Suppr超能文献

健康领域的风险和资产策略:自 20 世纪初以来生物医学、生命和环境科学文献中的优先事项。快速综述。

Risk and asset-based strategies in health: priorities in biomedical, life and environmental science literature since the early twentieth century. A rapid review.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Poitiers, 6 rue de la Milétrie, TSA 51115, 86073, Poitiers Cedex, France.

Clinical Investigation Center, INSERM, 2 rue de la Milétrie 1402, 86021, Poitiers, France.

出版信息

Environ Health. 2022 Jan 29;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00833-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In biomedical, life or environmental science research, two different strategies exist depending on the starting point of the researchers: "what makes us ill? " or "what makes us healthy?". Indeed, a risk-based strategy (RBS) attempts to minimize risk factors increasing the likelihood of developing a disease, while an asset-based strategy (ABS) attempts to promote and strengthen the factors that support good health and wellbeing. We provided an up-to-date overview of both research strategies in peer-reviewed scientific literature, in the fields of human health, animal and plant health and ecosystem health, to fit with the One Health framework. More particularly, we focused on human health by studying publications related to the COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic.

DESIGN

A rapid review of research science literature was carried out to identify in the PubMed/MEDLINE database the proportion of peer-reviewed articles adopting either a RBS or an ABS, in the main global environment fields from January 01, 1900 to December 31, 2019 and, related to COVID-19, from December 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020.

RESULTS

The number of published articles resulting from our search was 1,957,905, including 91.3% with an RBS and 8.7% with an ABS. When examining each field, we found that only 10.5% of human health articles deal with ABS, 5.5% for animal health, 2.2% for ecosystem health, 1.0% for plant health and 2.7% for environmental media. We noted that articles adopting both strategies were published in all health fields. Among the articles concerning COVID-19, 5,854 (55.9%), 542 articles (5.2%) adopted RBS and ABS, respectively, while 4069 (38.9%) simultaneously presenting both strategies.

CONCLUSION

Our results have allowed us to take stock of the biomedical research strategies prioritized during the twentieth century. It seems highly likely that the two strategies we have analyzed can now be chosen in such a way as to promote a balance in public health measures, at every level to guide One Health interventions aimed at helping people, animals, and plants to lead healthier lives.

摘要

背景

在生物医学、生命或环境科学研究中,研究人员有两种不同的策略:“是什么让我们生病?”或“是什么让我们健康?”。实际上,基于风险的策略(RBS)试图最小化增加疾病发生可能性的风险因素,而基于资产的策略(ABS)则试图促进和加强支持良好健康和福祉的因素。我们在同行评议的科学文献中提供了这两种研究策略的最新概述,涵盖人类健康、动植物健康和生态系统健康领域,以符合“同一健康”框架。更具体地说,我们通过研究大流行初期与 COVID-19 相关的出版物,重点关注人类健康。

设计

对研究科学文献进行了快速审查,以确定在 PubMed/MEDLINE 数据库中,从 1900 年 1 月 1 日到 1999 年 12 月 31 日,在主要的全球环境领域中,采用 RBS 或 ABS 的同行评议文章的比例,以及与 COVID-19 相关的文章,从 2019 年 12 月 1 日到 2020 年 5 月 31 日。

结果

我们的搜索结果产生了 1,957,905 篇已发表的文章,其中 91.3%采用了 RBS,8.7%采用了 ABS。当检查每个领域时,我们发现只有 10.5%的人类健康文章涉及 ABS,5.5%的动物健康文章,2.2%的生态系统健康文章,1.0%的植物健康文章和 2.7%的环境媒体文章。我们注意到,采用这两种策略的文章都发表在所有健康领域。在涉及 COVID-19 的文章中,5,854 篇(55.9%)、542 篇(5.2%)分别采用了 RBS 和 ABS,而 4069 篇(38.9%)同时采用了这两种策略。

结论

我们的结果使我们能够了解二十世纪优先考虑的生物医学研究策略。这两种我们分析的策略很可能现在可以被选择,以在公共卫生措施的每一个层面上促进平衡,以指导“同一健康”干预措施,旨在帮助人类、动物和植物过上更健康的生活。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7c/8801071/b2e323611921/12940_2022_833_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验