Suppr超能文献

理解来源监测亚型及其与精神病的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Understanding source monitoring subtypes and their relation to psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 May;76(5):162-171. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13338. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

Abstract

AIMS

Source monitoring (SM) is the metacognitive ability to determine the origin of one's experiences. SM is altered in primary psychiatric psychosis, although relationships between SM subtypes, other cognitive domains and symptoms are unclear. Our aims were to synthesize evidence comparing psychosis -with and without hallucinations- and healthy controls classifying SM subtypes by source discrimination (internal/external/reality monitoring) and stimulus modality (visual/auditory/imagined/performed).

METHODS

This systematic review adopted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes guidelines. Core demographical and clinical parameters were extracted. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used as quality check. SM differences between (i) psychosis patients versus healthy controls and (ii) patients with versus without hallucinations were investigated via random-effect model meta-analysis. The primary effect size measure was standardized mean difference (SMD) in each SM subtype performance (error or accuracy). Heterogeneity, publication biases and meta-regressions were assessed.

RESULTS

Five thousand two hundred and fifty-six records were screened to finally include 44 studies (1566 patients, 1175 controls). Mean Newcastle-Ottawa score was 7.41 out of 9. Few studies measured SM associations with cognition (n = 9) and symptoms (n = 19), with heterogeneous findings. SM performance across all measures was reduced in psychosis versus healthy controls (SMD = 0.458). Internal SM (SMD: errors = 0.513; accuracy = 0.733) and imagined stimuli (SMD: errors = 0.688; accuracy = 0.978) were specifically impaired. Patients with versus without hallucinations showed SM deficits only for externalizing (SMD = 0.410) and imagined/auditory (SMD = 0.498/0.277) errors.

CONCLUSION

The proposed classifications highlight specific SM deficits for internal/imagined stimuli in psychosis, providing evidence-based indications to design and interpret future studies.

摘要

目的

来源监测(SM)是一种元认知能力,用于确定个体经验的来源。SM 在原发性精神精神病中发生改变,尽管 SM 亚型与其他认知领域和症状之间的关系尚不清楚。我们的目的是综合比较精神病(有和无幻觉)和健康对照组通过来源辨别(内部/外部/现实监测)和刺激方式(视觉/听觉/想象/执行)对 SM 亚型进行分类的证据。

方法

本系统评价采用了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目、观察性研究的荟萃分析流行病学和人群、干预、比较和结果指南。提取了核心人口统计学和临床参数。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表被用作质量检查。通过随机效应模型荟萃分析研究了(i)精神病患者与健康对照组之间和(ii)有幻觉与无幻觉患者之间的 SM 差异。主要的效应量测量是每种 SM 亚型表现(错误或准确性)的标准化均数差(SMD)。评估了异质性、发表偏倚和荟萃回归。

结果

筛选了 5256 条记录,最终纳入了 44 项研究(1566 名患者,1175 名对照)。平均纽卡斯尔-渥太华评分得分为 9 分中的 7.41 分。很少有研究测量 SM 与认知(n=9)和症状(n=19)的关联,结果存在异质性。与健康对照组相比,精神病人的 SM 表现(SMD=0.458)均降低。内部 SM(SMD:错误=0.513;准确性=0.733)和想象刺激(SMD:错误=0.688;准确性=0.978)特别受损。只有对于外化(SMD=0.410)和想象/听觉(SMD=0.498/0.277)错误,有幻觉与无幻觉的患者表现出 SM 缺陷。

结论

提出的分类法突出了精神病中内部/想象刺激的特定 SM 缺陷,为设计和解释未来的研究提供了循证依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b912/9313862/d1f4192fb9cf/PCN-76-162-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验