Do Monica Lynn, Papafragou Anna, Trueswell John
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.
Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.
Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan;46(1):e13077. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13077.
We investigate the extent to which pragmatic versus conceptual factors can affect a speaker's decision to mention or omit different components of an event. In the two experiments, we demonstrate the special role of pragmatic factors related to audience design in speakers' decisions to mention conceptually "peripheral" event components, such as sources (i.e., starting points) in source-goal motion events (e.g., a baby crawling from a crib to a toybox). In particular, we found that pragmatic factors related to audience design could not only drive the decision to omit sources from mention, but could also motivate speakers to mention sources more often than needed. By contrast, speaker's decisions to talk about goals did not appear to be fundamentally driven by pragmatic factors in communication. We also manipulated the animacy of the figure in motion and found that participants in our studies treated both animate and inanimate source-goal motion events in the same way, both linguistically and in memory. We discuss the implications of our work for message generation across different communicative contexts and for future work on the topic of audience design.
我们研究了语用因素与概念因素在多大程度上会影响说话者提及或省略事件不同组成部分的决定。在这两个实验中,我们证明了与受众设计相关的语用因素在说话者决定提及概念上“边缘”的事件组成部分(例如源 - 目标运动事件中的源点,即起点,如婴儿从婴儿床爬到玩具箱)时所起的特殊作用。具体而言,我们发现与受众设计相关的语用因素不仅能促使说话者决定省略对源点的提及,还能促使他们比必要时更频繁地提及源点。相比之下,说话者谈论目标的决定似乎并非从根本上由交流中的语用因素驱动。我们还操纵了运动中人物的动物性,发现我们研究中的参与者在语言和记忆方面对有生命和无生命的源 - 目标运动事件的处理方式相同。我们讨论了我们的研究对于不同交流情境下信息生成以及未来受众设计主题研究的意义。