Suppr超能文献

对《对空洞标准的回应——颠覆OSAC标准制定过程》的回复

Reply to Response to Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.

作者信息

Morrison Geoffrey Stewart, Neumann Cedric, Geoghegan Patrick Henry, Edmond Gary, Grant Tim, Ostrum R Brent, Roberts Paul, Saks Michael, Syndercombe Court Denise, Thompson William C, Zabell Sandy

机构信息

Forensic Data Science Laboratory & Forensic Speech Science Laboratory, Computer Science Department & Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Forensic Evaluation Ltd, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 May 3;3:100149. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149
PMID:35112074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8790162/
Abstract

This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) "Vacuous standards - subversion of the OSAC standards-development process" https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.

摘要

这封致编辑的信是对穆罕默德等人（2021年）https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145的回应，而穆罕默德等人的文章又是对莫里森等人（2020年）“空洞的标准——对OSAC标准制定过程的颠覆”https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005的回应。

相似文献

1
Reply to Response to Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 May 3;3:100149. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149. eCollection 2021.
2
Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Jun 30;2:206-209. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005. eCollection 2020.
3
Response to vacuous standards subversion of the OSAC standards development process.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Mar 16;3:100145. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145. eCollection 2021.
4
Authors' response: Letter to the Editor concerning OCRA as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):439-440. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3748.
5
Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from Mauritanian Coral Mounds.
Zootaxa. 2020 Nov 16;4878(3):zootaxa.4878.3.2. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4878.3.2.
6
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746.
7
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
8
Commentary on: I. Dror, N Scurich "(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science" Forensic Science International: Synergy 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.006.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Dec 21;2:701-702. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.10.004. eCollection 2020.
9
The Purpose, Process, and Advancement of Forensic Nursing Standards.
J Forensic Nurs. 2024;20(3):160-165. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000488. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
10
Authors' response: Mezei et al's "Comments on a recent case-control study of malignant mesothelioma of the pericardium and the tunica vaginalis testis".
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):87-89. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3910. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 May 18;5:100270. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100270. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: "Inconclusive" decisions and the structure of error rate studies.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Apr 17;3:100147. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100147. eCollection 2021.
2
Response to vacuous standards subversion of the OSAC standards development process.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Mar 16;3:100145. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145. eCollection 2021.
3
Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Jun 30;2:206-209. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验