Rašić Gordana, Lobo Neil F, Jeffrey Gutiérrez Eileen H, Sánchez C Héctor M, Marshall John M
Mosquito Genomics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
Front Genet. 2022 Jan 6;12:780327. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.780327. eCollection 2021.
As gene drive mosquito projects advance from contained laboratory testing to semi-field testing and small-scale field trials, there is a need to assess monitoring requirements to: i) assist with the effective introduction of the gene drive system at field sites, and ii) detect unintended spread of gene drive mosquitoes beyond trial sites, or resistance mechanisms and non-functional effector genes that spread within trial and intervention sites. This is of particular importance for non-localized gene drive projects, as the potential scale of intervention means that monitoring is expected to be more costly than research, development and deployment. Regarding monitoring needs for population replacement systems, lessons may be learned from experiences with -infected mosquitoes, and for population suppression systems, from experiences with releases of genetically sterile male mosquitoes. For population suppression systems, assessing monitoring requirements for tracking population size and detecting rare resistant alleles are priorities, while for population replacement systems, allele frequencies must be tracked, and pressing concerns include detection of gene drive alleles with non-functional effector genes, and resistance of pathogens to functional effector genes. For spread to unintended areas, open questions relate to the optimal density and placement of traps and frequency of sampling in order to detect gene drive alleles, drive-resistant alleles or non-functional effector genes while they can still be effectively managed. Invasive species management programs face similar questions, and lessons may be learned from these experiences. We explore these monitoring needs for gene drive mosquito projects progressing through the phases of pre-release, release and post-release.
随着基因驱动蚊子项目从封闭的实验室测试推进到半野外测试和小规模田间试验,有必要评估监测要求,以便:i)协助在田间地点有效引入基因驱动系统;ii)检测基因驱动蚊子在试验地点以外的意外扩散,或在试验和干预地点内传播的抗性机制和无功能效应基因。这对于非本地化基因驱动项目尤为重要,因为潜在的干预规模意味着监测成本预计将高于研究、开发和部署。关于种群替代系统的监测需求,可以从感染蚊子的经验中吸取教训,而对于种群抑制系统,可以从释放转基因不育雄蚊的经验中吸取教训。对于种群抑制系统,评估跟踪种群规模和检测罕见抗性等位基因的监测要求是优先事项,而对于种群替代系统,必须跟踪等位基因频率,紧迫的问题包括检测具有无功能效应基因的基因驱动等位基因,以及病原体对功能效应基因的抗性。对于扩散到非预期区域的情况,尚未解决的问题涉及诱捕器的最佳密度和放置位置以及采样频率,以便在基因驱动等位基因、驱动抗性等位基因或无功能效应基因仍可有效管理时进行检测。入侵物种管理项目也面临类似问题,可以从这些经验中吸取教训。我们探讨了基因驱动蚊子项目在释放前、释放和释放后阶段的这些监测需求。