Agachi Elena, Bijmolt Tammo H A, Mierau Jochen O, van Ittersum Koert
Department of Marketing, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Feb 2;9(1):e32112. doi: 10.2196/32112.
Socioeconomic disparities in the adoption of preventive health programs represent a well-known challenge, with programs delivered via the web serving as a potential solution. The preventive health program examined in this study is a large-scale, open-access web-based platform operating in the Netherlands, which aims to improve the health behaviors and wellness of its participants.
This study aims to examine the differences in the adoption of the website and mobile app of a web-based preventive health program across socioeconomic groups.
The 83,466 participants in this longitudinal, nonexperimental study were individuals who had signed up for the health program between July 2012 and September 2019. The rate of program adoption per delivery means was estimated using the Prentice, Williams, and Peterson Gap-Time model, with the measure of neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES) used to distinguish between population segments with different socioeconomic characteristics. Registration to the health program was voluntary and free, and not within a controlled study setting, allowing the observation of the true rate of adoption.
The estimation results indicate that program adoption across socioeconomic groups varies depending on the program's delivery means. For the website, higher NSES groups have a higher likelihood of program adoption compared with the lowest NSES group (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05). For the mobile app, the opposite holds: higher NSES groups have a lower likelihood of program adoption compared with the lowest NSES group (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97).
Promoting preventive health programs using mobile apps can help to increase program adoption among the lowest socioeconomic segments. Given the increasing use of mobile phones among disadvantaged population groups, structuring future health interventions to include mobile apps as means of delivery can support the stride toward diminishing health disparities.
在采用预防性健康计划方面存在的社会经济差异是一个众所周知的挑战,通过网络提供的计划可能是一种解决方案。本研究中所考察的预防性健康计划是一个在荷兰运营的大规模、开放获取的基于网络的平台,旨在改善参与者的健康行为和健康状况。
本研究旨在考察基于网络的预防性健康计划的网站和移动应用在不同社会经济群体中的采用差异。
这项纵向非实验性研究的83466名参与者是在2012年7月至2019年9月期间报名参加该健康计划的个人。使用普伦蒂斯、威廉姆斯和彼得森间隔时间模型估计每种交付方式的计划采用率,并用邻里社会经济地位(NSES)指标来区分具有不同社会经济特征的人群。参加健康计划是自愿且免费的,且不在受控研究环境中,从而能够观察到实际的采用率。
估计结果表明,不同社会经济群体对计划的采用情况因计划的交付方式而异。对于网站,与最低NSES组相比,较高NSES组采用计划的可能性更高(风险比1.03,95%置信区间1.01 - 1.05)。对于移动应用,情况则相反:与最低NSES组相比,较高NSES组采用计划的可能性更低(风险比0.94,95%置信区间0.91 - 0.97)。
使用移动应用推广预防性健康计划有助于提高最低社会经济阶层对计划的采用率。鉴于弱势群体中手机使用的增加,将未来的健康干预措施构建为包括移动应用作为交付方式,可以支持朝着减少健康差距迈进。