Suppr超能文献

I 型工业头盔防坠落性能评估。

Evaluation of the Fall Protection of Type I Industrial Helmets.

机构信息

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA.

出版信息

Ann Biomed Eng. 2022 Nov;50(11):1565-1578. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-02922-3. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

Abstract

The performance of Type I industrial helmets for fall protection is not required to be tested in standardized tests. The current study analyzed the fall protection performance of Type I industrial helmets and evaluated if the use of a chin strap and the suspension system tightness have any effect on protection performance. Head impact tests were performed using an instrumented manikin. There were 12 combinations of test conditions: with or without chin strap usage, three levels of suspension system tightness, and two impact surfaces. Four representative helmet models (two basic and two advanced models) were selected for the study. Impact tests without a helmet under all other applicable test conditions were used as a control group. There were four replicates for each test condition-a total of 192 impact tests with helmets and eight impact tests for the control group. The peak acceleration and the calculated head impact criteria (HIC) were used to evaluate shock absorption performance of the helmets. The results showed that all four helmet models demonstrated excellent performance for fall protection compared to the barehead control group. The fall protection performance of the advanced helmet models was substantially better than the basic helmet models. However, the effects of the use of chin straps and suspension system tightness on the helmets' fall protection performance were statistically not significant.

摘要

I 类工业安全帽的防坠落性能无需在标准化测试中进行测试。本研究分析了 I 类工业安全帽的防坠落性能,并评估了使用下巴带和悬挂系统的紧固程度是否对保护性能有任何影响。使用仪器化人体模型进行了头部冲击测试。测试条件有 12 种组合:使用或不使用下巴带、悬挂系统紧固程度的三个级别,以及两种冲击表面。选择了四个有代表性的头盔模型(两个基本模型和两个先进模型)进行研究。在所有其他适用测试条件下没有头盔的冲击测试被用作对照组。每种测试条件有四个重复——总共进行了 192 次带头盔的冲击测试和 8 次对照组的冲击测试。峰值加速度和计算的头部冲击标准(HIC)用于评估头盔的减震性能。结果表明,与裸头对照组相比,所有四种头盔模型都表现出出色的防坠落性能。先进头盔模型的防坠落性能明显优于基本头盔模型。然而,下巴带的使用和悬挂系统的紧固程度对头盔防坠落性能的影响在统计学上并不显著。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c04/9885975/c19e93e9c634/nihms-1858485-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Fall Protection of Type I Industrial Helmets.I 型工业头盔防坠落性能评估。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2022 Nov;50(11):1565-1578. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-02922-3. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
4

本文引用的文献

7
Bandwidth and sample rate requirements for wearable head impact sensors.可穿戴式头部撞击传感器的带宽和采样率要求。
J Biomech. 2016 Sep 6;49(13):2918-2924. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验