Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing, 211100, China.
Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 15;308:114570. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114570. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
With the increasing carbon neutral targets claimed by responsible countries, many research has been done to investigate the impact of environmental regulation on green technology innovation (GTI). However, there still remains a gap at micro level that takes enterprise as research subject to figure out an effective regulatory mechanism that supports the development of GTI. Since the integration of technology and finance is the main trend in future progress of GTI, it is meaningful to study the decision-making behavior and influencing factors of heterogenous enterprises and banks under market-based environmental regulation policies. This paper established a tripartite evolutionary game model among two types of enterprises with distinct Research & Development (R&D) ability and banks. The results show that: (1) the scenario when subsidy to enterprises is greater than to banks leads to a better situation; (2) penalty has more significant influence on enterprises than subsidies at the early stage, and enterprises' strategic choices of independent R&D is more reliable on subsidies; (3) when the price gap between different levels of technology increases, enterprises are inclined to continuously invest in green R&D, while it will restrain enterprises' technology introduction behavior.
随着负责任国家提出越来越多的碳中和目标,许多研究已经在调查环境法规对绿色技术创新(GTI)的影响。然而,在微观层面上仍存在一个空白,即需要以企业为研究对象,找出支持 GTI 发展的有效监管机制。由于技术和金融的融合是未来 GTI 发展的主要趋势,因此研究市场为基础的环境监管政策下异质企业和银行的决策行为及其影响因素具有重要意义。本文在具有不同研发(R&D)能力的两类企业和银行之间建立了三方演化博弈模型。结果表明:(1)企业补贴大于银行补贴的情景会导致更好的局面;(2)在早期阶段,罚款对企业的影响比补贴更为显著,而企业的独立研发战略选择对补贴更为可靠;(3)当不同层次技术之间的价格差距增大时,企业更倾向于持续投资绿色研发,而这将抑制企业的技术引进行为。