• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深度学习在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后晚期大出血预测中的应用

Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

作者信息

Jia Yuheng, Luosang Gaden, Li Yiming, Wang Jianyong, Li Pengyu, Xiong Tianyuan, Li Yijian, Liao Yanbiao, Zhao Zhengang, Peng Yong, Feng Yuan, Jiang Weili, Li Wenjian, Zhang Xinpei, Yi Zhang, Chen Mao

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

Machine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 12;14:9-20. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S333147. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S333147
PMID:35046728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8763202/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Late major bleeding is one of the main complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to develop a risk prediction model based on deep learning to predict major or life-threatening bleeding complications (MLBCs) after TAVR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study including TAVR patients from West China Hospital of Sichuan University Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Registry (ChiCTR2000033419) between April 17, 2012 and May 27, 2020. A deep learning-based model named BLeNet was developed with 56 features covering baseline, procedural, and post-procedural characteristics. The model was validated with the bootstrap method and evaluated using Harrell's concordance index (c-index), receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and Kaplan-Meier estimate. Captum interpretation library was applied to identify feature importance. The BLeNet model was compared with the traditional Cox proportional hazard (Cox-PH) model and the random survival forest model in the metrics mentioned above.

RESULTS

The BLeNet model outperformed the Cox-PH and random survival forest models significantly in discrimination [optimism-corrected c-index of BLeNet vs Cox-PH vs random survival forest: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.92) vs 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.77) vs 0.70 (95% CI: 0.61-0.74)] and calibration (integrated calibration index of BLeNet vs Cox-PH vs random survival forest: 0.007 vs 0.015 vs 0.019). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, BLeNet model had great performance in stratifying high- and low-bleeding risk patients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Deep learning is a feasible way to build prediction models concerning TAVR prognosis. A dedicated bleeding risk prediction model was developed for TAVR patients to facilitate well-informed clinical decisions.

摘要

目的

晚期严重出血是经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的主要并发症之一。我们旨在开发一种基于深度学习的风险预测模型,以预测TAVR术后的严重或危及生命的出血并发症(MLBCs)。

患者与方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了2012年4月17日至2020年5月27日期间来自四川大学华西医院经导管主动脉瓣置换注册研究(ChiCTR2000033419)的TAVR患者。开发了一种名为BLeNet的基于深度学习的模型,该模型具有56个涵盖基线、手术过程和术后特征的特征。该模型采用自助法进行验证,并使用Harrell一致性指数(c指数)、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线和Kaplan-Meier估计进行评估。应用Captum解释库来确定特征重要性。在上述指标方面,将BLeNet模型与传统的Cox比例风险(Cox-PH)模型和随机生存森林模型进行比较。

结果

在区分能力方面,BLeNet模型显著优于Cox-PH模型和随机生存森林模型[BLeNet与Cox-PH与随机生存森林的乐观校正c指数:0.81(95%CI:0.79-0.92)对0.72(95%CI:0.63-0.77)对0.70(95%CI:0.61-0.74)],在校准方面也是如此[BLeNet与Cox-PH与随机生存森林的综合校准指数:0.007对0.015对0.019]。在Kaplan-Meier分析中,BLeNet模型在对高出血风险和低出血风险患者进行分层方面表现出色(p<0.0001)。

结论

深度学习是构建有关TAVR预后预测模型的可行方法。为TAVR患者开发了一个专门的出血风险预测模型,以促进明智地做出临床决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/8763202/4a019a85f7b1/CLEP-14-9-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/8763202/e7f6372ae46f/CLEP-14-9-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/8763202/98bcab10cab3/CLEP-14-9-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/8763202/472dca9d1ab0/CLEP-14-9-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/8763202/82cf7fa47f41/CLEP-14-9-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/8763202/4a019a85f7b1/CLEP-14-9-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/8763202/e7f6372ae46f/CLEP-14-9-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/8763202/98bcab10cab3/CLEP-14-9-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/8763202/472dca9d1ab0/CLEP-14-9-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/8763202/82cf7fa47f41/CLEP-14-9-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bde/8763202/4a019a85f7b1/CLEP-14-9-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.深度学习在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后晚期大出血预测中的应用
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 12;14:9-20. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S333147. eCollection 2022.
2
Incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of late bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后迟发出血并发症的发生率、预测因素和预后影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):2605-2615. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.052.
3
Bleeding complications after surgical aortic valve replacement compared with transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER I Trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve).经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后出血并发症比较:来自 PARTNER I 试验(经导管主动脉瓣置入术)的见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 25;63(11):1100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.058. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
4
Incidence, Predictive Factors, and Effect of Delirium After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后谵妄的发生率、预测因素及影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan 25;9(2):160-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.037.
5
Analysis of cardiovascular mortality, bleeding, vascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation vs. sinus rhythm undergoing transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVR).经股动脉导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVR)治疗心房颤动与窦性心律患者的心血管死亡率、出血、血管和脑血管事件分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Dec 20;17(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0736-6.
6
Trends in vascular complications and associated treatment strategies following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术后血管并发症的趋势及相关治疗策略。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1313-1324.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.050. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
7
Impact of Primary Hemostasis Disorders on Late Major Bleeding Events among Anticoagulated Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated by TAVR.原发性止血障碍对经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗的抗凝心房颤动患者晚期严重出血事件的影响。
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 31;11(1):212. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010212.
8
Development and Validation of a Practical Model to Identify Patients at Risk of Bleeding After TAVR.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后出血风险患者实用模型的建立与验证。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 14;14(11):1196-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.024.
9
Complications After Self-expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管自膨胀式或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的并发症
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(3):321-330. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Characteristics and outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in China: a report from China aortic valve transcatheter replacement registry (CARRY).中国经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的特点和结局:来自中国主动脉瓣经导管置换登记研究(CARRY)的报告。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Nov 19;134(22):2678-2684. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001882.

引用本文的文献

1
Reply: Re-evaluating Post-TAVR Antithrombotic Strategies in Nonanticoagulated Patients.回复:重新评估非抗凝患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的抗栓策略
JACC Adv. 2025 Jul 7;4(8):101979. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101979.
2
Artificial Intelligence in the Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Aortic Stenosis.人工智能在主动脉瓣狭窄的筛查、诊断及管理中的应用
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 17;25(1):31. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2501031. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Practical Model to Identify Patients at Risk of Bleeding After TAVR.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后出血风险患者实用模型的建立与验证。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 14;14(11):1196-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.024.
2
Predicting Long-Term Mortality in TAVI Patients Using Machine Learning Techniques.使用机器学习技术预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者的长期死亡率
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Apr 16;8(4):44. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8040044.
3
Cox-nnet v2.0: improved neural-network-based survival prediction extended to large-scale EMR data.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的抗栓治疗
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 21;13(13):3636. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133636.
4
CT imaging post-TAVI: Murphy's first law in action-preparing to recognize the unexpected.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的CT成像:墨菲定律在起作用——准备应对意外情况。
Insights Imaging. 2024 Jun 20;15(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01729-1.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Its Current Role and Ongoing Challenges.人工智能在经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的应用:当前作用与面临的挑战
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 25;14(3):261. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14030261.
6
An artificial intelligence method for predicting postoperative urinary incontinence based on multiple anatomic parameters of MRI.一种基于MRI多个解剖参数预测术后尿失禁的人工智能方法。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 20;9(10):e20337. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20337. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Latest Developments in Adapting Deep Learning for Assessing TAVR Procedures and Outcomes.深度学习在评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)手术及结果中的最新进展。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 19;12(14):4774. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144774.
Cox-nnet v2.0:改进的基于神经网络的生存预测,扩展至大规模电子病历数据
Bioinformatics. 2021 Sep 9;37(17):2772-2774. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab046.
4
Artificial Intelligence Trumps TAVI-SCORE and CoreValve Score in Predicting 1-Year Mortality Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.人工智能在预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 1 年死亡率方面优于 TAVI-SCORE 和 CoreValve 评分。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Mar;24:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
5
Machine learning-based risk prediction of intrahospital clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI.基于机器学习的 TAVI 术后患者院内临床结局的风险预测。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Mar;110(3):343-356. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01691-0. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
6
Graphical calibration curves and the integrated calibration index (ICI) for survival models.生存模型的图形校准曲线和综合校准指数(ICI)
Stat Med. 2020 Sep 20;39(21):2714-2742. doi: 10.1002/sim.8570. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
7
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Survival.深度学习模型在非小细胞肺癌生存预测中的建立与验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205842. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5842.
8
The difficult balance between thrombosis and bleeding after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A translational review.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后血栓形成与出血之间的艰难平衡:转化研究综述。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Apr;113(4):263-275. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
Thrombotic Versus Bleeding Risk After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: JACC Review Topic of the Week.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的血栓形成与出血风险:JACC 本周专题述评。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 22;74(16):2088-2101. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1032.
10
Machine Learning Prediction Models for In-Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后院内死亡率的机器学习预测模型。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 22;12(14):1328-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.013.