College of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Institute of Policy Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 21;9:762591. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.762591. eCollection 2021.
When examining research articles on the aging strategies, four ideals (i.e., successful aging, healthy aging, productive aging and active aging) could be explored by conducting bibliometric analyses. For the literature analysis, general information on the four aging ideals was understood through visualization analysis; the intellectual base and research hotspots were intuitively observed. CiteSpace was used as the method to conduct the co-occurrence analysis of keywords in order to obtain research trends and cutting-edge knowledge in the field of aging-related policies. Subsequently, the study revealed the nature of the link between these four aging ideals and disclosed the connection between their fundamental principles. The study ultimately enhanced the understanding of the diverse contexts that have impacted the way in which these ideals influence policy, which has caused dissimilar strategies for policy development. The study also extended the discussion of the definitions of and relationships between these four ideals with the goal of identifying new directions for aging-related practice and providing innovative insights and references for investigators.
当对衰老策略的研究文章进行考察时,可以通过文献计量分析来探索四个理想(即成功老龄化、健康老龄化、积极老龄化和生产性老龄化)。在文献分析中,通过可视化分析了解了这四个老龄化理想的一般信息,直观地观察了知识基础和研究热点。使用 CiteSpace 对关键词进行共现分析,以获取老龄化相关政策领域的研究趋势和前沿知识。随后,本研究揭示了这四个老龄化理想之间的联系本质,并揭示了它们基本原则之间的联系。本研究最终增强了对影响这些理想影响政策的多种背景的理解,导致了不同的政策发展策略。本研究还扩展了对这四个理想的定义和关系的讨论,旨在为老龄化相关实践确定新的方向,并为研究人员提供创新的见解和参考。
Front Public Health. 2021
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021-8
Int J Older People Nurs. 2021-1
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-7-28
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021-11-23
Gerontologist. 2020-4-2
Scientometrics. 2015
Ageing Soc. 2013-8
J Health Psychol. 2011-1-11