• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对《对空洞标准的回应——颠覆OSAC标准制定过程》的回复

Reply to Response to Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.

作者信息

Morrison Geoffrey Stewart, Neumann Cedric, Geoghegan Patrick Henry, Edmond Gary, Grant Tim, Ostrum R Brent, Roberts Paul, Saks Michael, Syndercombe Court Denise, Thompson William C, Zabell Sandy

机构信息

Forensic Data Science Laboratory & Forensic Speech Science Laboratory, Computer Science Department & Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Forensic Evaluation Ltd, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 May 3;3:100149. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149
PMID:35112074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8790162/
Abstract

This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) "Vacuous standards - subversion of the OSAC standards-development process" https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.

摘要

这封致编辑的信是对穆罕默德等人(2021年)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145的回应,而穆罕默德等人的文章又是对莫里森等人(2020年)“空洞的标准——对OSAC标准制定过程的颠覆”https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005的回应。

相似文献

1
Reply to Response to Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.对《对空洞标准的回应——颠覆OSAC标准制定过程》的回复
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 May 3;3:100149. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149. eCollection 2021.
2
Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.空洞的标准——对OSAC标准制定过程的颠覆。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Jun 30;2:206-209. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005. eCollection 2020.
3
Response to vacuous standards subversion of the OSAC standards development process.对空洞标准的回应——对OSAC标准制定过程的颠覆。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Mar 16;3:100145. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145. eCollection 2021.
4
Authors' response: Letter to the Editor concerning OCRA as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.作者回复:关于 OCRA 作为生物力学风险因素 ISO 标准中首选方法的致编辑的信。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):439-440. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3748.
5
Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from Mauritanian Coral Mounds.来自毛里塔尼亚珊瑚丘的水螅虫纲动物(刺胞动物门,水螅虫纲)。
Zootaxa. 2020 Nov 16;4878(3):zootaxa.4878.3.2. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4878.3.2.
6
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.OCRA 方法评估上肢生物力学过载风险的科学基础,作为 ISO 生物力学风险因素标准中的首选方法。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746.
7
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
8
Commentary on: I. Dror, N Scurich "(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science" Forensic Science International: Synergy 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.006.关于I. 德罗尔、N. 斯库里奇《法医学中科学测量的(误)用》的评论,《法医学国际:协同作用》2020年,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.006 。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Dec 21;2:701-702. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.10.004. eCollection 2020.
9
The Purpose, Process, and Advancement of Forensic Nursing Standards.法医护理标准的目的、过程和进展。
J Forensic Nurs. 2024;20(3):160-165. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000488. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
10
Authors' response: Mezei et al's "Comments on a recent case-control study of malignant mesothelioma of the pericardium and the tunica vaginalis testis".作者回复:Mezei 等人的“对近期心包恶性间皮瘤和睾丸鞘膜病例对照研究的评论”。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):87-89. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3910. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science.推动法医证据评估的范式转变:法医数据科学的兴起。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 May 18;5:100270. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100270. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: "Inconclusive" decisions and the structure of error rate studies.法医学与排中律:“不确定”的决策以及错误率研究的结构
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Apr 17;3:100147. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100147. eCollection 2021.
2
Response to vacuous standards subversion of the OSAC standards development process.对空洞标准的回应——对OSAC标准制定过程的颠覆。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Mar 16;3:100145. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145. eCollection 2021.
3
Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.空洞的标准——对OSAC标准制定过程的颠覆。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Jun 30;2:206-209. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005. eCollection 2020.