School of Governance, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center, UMC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 4;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07357-5.
Healthcare organisations face major challenges to keep healthcare accessible and affordable. This requires them to transform and improve their performance. To do so, organisations must influence employee job performance. Therefore, it is necessary to know what the key dimensions of job performance in healthcare are and how these dimensions can be improved. This study has three aims. The first aim is to determine what key dimensions of job performance are discussed in the healthcare literature. The second aim is to determine to which professionals and healthcare organisations these dimensions of job performance pertain. The third aim is to identify factors that organisations can use to affect the dimensions of job performance in healthcare.
A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The authors searched Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Books, which resulted in the identification of 763 records. After screening 92 articles were included.
The dimensions - task, contextual, and adaptative performance and counterproductive work behaviour - are reflected in the literature on job performance in healthcare. Adaptive performance and counterproductive work behaviour appear to be under-researched. The studies were conducted in different healthcare organisations and pertain to a variety of healthcare professionals. Organisations can affect job performance on the macro-, meso-, and micro-level to achieve transformation and improvement.
Based on more than 90 studies published in over 70 journals, the authors conclude that job performance in healthcare can be conceptualised into four dimensions: task, contextual and adaptive performance, and counterproductive work behaviour. Generally, these dimensions correspond with the dimensions discussed in the job performance literature. This implies that these dimensions can be used for further research into job performance in healthcare. Many healthcare studies on job performance focus on two dimensions: task and contextual performance. However, adaptive performance, which is of great importance in constantly changing environments, is under-researched and should be examined further in future research. This also applies to counterproductive work behaviour. To improve job performance, interventions are required on the macro-, meso-, and micro-levels, which relate to governance, leadership, and individual skills and characteristics.
医疗机构在保持医疗服务的可及性和可负担性方面面临着重大挑战。这要求他们进行转型和改进绩效。为此,组织必须影响员工的工作绩效。因此,有必要了解医疗保健工作绩效的关键维度是什么,以及如何提高这些维度。本研究有三个目的。第一个目的是确定医疗保健文献中讨论了哪些关键的工作绩效维度。第二个目的是确定这些工作绩效维度属于哪些专业人员和医疗机构。第三个目的是确定组织可以用来影响医疗保健工作绩效维度的因素。
使用系统综述首选报告项目和荟萃分析(PRISMA)声明进行了系统综述。作者在 Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed 和 Google Books 上进行了搜索,共确定了 763 条记录。经过筛选,有 92 篇文章被纳入。
任务、背景和适应性绩效以及反生产工作行为这几个维度在医疗保健工作绩效文献中得到了体现。适应性绩效和反生产工作行为似乎研究不足。这些研究是在不同的医疗机构中进行的,涉及到各种医疗保健专业人员。组织可以在宏观、中观和微观层面上影响工作绩效,以实现转型和改进。
基于 70 多种期刊上发表的 90 多项研究,作者得出结论,医疗保健工作绩效可以被概念化为四个维度:任务、背景和适应性绩效,以及反生产工作行为。一般来说,这些维度与工作绩效文献中讨论的维度相对应。这意味着这些维度可以用于进一步研究医疗保健工作绩效。许多关于医疗保健工作绩效的研究都集中在两个维度上:任务和背景绩效。然而,在不断变化的环境中非常重要的适应性绩效研究不足,应该在未来的研究中进一步研究。反生产工作行为也是如此。为了提高工作绩效,需要在宏观、中观和微观层面上进行干预,这些干预与治理、领导力以及个人技能和特征有关。