Lipman R S, Covi L, Rickels K, McNair D M, Downing R, Kahn R J, Lasseter V K, Faden V
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Jan;43(1):68-77. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800010070009.
We randomly assigned 425 outpatients, independently classified as primarily depressed by two trained psychiatrists, to double-blind treatment with Imipramine hydrochloride, chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride, or placebo. Those patients who remained at least moderately depressed (following a two-week placebo washout period) were treated for an additional eight weeks. An endpoint analysis of 387 patients who completed two or more weeks of medication disclosed early therapeutic advantages of chlordiazepoxide. By week 4 of treatment, however, imipramine produced more improvement than did placebo and chlordiazepoxide. By six and eight weeks a general, marked therapeutic advantage was found for imipramine relative to placebo and to chlordiazepoxide on measures of depression, anxiety, anger-hostility, interpersonal sensitivity, and global improvement. Chlordiazepoxide-treated patients generally did significantly better on sleep difficulty but significantly worse on anger-hostility and interpersonal sensitivity than did imipramine- or placebo-treated patients.
我们将425名由两名经过培训的精神科医生独立判定为主要患有抑郁症的门诊患者随机分配,接受盐酸丙咪嗪、盐酸氯氮卓或安慰剂的双盲治疗。那些至少仍有中度抑郁症状的患者(经过两周的安慰剂洗脱期后)再接受八周的治疗。对387名完成两周或更长时间药物治疗的患者进行的终点分析显示,氯氮卓具有早期治疗优势。然而,在治疗第4周时,丙咪嗪比安慰剂和氯氮卓产生了更大的改善。到第6周和第8周时,在抑郁、焦虑、愤怒-敌意、人际敏感性和总体改善等指标上,相对于安慰剂和氯氮卓,丙咪嗪具有明显的总体治疗优势。接受氯氮卓治疗的患者在睡眠困难方面总体上明显比接受丙咪嗪或安慰剂治疗的患者表现更好,但在愤怒-敌意和人际敏感性方面则明显更差。