Shapiro B A, Mahutte C K, Cane R D, Gilmour I J
Department of Anesthesia, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Crit Care Med. 1993 Apr;21(4):487-94. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199304000-00005.
To prospectively assess the clinical performance of a fluorescent optode-based blood gas monitoring system that is designed to perform arterial pH, PCO2, and PO2 measurements as frequently as clinically required without violating the integrity of the arterial catheter tubing system or permanently removing blood from the patient.
A prospective, multicenter study to compare modern blood gas analyzer measurements with the coinciding measurements of the blood gas monitoring system.
Four intensive care units (ICUs) in academic centers with varying patient populations, blood gas measurement routines, and blood gas laboratory facilities.
Adult ICU patients (n = 117), with appropriately functioning radial arterial catheters in place, who were assessed as likely to require multiple arterial blood gas measurements for > or = 2 days.
None.
A total of 117 patients had 1,341 concurrent blood gas analyzer and monitor measurements of arterial pH, PCO2, and PO2 over a 1- to 4-day period. The range of values were 7.14 to 7.64 for arterial pH, 19 to 98 torr (2.5 to 13.0 kPa) for PaCO2, and 38 to 413 torr (5.1 to 54.9 kPa) for PaO2. Linear regression analysis of the optode-based monitor compared with the electrode-based blood gas analyzer demonstrated r2 values of .85 for pH, .92 for PCO2, and .94 for PO2. Comparative statistical analyses for bias (mean difference between analyzer and monitor) and precision (standard deviation of the mean difference [+/- SD] between analyzer and monitor) were respectively:-0.004 and +/- 0.027 for pH; -0.8 torr (-0.11 kPa) and +/- 2.4 torr (0.32 kPa) for PCO2; -2.2 torr (-0.31 kPa) and +/- 8.7 torr (1.2 kPa) for PO2.
Clinical performance of this fluorescent, optode-based blood gas monitoring system demonstrates stability, consistency, and accuracy comparable to modern blood gas analyzers. This system withstood the normal abuse and rigors of clinical conditions common to the ICU while reliably performing in critically ill patients for up to 80 hrs. Use of the device did not significantly alter the function or longevity normally expected from a 20-gauge radial artery catheter. We submit that this blood gas monitoring system can replace the use of blood gas analyzers for ICU patients with indwelling arterial catheters.
前瞻性评估一种基于荧光光极的血气监测系统的临床性能,该系统旨在根据临床需要尽可能频繁地进行动脉血pH值、PCO₂和PO₂测量,同时不破坏动脉导管管路系统的完整性,也无需从患者体内永久性采血。
一项前瞻性多中心研究,比较现代血气分析仪的测量结果与血气监测系统的同步测量结果。
学术中心的四个重症监护病房(ICU),患者群体、血气测量常规及血气实验室设施各不相同。
成年ICU患者(n = 117),已置入功能正常的桡动脉导管,预计可能需要进行≥2天的多次动脉血气测量。
无。
在1至4天的时间内,共117例患者进行了1341次动脉血pH值、PCO₂和PO₂的血气分析仪与监测仪同步测量。动脉血pH值范围为7.14至7.64,PaCO₂为19至98托(2.5至13.0千帕),PaO₂为38至413托(5.1至54.9千帕)。基于光极的监测仪与基于电极的血气分析仪的线性回归分析显示,pH值的r²为0.85,PCO₂为0.92,PO₂为0.94。对偏差(分析仪与监测仪之间的平均差异)和精密度(分析仪与监测仪之间平均差异的标准差[±SD])的比较统计分析结果分别为:pH值为-0.004和±0.027;PCO₂为-0.8托(-0.11千帕)和±2.4托(0.32千帕);PO₂为-2.2托(-0.31千帕)和±8.7托(-1.2千帕)。
这种基于荧光光极的血气监测系统的临床性能显示出与现代血气分析仪相当的稳定性、一致性和准确性。该系统经受住了ICU常见临床状况的正常损耗和严苛考验,在危重症患者中可靠运行长达80小时。使用该设备并未显著改变20号桡动脉导管通常预期的功能或使用寿命。我们认为,这种血气监测系统可替代为留置动脉导管的ICU患者使用血气分析仪。