• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神病治疗中的“泰提库提滑稽剧”的历史意义:一种反审查视角》。

The Historical Significance of Titicut Follies in Psychiatric Treatment: An Anti-Censorship Perspective.

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Forensic Psychiatry, Alberta Hospital Edmonton, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2023 Jun;126(3):1130-1142. doi: 10.1177/00332941211061080. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1177/00332941211061080
PMID:35100520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10173351/
Abstract

Works of art and information judged as obscene can be censored or banned. This brief review evaluates the costs and benefits of censorship and the banning of artwork and information. In the history of psychology, Frederick Wiseman's film epitomizes the disadvantages of concealing art content. Despite protecting the privacy of patients, the ban of delayed the reform of psychiatric treatment practices and hospitals. The decision to censor or ban artistic and scientific information can result in the loss of knowledge and potential improvements to social, political, and economic institution practices.

摘要

艺术品和被判定为淫秽的信息可以被审查或禁止。本简要回顾评估了审查和禁止艺术品和信息的成本和收益。在心理学史上,弗雷德里克·怀斯曼的电影《提提卡失序记事》就体现了隐藏艺术内容的弊端。尽管保护了患者的隐私,但该禁令却延迟了精神病治疗实践和医院的改革。审查或禁止艺术和科学信息的决定可能导致知识的丧失以及对社会、政治和经济制度实践的潜在改进。

相似文献

1
The Historical Significance of Titicut Follies in Psychiatric Treatment: An Anti-Censorship Perspective.《精神病治疗中的“泰提库提滑稽剧”的历史意义:一种反审查视角》。
Psychol Rep. 2023 Jun;126(3):1130-1142. doi: 10.1177/00332941211061080. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
2
The banning of Frederick Wiseman's movie, "Titicut Follies"--censoring the evidence.禁止弗雷德里克·怀斯曼的电影《提提卡失乐园》——审查证据。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2003 Apr-Jun;12(2):122-4. doi: 10.1097/00019514-200304000-00008.
3
The Titicut Follies: the forgotten story of a case of psychiatric censorship.《提提卡失序记事》:一个精神科审查案例被遗忘的故事。
Hist Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;18(1):123-5. doi: 10.1177/0957154X07073814.
4
Blasphemy or art: what art should be censored and who wants to censor it?亵渎还是艺术:哪些艺术应该被审查,以及谁想审查它?
J Psychol. 2014 Jan-Feb;148(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2012.730563.
5
[Chance meeting of psychiatry and art on the "dissecting table"].[精神病学与艺术在“解剖台”上的邂逅]
Psychiatr Hung. 2015;30(2):145-66.
6
Obscenity and homosexual depiction in Japan.日本的淫秽及同性恋描绘。
J Homosex. 2000;39(3-4):127-47. doi: 10.1300/J082v39n03_05.
7
Teaching medicine through film: Wiseman's medical trilogy revisited.通过电影教授医学:怀斯曼医学三部曲再探。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1819-0.
8
Titicut Follies: patients' rights and institutional reform.《提提卡失序记事》:患者权利与机构改革
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1989 Jul;40(7):679-80. doi: 10.1176/ps.40.7.679.
9
Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda.科学家的科学审查行为背后的亲社会动机:一种观点和研究议程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 28;120(48):e2301642120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301642120. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
10
Book bans in political context: Evidence from US schools.政治背景下的书籍禁令:来自美国学校的证据。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 11;3(6):pgae197. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae197. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Deinstitutionalization Through Optimism: The Community Mental Health Act of 1963.通过乐观主义实现去机构化:1963年《社区精神卫生法》
Am J Psychiatry Resid J. 2021 Jun;16(4):6-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp-rj.2021.160404. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
2
Combining interventions to reduce the spread of viral misinformation.结合干预措施以减少病毒错误信息的传播。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Oct;6(10):1372-1380. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01388-6. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
3
The Werther Effect, the Papageno Effect or No Effect? A Literature Review.维特效应、帕帕盖诺效应还是无效应?文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;18(5):2396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052396.
4
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.将注意力转移到准确性上可以减少网络上的错误信息。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):590-595. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
5
"This show hits really close to home on so many levels": An analysis of Reddit comments about HBO's Euphoria to understand viewers' experiences of and reactions to substance use and mental illness.“这部剧在很多层面上都非常贴近现实”:对 HBO 电视剧《亢奋》的 Reddit 评论进行分析,以了解观众对药物使用和精神疾病的体验和反应。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Mar 1;220:108468. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108468. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
6
Health care providers and people with mental illness: An integrative review on anti-stigma interventions.医护人员和精神疾病患者:反污名干预措施的综合述评。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;67(7):840-853. doi: 10.1177/0020764020985891. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
7
Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention.社交媒体上抗击 COVID-19 错误信息:可扩展的准确性提示干预的实验证据。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;31(7):770-780. doi: 10.1177/0956797620939054. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
8
Location of Power within Psychiatry: A Fifty-Year Journey as Represented in Film.精神病学中的权力位置:电影中五十年来的呈现
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020 May;41(5):378-384. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2019.1675829. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
9
Problems posed by the Werther effect as a 'net effect': a comment on recent scholarly work on the effects of .作为“净效应”提出的韦特效应问题:对近期关于 的影响之学术研究的评论。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;217(6):665-666. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.197.
10
Editorial: One Reason Why Not.社论:一个不这样做的理由。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;59(2):216-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.09.025. Epub 2019 Oct 4.