Baumann Philipp, Gotta Verena, Adzikah Stephanie, Bernet Vera
Department of Intensive Care and Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Children's Research Centre, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Neonatology. 2022;119(2):230-237. doi: 10.1159/000521809. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
Transcutaneous PCO2 and PO2 measurement systems offer non-invasive blood gas trend monitoring. The aim of this prospective study was to assess bias and precision of a transcutaneous PCO2 and PO2 measurement system incorporating a novel pO2 sensor (Sentec OxiVenT™) in neonates ≥34 weeks of gestational age (GA) admitted to intensive care.
Transcutaneous PCO2 and PO2 were compared to arterial and capillary blood gas measurements. Bias and precision were calculated by fitting linear mixed models to account for repeated measurements, and influence of clinical covariates on bias and precision was assessed.
We obtained 611 paired transcutaneous and blood gas measurements in 110 patients (median GA 38.3 [interquartile range 36.1-39.7] weeks; age 9 [4-15] days; weight 3,000 [2,500-3,500] g). Transcutaneous PCO2 showed significant bias to arterial PCO2 (+0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.46, 0.76 kPa), but not to capillary PCO2 (-0.23; -0.46, 0.002 kPa). Bias of transcutaneous PO2 was significant to arterial PO2 (-2.50; -2.94, -2.06 kPa), while no significant bias compared to capillary PO2 was observed (+0.17; -0.30, 0.64 kPa). Precision intervals were ±1.8/2.0 kPa for arterial versus capillary PCO2 and ±4.9/3.3 kPa for arterial versus capillary PO2 comparisons, respectively. Further, sensor operating temperature (43°C vs. 42°C), soft tissue oedema, vasoactive drugs, weight, and GA significantly altered bias (p < 0.05).
The tested transcutaneous blood gas measurement system showed no significant bias compared to capillary PCO2 and PO2, acceptable bias to arterial PCO2, and limited agreement with arterial PO2. Precision intervals were wide for all comparisons.
经皮二氧化碳分压(PCO₂)和氧分压(PO₂)测量系统可提供无创血气趋势监测。本前瞻性研究的目的是评估一种包含新型PO₂传感器(Sentec OxiVenT™)的经皮PCO₂和PO₂测量系统在入住重症监护病房的胎龄≥34周新生儿中的偏差和精密度。
将经皮PCO₂和PO₂与动脉血和毛细血管血气测量结果进行比较。通过拟合线性混合模型计算偏差和精密度,以考虑重复测量,并评估临床协变量对偏差和精密度的影响。
我们在110例患者中获得了611对经皮和血气测量值(胎龄中位数38.3[四分位间距36.1 - 39.7]周;年龄9[4 - 15]天;体重3000[2500 - 3500]g)。经皮PCO₂与动脉PCO₂相比存在显著偏差(+0.61;95%置信区间0.46,0.76 kPa),但与毛细血管PCO₂相比无显著偏差(-0.23;-0.46,0.002 kPa)。经皮PO₂与动脉PO₂相比偏差显著(-2.50;-2.94,-2.06 kPa),而与毛细血管PO₂相比未观察到显著偏差(+0.17;-0.30,0.64 kPa)。动脉与毛细血管PCO₂比较的精密度区间分别为±1.8/2.0 kPa,动脉与毛细血管PO₂比较的精密度区间分别为±4.9/3.3 kPa。此外,传感器工作温度(43°C对42°C)、软组织水肿、血管活性药物、体重和胎龄显著改变偏差(p < 0.05)。
与毛细血管PCO₂和PO₂相比,所测试的经皮血气测量系统无显著偏差,与动脉PCO₂的偏差可接受,与动脉PO₂的一致性有限。所有比较的精密度区间都较宽。