Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, School of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China.
Lanzhou University second hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Acta Diabetol. 2022 Apr;59(4):443-459. doi: 10.1007/s00592-021-01829-0. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
This study aims to determine the relationship between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and cognitive dysfunction as well as explores the effects of DR on different cognitive domains.
A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang data, CBM, CNKI, and VIP databases from their inception to October 2021. The pooled odds ratio (ORs), hazard ratio (HRs), and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were calculated.
Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria and meta-analysis included 15 studies. The presence of DR reflects a higher risk of cognitive dysfunction (OR = 2.45; 95% CI: 1.76-3.41; HR = 1.34 95% CI: 1.10-1.62). Cohort study combined risk was 2.62 (95% CI: 1.93-3.56), in cross-sectional study was 2.07 (95% CI: 1.11-3.88). The pooled OR was 2.38 (95% CI: 1.83-3.10) and 3.11 (95% CI: 1.15-8.40) in Asia and Oceania. No such association was found in North America (OR = 2.22; 95% CI: 0.77-6.38). The pooled risk was 2.47 (95% CI: 1.76-3.48) in patients with T2DM, while did not identify an association between these two conditions in T1DM. The combined unadjusted and adjusted ORs were 2.72 (95% CI: 1.99-3.73) and 2.06 (95% CI: 1.49-2.85). DR severity and the risk of cognitive impairment showed a positive correlation and mainly impaired the speeds of psychomotor and information processing.
DR can help to identify people at high risk of cognitive dysfunction. Further studies are indispensable for exploring the relationship between DR and cognitive impairment in the patients for different age, gender and race, as well as to assess the risk of cognitive impairment in different populations.
本研究旨在确定糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)与认知功能障碍之间的关系,并探讨 DR 对不同认知领域的影响。
系统检索 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、万方数据、CBM、CNKI 和 VIP 数据库,从建库至 2021 年 10 月。计算合并的比值比(ORs)、风险比(HRs)和 95%置信区间(CIs)。
纳入 22 项研究,meta 分析共纳入 15 项研究。存在 DR 反映出更高的认知功能障碍风险(OR=2.45;95%CI:1.76-3.41;HR=1.34;95%CI:1.10-1.62)。队列研究合并风险为 2.62(95%CI:1.93-3.56),横断面研究为 2.07(95%CI:1.11-3.88)。亚洲和大洋洲的汇总 OR 为 2.38(95%CI:1.83-3.10)和 3.11(95%CI:1.15-8.40),北美则无相关性(OR=2.22;95%CI:0.77-6.38)。在 T2DM 患者中,汇总风险为 2.47(95%CI:1.76-3.48),但在 T1DM 患者中未发现两者之间存在关联。未调整和调整后的合并 OR 分别为 2.72(95%CI:1.99-3.73)和 2.06(95%CI:1.49-2.85)。DR 严重程度与认知障碍风险呈正相关,主要损害精神运动和信息处理速度。
DR 有助于识别认知功能障碍高危人群。进一步的研究对于探讨不同年龄、性别和种族的 DR 与认知障碍之间的关系以及评估不同人群的认知障碍风险是必不可少的。