Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
G3 (Bethesda). 2022 Mar 4;12(3). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac011.
The search for quantitative trait loci that explain complex traits such as yield and drought tolerance has been ongoing in all crops. Methods such as biparental quantitative trait loci mapping and genome-wide association studies each have their own advantages and limitations. Multiparent advanced generation intercross populations contain more recombination events and genetic diversity than biparental mapping populations and are better able to estimate effect sizes of rare alleles than association mapping populations. Here, we discuss the results of using a multiparent advanced generation intercross population of doubled haploid maize lines created from 16 diverse founders to perform quantitative trait loci mapping. We compare 3 models that assume bi-allelic, founder, and ancestral haplotype allelic states for quantitative trait loci. The 3 methods have differing power to detect quantitative trait loci for a variety of agronomic traits. Although the founder approach finds the most quantitative trait loci, all methods are able to find unique quantitative trait loci, suggesting that each model has advantages for traits with different genetic architectures. A closer look at a well-characterized flowering time quantitative trait loci, qDTA8, which contains vgt1, highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each method and suggests a potential epistatic interaction. Overall, our results reinforce the importance of considering different approaches to analyzing genotypic datasets, and shows the limitations of binary SNP data for identifying multiallelic quantitative trait loci.
在所有作物中,寻找解释产量和耐旱性等复杂性状的数量性状位点的研究一直在进行。双亲数量性状位点作图和全基因组关联研究等方法各有优缺点。多亲高级世代互交群体比双亲作图群体包含更多的重组事件和遗传多样性,并且比关联作图群体更能估计稀有等位基因的效应大小。在这里,我们讨论了使用由 16 个不同的供体创建的双单倍体玉米系的多亲高级世代互交群体进行数量性状位点作图的结果。我们比较了假设数量性状位点的双等位基因、供体和祖先单倍型等位基因状态的 3 种模型。这 3 种方法在检测各种农艺性状的数量性状位点方面具有不同的能力。尽管供体方法发现了最多的数量性状位点,但所有方法都能够找到独特的数量性状位点,这表明每种方法在遗传结构不同的性状上都有优势。对一个特征良好的开花时间数量性状位点 qDTA8 的更深入研究,其中包含 vgt1,突出了每种方法的优缺点,并暗示了潜在的上位性相互作用。总的来说,我们的结果强调了考虑分析基因型数据集的不同方法的重要性,并表明二进制 SNP 数据在识别多等位基因数量性状位点方面的局限性。