Conklin John, Tabari Azadeh, Longo Maria Gabriela Figueiro, Cobos Camilo Jaimes, Setsompop Kawin, Cauley Stephen F, Kirsch John E, Huang Susie Yi, Rapalino Otto, Gee Michael S, Caruso Paul J
Divisions of Emergency Imaging and Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Pediatr Radiol. 2022 May;52(6):1115-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05273-8. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is highly sensitive for intracranial hemorrhagic and mineralized lesions but is associated with long scan times. Wave controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (Wave-CAIPI) enables greater acceleration factors and might facilitate broader application of SWI, especially in motion-prone populations.
To compare highly accelerated Wave-CAIPI SWI to standard SWI in the non-sedated pediatric outpatient setting, with respect to the following variables: estimated scan time, image noise, artifacts, visualization of normal anatomy and visualization of pathology.
Twenty-eight children (11 girls, 17 boys; mean age ± standard deviation [SD] = 128.3±62 months) underwent 3-tesla (T) brain MRI, including standard three-dimensional (3-D) SWI sequence followed by a highly accelerated Wave-CAIPI SWI sequence for each subject. We rated all studies using a predefined 5-point scale and used the Wilcoxon signed rank test to assess the difference for each variable between sequences.
Wave-CAIPI SWI provided a 78% and 67% reduction in estimated scan time using the 32- and 20-channel coils, respectively, corresponding to estimated scan time reductions of 3.5 min and 3 min, respectively. All 28 children were imaged without anesthesia. Inter-reader agreement ranged from fair to substantial (k=0.67 for evaluation of pathology, 0.55 for anatomical contrast, 0.3 for central noise, and 0.71 for artifacts). Image noise was rated higher in the central brain with wave SWI (P<0.01), but not in the peripheral brain. There was no significant difference in the visualization of normal anatomical structures and visualization of pathology between the standard and wave SWI sequences (P=0.77 and P=0.79, respectively).
Highly accelerated Wave-CAIPI SWI of the brain can provide similar image quality to standard SWI, with estimated scan time reduction of 3-3.5 min depending on the radiofrequency coil used, with fewer motion artifacts, at a cost of mild but perceptibly increased noise in the central brain.
susceptibility加权成像(SWI)对颅内出血性和矿化性病变高度敏感,但扫描时间较长。并行成像中的波控混叠(Wave-CAIPI)能够实现更高的加速因子,可能有助于SWI更广泛的应用,尤其是在易动人群中。
在非镇静儿科门诊环境中,比较高度加速的Wave-CAIPI SWI与标准SWI在以下变量方面的差异:估计扫描时间、图像噪声、伪影、正常解剖结构的可视化和病变的可视化。
28名儿童(11名女孩,17名男孩;平均年龄±标准差[SD]=128.3±62个月)接受了3特斯拉(T)脑MRI检查,包括标准三维(3-D)SWI序列,随后为每个受试者进行高度加速的Wave-CAIPI SWI序列。我们使用预定义的5分制对所有研究进行评分,并使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估序列之间每个变量的差异。
Wave-CAIPI SWI分别使用32通道和20通道线圈时,估计扫描时间减少了78%和67%,分别对应于估计扫描时间减少3.5分钟和3分钟。所有28名儿童均在未麻醉的情况下成像。阅片者间一致性从中等到高度一致(评估病变为k=0.67,解剖对比度为k=0.55,中心噪声为k=0.3,伪影为k=0.71)。Wave SWI时,脑中部的图像噪声评分较高(P<0.01),但脑外周无显著差异。标准SWI序列和Wave SWI序列在正常解剖结构的可视化和病变的可视化方面无显著差异(分别为P=0.77和P=0.79)。
高度加速的脑Wave-CAIPI SWI可以提供与标准SWI相似的图像质量,根据使用的射频线圈不同,估计扫描时间减少3-3.5分钟,运动伪影较少,代价是脑中部噪声轻度但明显增加。