• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗生素预防的持续时间。一项实验研究。

Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. An experimental study.

作者信息

Scher K S, Wroczynski A F, Jones C W

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1986 Feb;151(2):209-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90071-1.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9610(86)90071-1
PMID:3511759
Abstract

An animal wound model was used to evaluate single dose cefazolin, multiple dose cefazolin, and single dose cefonicid in the prevention of wound infection. Incisions made in Swiss-Webster mice were contaminated with either Staph. aureus (1.94 X 10(8) colony forming units) or E. coli (4.39 X 10(8) colony forming units). Five experimental groups were studied. Group I encompassed control animals given saline solution, Group II animals given 10 mg cefazolin preoperatively, Group III animals given 10 mg of cefazolin preoperatively and postoperatively, Group IV animals given 10 mg of cefonicid preoperatively, and Group V animals given 20 mg of cefonicid preoperatively. All medications were given by intraperitoneal injection. Antibiotics were given 1 hour before operation. Postoperative doses were given 4 hours after operation. Incisions were opened 48 hours after surgery and wound bacterial concentrations were determined. After both Staph. aureus and E. coli contamination, each of the four cephalosporin regimens significantly reduced the mean wound bacterial concentrations compared with that of the control animals (p less than 0.001). Each of the four cephalosporin regimens also significantly reduced the number of infected wounds compared with that of the control subjects (p less than 0.001). No significant differences were noted among the four antibiotic regimens with respect to mean wound bacterial concentration or infection rate. In the context of this model, a single dose of cefazolin seems to be equally effective as multiple doses of the drug for surgical prophylaxis. Extended half-life cephalosporins, like cefonicid, do not appear to be more effective than a single dose of cefazolin, which is a much less expensive antibiotic.

摘要

使用动物伤口模型评估单剂量头孢唑林、多剂量头孢唑林和单剂量头孢尼西预防伤口感染的效果。在瑞士 Webster 小鼠身上制造切口,并用金黄色葡萄球菌(1.94×10⁸ 菌落形成单位)或大肠杆菌(4.39×10⁸ 菌落形成单位)污染。研究了五个实验组。第一组包括给予生理盐水的对照动物,第二组动物术前给予 10mg 头孢唑林,第三组动物术前和术后均给予 10mg 头孢唑林,第四组动物术前给予 10mg 头孢尼西,第五组动物术前给予 20mg 头孢尼西。所有药物均通过腹腔注射给药。抗生素在手术前 1 小时给予。术后剂量在手术后 4 小时给予。术后 48 小时打开切口并测定伤口细菌浓度。在金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌污染后,与对照动物相比,四种头孢菌素方案中的每一种均显著降低了平均伤口细菌浓度(p<0.001)。与对照受试者相比,四种头孢菌素方案中的每一种也显著减少了感染伤口的数量(p<0.001)。在平均伤口细菌浓度或感染率方面,四种抗生素方案之间未观察到显著差异。在该模型中,单剂量头孢唑林似乎与多剂量该药物用于手术预防同样有效。半衰期延长的头孢菌素,如头孢尼西,似乎并不比单剂量头孢唑林更有效,而头孢唑林是一种价格便宜得多的抗生素。

相似文献

1
Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. An experimental study.抗生素预防的持续时间。一项实验研究。
Am J Surg. 1986 Feb;151(2):209-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90071-1.
2
Anaerobic coverage for wound prophylaxis. Comparison of cefazolin and cefoxitin.用于伤口预防的厌氧菌覆盖。头孢唑林与头孢西丁的比较。
Am J Surg. 1986 Feb;151(2):213-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90072-3.
3
Which cephalosporin for wound prophylaxis? An experimental comparison of three drugs.哪种头孢菌素用于伤口预防?三种药物的实验比较。
Surgery. 1985 Jul;98(1):30-4.
4
Studies on the duration of antibiotic administration for surgical prophylaxis.外科预防用抗生素给药持续时间的研究。
Am Surg. 1997 Jan;63(1):59-62.
5
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for arthroplasty: a comparative study of cefonicid and cefazolin.关节成形术的抗菌预防:头孢尼西与头孢唑林的对比研究。
Orthopedics. 1987 Oct;10(10):1405-9. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19871001-10.
6
A comparison of topical and systemic cefazolin for wound prophylaxis.局部应用与全身应用头孢唑林预防伤口感染的比较。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984 Feb;158(2):117-9.
7
Combined use of topical and systemic antibiotics.局部和全身抗生素联合使用。
Am J Surg. 1991 Apr;161(4):422-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)91103-p.
8
Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery. A prospective randomized trial comparing two day cefuroxime prophylaxis with four day cefazolin prophylaxis.心血管手术围手术期抗菌药物预防。一项前瞻性随机试验,比较头孢呋辛两日预防用药与头孢唑林四日预防用药。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1986 May-Jun;27(3):300-6.
9
["Single shot" prevention in abdominal surgery. Antibiotics with long half-life (ceftriaxone, ornidazole) vs. antibiotics with short half-life (cefazolin, metronidazole, clindamycin)].腹部手术中的“单次给药”预防。长半衰期抗生素(头孢曲松、奥硝唑)与短半衰期抗生素(头孢唑林、甲硝唑、克林霉素)的对比
Helv Chir Acta. 1994 Apr;60(4):483-8.
10
Failure of cephalosporins to prevent Staphylococcus aureus surgical wound infections.头孢菌素未能预防金黄色葡萄球菌手术伤口感染。
JAMA. 1990 Feb 16;263(7):961-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Flucloxacillin compared with cefazolin in short-term prophylaxis for clean orthopedic surgery.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;108(5):308-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00932321.
2
Postoperative infection prophylaxis for upper gastrointestinal tract surgery--a prospective and comparative randomized study of cefoxitin and ceftizoxime.上消化道手术术后感染的预防——头孢西丁和头孢唑肟的前瞻性对比随机研究
Jpn J Surg. 1989 May;19(3):255-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02471399.
3
[Duration of the preventive use of antibiotics in colorectal surgery--single administration versus short-term prevention].
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1989;374(5):272-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01261469.