Carnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.
England Performance Unit, Rugby Football League, Leeds, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 31;17(1):e0263093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263093. eCollection 2022.
This study investigated differences in external training load between microcycle lengths and its variation between microcycles, players, and head coaches. Commonly used external training load variables including total-, high-speed- (5-7 m∙s-1), and sprint-distance (> 7 m∙s-1) alongside combined high acceleration and deceleration distance (> 2 m∙s-2). Which were also expressed relative to time were collected using microtechnology within a repeated measures design from 54 male rugby league players from one Super League team over four seasons. 4337 individual observations across ninety-one separate microcycles and six individual microcycle lengths (5 to 10 day) were included. Linear mixed effects models established the differences in training load between microcycle-length and the variation between-microcycles, players and head coaches. The largest magnitude of difference in training load was seen when comparing 5-day with 9-day (ES = 0.31 to 0.53) and 10-day (ES = 0.19 to 0.66) microcycles. The greatest number of differences between microcycles were observed in high- (ES = 0.3 to 0.53) and sprint-speed (ES = 0.2 to 0.42) variables. Between-microcycle variability ranged between 11% to 35% dependent on training load variable. Training load also varied between players (5-65%) and head coaches (6-20%) with most variability existing within high-speed (19-43%) and sprinting (19-65%). Overall, differences in training load between microcycle lengths exist, likely due to manipulation of session duration. Furthermore, training load varies between microcycle, player and head coach.
本研究调查了微周期长度之间以及微周期之间、运动员和主教练之间外部训练负荷的差异。常用的外部训练负荷变量包括总负荷、高速(5-7m/s)和冲刺距离(>7m/s),以及结合高加速度和减速度距离(>2m/s2)。这些变量使用微技术在重复测量设计中收集,涉及来自一个超级联赛团队的 54 名男性橄榄球联盟球员,历时四个赛季。共包括九十一次独立微周期和六个单独微周期长度(5-10 天)的 4337 个个体观察值。线性混合效应模型确定了微周期长度之间的训练负荷差异以及微周期之间、运动员和主教练之间的变异。当比较 5 天和 9 天(ES=0.31-0.53)和 10 天(ES=0.19-0.66)微周期时,训练负荷的差异最大。在高速(ES=0.3-0.53)和冲刺速度(ES=0.2-0.42)变量中观察到的微周期之间的差异最大。微周期之间的变异性在 11%-35%之间,取决于训练负荷变量。训练负荷也在运动员(5-65%)和主教练(6-20%)之间存在差异,其中高速(19-43%)和冲刺(19-65%)之间的差异最大。总之,微周期长度之间的训练负荷存在差异,这可能是由于训练持续时间的改变。此外,训练负荷在微周期、运动员和主教练之间存在差异。