018 Mar;20(2):230-237. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.338. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Area deprivation levels of members of a fully digital diabetes prevention program compared to the US population.与美国总体人群相比,全数字化糖尿病预防项目参与者的地区贫困水平。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 16;16:1597945. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1597945. eCollection 2025.
2
Association between bipolar disorder and diabetic ketoacidosis/hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state.双相情感障碍与糖尿病酮症酸中毒/高渗高血糖状态之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08087-y.
3
Social Determinants of Health and Health Literacy in Emergency Patients with Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Treatment-Related Factors Associated With Hyperglycemic Crises Among Adults With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes in the US From 2014 to 2020.2014 年至 2020 年美国 1 型或 2 型糖尿病成人中与高血糖危象相关的社会人口学、临床和治疗相关因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2123471. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23471.
2
Assessing the association between area deprivation index on COVID-19 prevalence: a contrast between rural and urban U.S. jurisdictions.评估地区贫困指数与新冠肺炎患病率之间的关联:美国城乡辖区的对比
AIMS Public Health. 2021 Jul 22;8(3):519-530. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021042. eCollection 2021.
3
糖尿病酮症酸中毒急诊患者的健康社会决定因素与健康素养
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 31;26(3):381-386. doi: 10.5811/westjem.35262.
4
Income and Severe Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病患者的收入与严重低血糖
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2513293. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13293.
5
Looking Beyond the Individual: The Impact of Neighbourhood on Gestational Diabetes.超越个体:邻里环境对妊娠期糖尿病的影响。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2025 May;39(4):346-347. doi: 10.1111/ppe.70009.
6
Rural-urban disparities in hospitalisation for myocardial infarction in systemic lupus erythematosus in the USA.美国系统性红斑狼疮患者心肌梗死住院治疗的城乡差异。
Lupus Sci Med. 2025 Apr 28;12(1):e001516. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2025-001516.
7
Incidence of Frailty, Dementia, and Disability Among Community-Living Older Americans According to County-Level Disadvantage.根据县级不利因素,美国社区居住老年人中衰弱、痴呆和残疾的发病率。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jun;73(6):1847-1856. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19465. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
8
The association of neighborhood-level deprivation with glioblastoma outcomes: a single center cohort study.社区层面的贫困与胶质母细胞瘤预后的关联:一项单中心队列研究。
J Neurooncol. 2025 Jun;173(2):457-467. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-05002-3. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
9
Novel indices of state- and county-level social disadvantage in older Americans and disparities in mortality.美国老年人州和县层面社会劣势的新指标以及死亡率差异。
Health Place. 2025 Mar;92:103438. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103438. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
10
The Association of Neighborhood-Level Deprivation with Glioblastoma Outcomes: A Single Center Cohort Study.社区层面贫困与胶质母细胞瘤预后的关联:一项单中心队列研究。
Res Sq. 2025 Jan 30:rs.3.rs-5913656. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5913656/v1.
Socioeconomic Disparities in Functional Status in a National Sample of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.
类风湿关节炎患者全国样本中功能状态的社会经济差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119400. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19400.
4
Social and Economic Differences in Neighborhood Walkability Across 500 U.S. Cities.500 个美国城市邻里可达性的社会经济差异
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Sep;61(3):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
5
Social Determinants of Health and Structural Inequities-Root Causes of Diabetes Disparities.健康的社会决定因素与结构性不平等——糖尿病差异的根本原因。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(1):11-13. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0060.
6
Casting a Health Equity Lens on Endocrinology and Diabetes.从健康公平视角审视内分泌学和糖尿病。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Mar 25;106(4):e1909-e1916. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa938.
7
How Structural Racism Works - Racist Policies as a Root Cause of U.S. Racial Health Inequities.结构性种族主义如何起作用——种族主义政策是美国种族健康不平等的根源
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):768-773. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2025396. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
8
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.健康与糖尿病的社会决定因素:一项科学综述。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov 2;44(1):258-79. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0053.
9
Measuring Structural Racism and Its Association With BMI.测量结构性种族主义及其与体重指数的关联。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Oct;59(4):530-537. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
10
Area Deprivation Index and Rurality in Relation to Lung Cancer Prevalence and Mortality in a Rural State.农村地区的区域剥夺指数和农村性与肺癌患病率及死亡率的关系
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020 Mar 7;4(4):pkaa011. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa011. eCollection 2020 Aug.