Lu Yu-Jie, Lian Lian, Shen Xiao-Ming, Li Ying, Ji Sheng-Jun, Wang Wen-Jie, Yang Yi, Wang Ying, Duan Wei-Ming
Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Department of Oncology, Suzhou Xiangcheng People's Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Jan;10(1):174-183. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-2622.
This study aimed to identify potential stemness-related targets in gastric cancer (GC) in order to support the development of new treatment strategies and improve patient survival.
Using the edgeR package, we identified stemness-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using GSE112631 and the stemness-related signaling pathways in the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) database. Lasso-penalized Cox regression analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis tested by Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were used to screen out survival genes in order to construct a prognostic model. We verified the accuracy of our prognostic model using a nomogram and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Patients were divided into two groups based on the median risk score, and functional enrichment analysis was used to explore the differences between the two groups.
Eight genes were selected to establish a prognostic model of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and a validation model of the GSE84437 dataset from the Genome Expression Omnibus (GEO). In both models, we found that the low risk score group had better overall survival (OS) than the high-risk score group. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways between the two risk groups were totally different.
We used eight stemness-related genes to build a prognostic model. The high-risk score group had a worse prognosis compared to the low-risk score group.
本研究旨在确定胃癌(GC)中潜在的干性相关靶点,以支持新治疗策略的开发并提高患者生存率。
使用edgeR软件包,我们利用GSE112631鉴定干性相关差异表达基因(DEGs),并在基因集富集分析(GSEA)数据库中鉴定干性相关信号通路。采用套索惩罚Cox回归分析和基于赤池信息准则(AIC)检验的多变量Cox回归分析筛选生存基因,以构建预后模型。我们使用列线图和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析验证了预后模型的准确性。根据中位风险评分将患者分为两组,并使用功能富集分析探索两组之间的差异。
选择8个基因建立癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)的预后模型和来自基因表达综合数据库(GEO)的GSE84437数据集的验证模型。在两个模型中,我们发现低风险评分组的总生存期(OS)优于高风险评分组。两个风险组之间的京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)通路完全不同。
我们使用8个干性相关基因构建了一个预后模型。与低风险评分组相比,高风险评分组的预后更差。