Safavi Seyed Mohammadreza, Farzan Arash, Younessian Farnaz, Baghban Alireza Akbarzadeh
Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Orthodontics, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, School of Dentistry, Zanjan, Iran.
Turk J Orthod. 2021 Sep;34(3):182-188. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.21075.
Quality assessment is an essential part of orthodontic treatment. Most of the current indices are essentially based on occlusal assessment. However, an ideal occlusion is only one aspect of an ideal treatment. The aim of this article is to introduce a new prioritized commitment-based clinical assessment (PCCA) method and present its reliability and linear correlation test in comparison with the comprehensive clinical outcome assessment (CCA).
One hundred treated cases were scored with the conventional assessment tool--the CCA--and the newly developed assessment tool--the PCCA--with 2 calibrated examiners at 2 different time intervals. These cases were randomly selected including equal numbers of the main malocclusions managed with fixed conventional edgewise appliances within the past 3 years and had complete pre-treatment and post-treatment routine records. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the intra- examiner repeatability of the total scores of both methods. Pearson's correlation coefficients were computed to assess the linear relationships between the CCA and PCCA scores.
The intra-examiner reliability assessed for CCA and PCCA showed high repeatability for both examiners (ICC: 0.93 and 0.945, respectively). The inter-examiner reliability values for CCA and PCCA, assessed by ICC, were 0.84 and 0.96, respectively. The linear correlation between the 2 methods, assessed by comparing the mean score of each case by the 2 examiners was significant, at 0.01.
The PCCA method can be used for quality assessment in treated orthodontic patients. The preliminary test of the new method presented good inter- and intra-observer agreements and a significant linear correlation with the CCA method.
质量评估是正畸治疗的重要组成部分。当前大多数指标基本上基于咬合评估。然而,理想的咬合只是理想治疗的一个方面。本文旨在介绍一种新的基于优先承诺的临床评估(PCCA)方法,并与综合临床结果评估(CCA)相比,展示其可靠性和线性相关性测试。
100例已治疗病例由2名经过校准的检查者在2个不同时间间隔,使用传统评估工具——CCA以及新开发的评估工具——PCCA进行评分。这些病例是随机选取的,包括过去3年内使用固定传统方丝弓矫治器治疗的主要错颌畸形病例,且有完整的治疗前和治疗后常规记录。组内相关系数(ICC)用于评估两种方法总分在检查者内部的可重复性。计算Pearson相关系数以评估CCA和PCCA评分之间的线性关系。
对CCA和PCCA评估的检查者内部可靠性显示,两名检查者的重复性均很高(ICC分别为0.93和0.945)。通过ICC评估的CCA和PCCA的检查者间可靠性值分别为0.84和0.96。通过比较两名检查者对每个病例的平均评分评估的两种方法之间的线性相关性在0.01水平上具有显著性。
PCCA方法可用于正畸治疗患者的质量评估。新方法的初步测试显示出良好的观察者间和观察者内一致性,以及与CCA方法的显著线性相关性。