对《对空洞标准的回应——颠覆OSAC标准制定过程》的回复
Reply to Response to Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.
作者信息
Morrison Geoffrey Stewart, Neumann Cedric, Geoghegan Patrick Henry, Edmond Gary, Grant Tim, Ostrum R Brent, Roberts Paul, Saks Michael, Syndercombe Court Denise, Thompson William C, Zabell Sandy
机构信息
Forensic Data Science Laboratory & Forensic Speech Science Laboratory, Computer Science Department & Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Forensic Evaluation Ltd, Birmingham, UK.
出版信息
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 May 3;3:100149. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149. eCollection 2021.
Abstract
This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) "Vacuous standards - subversion of the OSAC standards-development process" https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.
相似文献
1
Reply to Response to Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.对《对空洞标准的回应——颠覆OSAC标准制定过程》的回复
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 May 3;3:100149. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149. eCollection 2021.
2
Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.空洞的标准——对OSAC标准制定过程的颠覆。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Jun 30;2:206-209. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005. eCollection 2020.
3
Response to vacuous standards subversion of the OSAC standards development process.对空洞标准的回应——对OSAC标准制定过程的颠覆。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Mar 16;3:100145. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145. eCollection 2021.
4
Authors' response: Letter to the Editor concerning OCRA as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.作者回复：关于 OCRA 作为生物力学风险因素 ISO 标准中首选方法的致编辑的信。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):439-440. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3748.
5
Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from Mauritanian Coral Mounds.来自毛里塔尼亚珊瑚丘的水螅虫纲动物（刺胞动物门，水螅虫纲）。
Zootaxa. 2020 Nov 16;4878(3):zootaxa.4878.3.2. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4878.3.2.
6
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.OCRA 方法评估上肢生物力学过载风险的科学基础，作为 ISO 生物力学风险因素标准中的首选方法。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746.
7
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信：职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
8
Commentary on: I. Dror, N Scurich "(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science" Forensic Science International: Synergy 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.006.关于I. 德罗尔、N. 斯库里奇《法医学中科学测量的（误）用》的评论，《法医学国际：协同作用》2020年，https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.006 。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Dec 21;2:701-702. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.10.004. eCollection 2020.
9
The Purpose, Process, and Advancement of Forensic Nursing Standards.法医护理标准的目的、过程和进展。
J Forensic Nurs. 2024;20(3):160-165. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000488. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
10
Authors' response: Mezei et al's "Comments on a recent case-control study of malignant mesothelioma of the pericardium and the tunica vaginalis testis".作者回复：Mezei 等人的“对近期心包恶性间皮瘤和睾丸鞘膜病例对照研究的评论”。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):87-89. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3910. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
引用本文的文献
1
Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science.推动法医证据评估的范式转变：法医数据科学的兴起。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 May 18;5:100270. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100270. eCollection 2022.
本文引用的文献
1
Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: "Inconclusive" decisions and the structure of error rate studies.法医学与排中律：“不确定”的决策以及错误率研究的结构
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Apr 17;3:100147. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100147. eCollection 2021.
2
Response to vacuous standards subversion of the OSAC standards development process.对空洞标准的回应——对OSAC标准制定过程的颠覆。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Mar 16;3:100145. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145. eCollection 2021.
3
Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process.空洞的标准——对OSAC标准制定过程的颠覆。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Jun 30;2:206-209. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005. eCollection 2020.
Zotero 插件