. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton (ON) Canada.
. Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Bras Pneumol. 2023 Aug 7;49(4):e20230167. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20230167. eCollection 2023.
Optimal clinical decision-making requires understanding of evidence regarding benefits, harms, and burdens of alternative management options. Rigorously conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses offer accurate summaries of the evidence. However, such summaries may review only low-certainty evidence, in the process highlighting that no single decision is likely to be best for all patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach offers a systematic and transparent method for rating certainty of evidence in systematic reviews. In this paper, we will address the importance of assessing the certainty associated with bodies of evidence; explain how the GRADE system rates the certainty of evidence from systematic reviews; and present the GRADE evidence to decision framework for moving from evidence to strong or weak recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.
最佳临床决策需要了解替代管理方案的益处、危害和负担方面的证据。经过严格执行的系统评价和荟萃分析可以准确地总结证据。然而,此类总结可能只审查低确定性证据,在此过程中强调,没有任何单一决策可能对所有患者都是最佳的。推荐评估、制定与评估(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation,GRADE)方法为系统评价中证据确定性的评估提供了一种系统且透明的方法。在本文中,我们将讨论评估证据体相关确定性的重要性;解释 GRADE 系统如何对系统评价中证据的确定性进行评级;并介绍 GRADE 证据决策框架,以便在临床实践指南中从证据得出强弱推荐。