• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用人工智能选择的指标评估模拟神经外科任务中的学习曲线。

Assessment of learning curves on a simulated neurosurgical task using metrics selected by artificial intelligence.

作者信息

Ledwos Nicole, Mirchi Nykan, Yilmaz Recai, Winkler-Schwartz Alexander, Sawni Anika, Fazlollahi Ali M, Bissonnette Vincent, Bajunaid Khalid, Sabbagh Abdulrahman J, Del Maestro Rolando F

机构信息

1Neurosurgical Simulation and Artificial Intelligence Learning Centre, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University.

3Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2022 Feb 4;137(4):1160-1171. doi: 10.3171/2021.12.JNS211563. Print 2022 Oct 1.

DOI:10.3171/2021.12.JNS211563
PMID:35120309
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Understanding the variation of learning curves of experts and trainees for a given surgical procedure is important in implementing formative learning paradigms to accelerate mastery. The study objectives were to use artificial intelligence (AI)-derived metrics to determine the learning curves of participants in 4 groups with different expertise levels who performed a series of identical virtual reality (VR) subpial resection tasks and to identify learning curve differences among the 4 groups.

METHODS

A total of 50 individuals participated, 14 neurosurgeons, 4 neurosurgical fellows and 10 senior residents (seniors), 10 junior residents (juniors), and 12 medical students. All participants performed 5 repetitions of a subpial tumor resection on the NeuroVR (CAE Healthcare) platform, and 6 a priori-derived metrics selected using the K-nearest neighbors machine learning algorithm were used to assess participant learning curves. Group learning curves were plotted over the 5 trials for each metric. A mixed, repeated-measures ANOVA was performed between the first and fifth trial. For significant interactions (p < 0.05), post hoc Tukey's HSD analysis was conducted to determine the location of the significance.

RESULTS

Overall, 5 of the 6 metrics assessed had a significant interaction (p < 0.05). The 4 groups, neurosurgeons, seniors, juniors, and medical students, showed an improvement between the first and fifth trial on at least one of the 6 metrics evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Learning curves generated using AI-derived metrics provided novel insights into technical skill acquisition, based on expertise level, during repeated VR-simulated subpial tumor resections, which will allow educators to develop more focused formative educational paradigms for neurosurgical trainees.

摘要

目的

了解特定外科手术中专家和实习生学习曲线的变化,对于实施形成性学习模式以加速掌握技能至关重要。本研究的目的是使用人工智能(AI)得出的指标来确定4组不同专业水平的参与者在执行一系列相同的虚拟现实(VR)软膜下切除术任务时的学习曲线,并识别这4组之间的学习曲线差异。

方法

共有50人参与,其中14名神经外科医生、4名神经外科住院医师、10名高年资住院医师(高年资组)、10名低年资住院医师(低年资组)和12名医学生。所有参与者在NeuroVR(CAE Healthcare)平台上对软膜下肿瘤切除术进行5次重复操作,并使用通过K近邻机器学习算法选择的6个先验得出的指标来评估参与者的学习曲线。针对每个指标,在5次试验中绘制各组的学习曲线。在第一次和第五次试验之间进行混合重复测量方差分析。对于有显著交互作用(p<0.05)的情况,进行事后Tukey's HSD分析以确定显著性位置。

结果

总体而言,评估的6个指标中有5个具有显著交互作用(p<0.05)。神经外科医生、高年资组、低年资组和医学生这4组在评估的6个指标中至少有一个在第一次和第五次试验之间表现出改善。

结论

在重复的VR模拟软膜下肿瘤切除术中,使用AI得出的指标生成的学习曲线基于专业水平为技术技能的获取提供了新的见解,这将使教育工作者能够为神经外科实习生开发更有针对性的形成性教育模式。

相似文献

1
Assessment of learning curves on a simulated neurosurgical task using metrics selected by artificial intelligence.使用人工智能选择的指标评估模拟神经外科任务中的学习曲线。
J Neurosurg. 2022 Feb 4;137(4):1160-1171. doi: 10.3171/2021.12.JNS211563. Print 2022 Oct 1.
2
Machine Learning Identification of Surgical and Operative Factors Associated With Surgical Expertise in Virtual Reality Simulation.机器学习识别与虚拟现实模拟手术专长相关的手术和操作因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198363. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8363.
3
Proficiency performance benchmarks for removal of simulated brain tumors using a virtual reality simulator NeuroTouch.使用虚拟现实模拟器NeuroTouch切除模拟脑肿瘤的熟练操作基准。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Jul-Aug;72(4):685-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.12.014. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
4
Utilizing artificial intelligence and electroencephalography to assess expertise on a simulated neurosurgical task.利用人工智能和脑电图评估在模拟神经外科手术任务中的专业技能。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 Jan;152:106286. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106286. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
5
The Virtual Operative Assistant: An explainable artificial intelligence tool for simulation-based training in surgery and medicine.虚拟手术助手:一种用于手术和医学模拟培训的可解释人工智能工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 27;15(2):e0229596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229596. eCollection 2020.
6
Machine learning distinguishes neurosurgical skill levels in a virtual reality tumor resection task.机器学习在虚拟现实肿瘤切除任务中区分神经外科手术技能水平。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2020 Jun;58(6):1357-1367. doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02155-3. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
7
Development of a performance model for virtual reality tumor resections.虚拟现实肿瘤切除术性能模型的开发。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul 1;131(1):192-200. doi: 10.3171/2018.2.JNS172327. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
8
Utilizing a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network to assess a virtual reality surgical procedure.利用多层感知器人工神经网络评估虚拟现实手术。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Sep;136:104770. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104770. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
9
Artificial Intelligence Distinguishes Surgical Training Levels in a Virtual Reality Spinal Task.人工智能可区分虚拟现实脊柱任务中的手术训练水平。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Dec 4;101(23):e127. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01197.
10
Tremor Assessment during Virtual Reality Brain Tumor Resection.虚拟现实脑肿瘤切除术中的震颤评估
J Surg Educ. 2020 May-Jun;77(3):643-651. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.11.011. Epub 2019 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Human Instruction and Surgical Simulation Performance: A Randomized Clinical Trial.人工智能辅助的人工指导与手术模拟表现:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.2564.
2
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: a Scoping Review of the Evidence for Efficacy and Future Directions.医学教育中的人工智能:疗效证据及未来方向的范围综述
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Apr 2;35(3):1803-1816. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02373-0. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Neuroendoscopy Training.神经内镜培训
Asian J Neurosurg. 2024 Oct 10;20(1):1-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791713. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
The impact of surgical simulation and training technologies on general surgery education.手术模拟和培训技术对普通外科学教育的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):1297. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06299-w.
5
Real-Time multifaceted artificial intelligence vs In-Person instruction in teaching surgical technical skills: a randomized controlled trial.实时多方面人工智能与面对面教学在外科技术技能教学中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 2;14(1):15130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65716-8.
6
Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare Simulation: The Shifting Landscape of Medical Education.人工智能与医疗模拟:医学教育的变革格局
Cureus. 2024 May 6;16(5):e59747. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59747. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Advances in Pediatric Surgery Simulation-Based Training.基于模拟训练的小儿外科进展
Children (Basel). 2023 Dec 28;11(1):34. doi: 10.3390/children11010034.
8
The implementation of simulators in neurosurgery training. The application of the simulator program in Peru.神经外科培训中模拟器的应用。模拟器程序在秘鲁的应用。
Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Oct 6;14:356. doi: 10.25259/SNI_755_2023. eCollection 2023.
9
Extended Reality in Neurosurgical Education: A Systematic Review.扩展现实在神经外科学教育中的应用:系统评价。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 14;22(16):6067. doi: 10.3390/s22166067.