Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):1653. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05786-8.
Indications of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) are still debatable, particularly in patients with cancer. Prediction of the prognosis of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in patients with cancer receiving ECPR is important given the increasing prevalence and survival rate of cancer. We compared the neurologic outcomes and survival rates of IHCA patients with and without cancer receiving ECPR. Data from the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation registry between 2015 and 2019 were used in a retrospective manner. The primary outcome was 6-month good neurologic outcome, defined as a Cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2. The secondary outcomes were 1- and 3-month good neurologic outcome, and 6-month survival. Among 247 IHCA patients with ECPR, 43 had active cancer. The 6-month good neurologic outcome rate was 27.9% and 32.4% in patients with and without active cancer, respectively (P > 0.05). Good neurologic outcomes at 1-month (30.2% vs. 20.6%) and 3-month (30.2% vs. 28.4%), and the survival rate at 6-month (39.5% vs. 36.5%) were not significantly different (all P > 0.05) Active cancer was not associated with 6-month good neurologic outcome by logistic regression analyses. Therefore, patients with IHCA should not be excluded from ECPR solely for the presence of cancer itself.
体外心肺复苏 (ECPR) 的适应证仍存在争议,尤其是在癌症患者中。鉴于癌症的发病率和存活率不断提高,预测接受 ECPR 的癌症住院心搏骤停 (IHCA) 患者的预后非常重要。我们比较了接受 ECPR 的 IHCA 合并和不合并癌症患者的神经结局和生存率。回顾性使用了 2015 年至 2019 年体外膜氧合登记处的数据。主要结局是 6 个月时的良好神经结局,定义为脑功能分类评分 1 或 2。次要结局是 1 个月和 3 个月时的良好神经结局,以及 6 个月时的生存率。在 247 例接受 ECPR 的 IHCA 患者中,43 例患有活动性癌症。有活动性癌症和无活动性癌症患者的 6 个月良好神经结局率分别为 27.9%和 32.4%(P>0.05)。1 个月时(30.2%比 20.6%)和 3 个月时(30.2%比 28.4%)的良好神经结局以及 6 个月时的生存率(39.5%比 36.5%)差异无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。逻辑回归分析显示,活动性癌症与 6 个月时的良好神经结局无关。因此,不应仅仅因为癌症本身的存在而将 IHCA 患者排除在 ECPR 之外。