• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因组功能筛选数据的临床验证:未选择人群队列中观察到的变异分析。

Clinical validation of genomic functional screen data: Analysis of observed variants in an unselected population cohort.

作者信息

Schiabor Barrett Kelly M, Masnick Max, Hatchell Kathryn E, Savatt Juliann M, Banet Natalie, Buchanan Adam, Willard Huntington F

机构信息

Geisinger Research, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, USA.

Helix OpCo, San Mateo, CA, USA.

出版信息

HGG Adv. 2022 Jan 8;3(2):100086. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100086. eCollection 2022 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100086
PMID:35128484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8804171/
Abstract

Functional assessment of genomic variants provides a promising approach to systematically examine the potential pathogenicity of variants independent of associated clinical data. However, making such conclusions requires validation with appropriate clinical findings. To this end, here, we use variant calls from exome data and -related cancer diagnoses from electronic health records to demonstrate an association between published laboratory-based functional designations of variants and -related cancer diagnoses in an unselected cohort of patient-participants. These findings validate and support further exploration of functional assay data to better understand the pathogenicity of rare variants. This information may be valuable in the context of healthy population genomic screening, where many rare, potentially pathogenic variants may not have sufficient associated clinical data to inform their interpretation directly.

摘要

基因组变异的功能评估为系统地检查变异的潜在致病性提供了一种很有前景的方法,且无需相关临床数据。然而,要得出这样的结论需要通过适当的临床发现进行验证。为此,我们利用外显子组数据中的变异调用以及电子健康记录中的相关癌症诊断,在一个未经过筛选的患者参与者队列中,证明已发表的基于实验室的变异功能分类与相关癌症诊断之间的关联。这些发现验证并支持进一步探索功能检测数据,以更好地理解罕见变异的致病性。在健康人群基因组筛查的背景下,这些信息可能很有价值,因为许多罕见的、潜在致病性的变异可能没有足够的相关临床数据来直接指导对它们的解读。

相似文献

1
Clinical validation of genomic functional screen data: Analysis of observed variants in an unselected population cohort.基因组功能筛选数据的临床验证:未选择人群队列中观察到的变异分析。
HGG Adv. 2022 Jan 8;3(2):100086. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100086. eCollection 2022 Apr 14.
2
Comprehensive mutation detection of BRCA1/2 genes reveals large genomic rearrangements contribute to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Chinese women.全面检测 BRCA1/2 基因突变揭示大片段基因重排与中国遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌相关。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5765-3.
3
Globally Rare Variants With Founder Haplotypes in the South African Population: Implications for Point-of-Care Testing Based on a Single-Institution Next-Generation Sequencing Study.南非人群中具有奠基者单倍型的全球罕见变异:基于单机构下一代测序研究对即时检验的意义
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 12;10:619469. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.619469. eCollection 2020.
4
Characterization of Synonymous :c.132C>T as a Pathogenic Variant.同义突变:c.132C>T作为致病变异的特征分析。
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 11;11:812656. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.812656. eCollection 2021.
5
Comprehensive profiling of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in breast and ovarian cancer in Chinese patients.中国患者乳腺癌和卵巢癌中 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异的全面分析。
Hum Mutat. 2020 Mar;41(3):696-708. doi: 10.1002/humu.23965. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
6
Prevalence of germline pathogenic variants in sequential epithelial ovarian cancer cases.连续上皮性卵巢癌病例中种系致病性变异的流行率。
J Med Genet. 2019 May;56(5):301-307. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105792. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
7
Germline Missense Variants in : New Trends and Challenges for Clinical Annotation.中的种系错义变体:临床注释的新趋势与挑战
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Apr 12;11(4):522. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040522.
8
Design and validation of a next generation sequencing assay for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing.用于遗传性BRCA1和BRCA2突变检测的新一代测序检测方法的设计与验证
PeerJ. 2016 Jun 28;4:e2162. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2162. eCollection 2016.
9
Germline EMSY sequence alterations in hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer families.胚系 EMSY 序列改变与遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌家族相关。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jul 24;17(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3488-x.
10
Investigating the effects of additional truncating variants in DNA-repair genes on breast cancer risk in BRCA1-positive women.研究 DNA 修复基因中额外的截断变异对 BRCA1 阳性女性乳腺癌风险的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug 8;19(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5946-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-dimensional annotation of porcine variants using genomic and epigenomic features in pigs.利用猪的基因组和表观基因组特征对猪的变异进行多维度注释。
BMC Biol. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12915-025-02279-8.
2
Understanding genetic variants in context.在具体情境中理解基因变异
Elife. 2024 Dec 3;13:e88231. doi: 10.7554/eLife.88231.
3
Reducing uncertainty in genetic testing with Saturation Genome Editing.利用饱和基因组编辑降低基因检测中的不确定性。

本文引用的文献

1
Population genetic screening efficiently identifies carriers of autosomal dominant diseases.人群遗传筛查有效地识别常染色体显性疾病的携带者。
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1235-1239. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0982-5. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
2
Clinical outcomes of a genomic screening program for actionable genetic conditions.基因组筛查计划对可操作遗传条件的临床结果。
Genet Med. 2020 Nov;22(11):1874-1882. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0876-4. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
3
The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans.从 141456 名人类个体的变异中量化的突变约束谱。
Med Genet. 2022 Nov 29;34(4):297-304. doi: 10.1515/medgen-2022-2159. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Characterizing the pathogenicity of genetic variants: the consequences of context.表征基因变异的致病性:背景的影响。
NPJ Genom Med. 2024 Jan 9;9(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41525-023-00386-5.
5
An Atlas of Variant Effects to understand the genome at nucleotide resolution.变异效应图谱,深入解析基因组核苷酸分辨率。
Genome Biol. 2023 Jul 3;24(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-02986-x.
6
Clinical case study meets population cohort: identification of a BRCA1 pathogenic founder variant in Orcadians.临床病例研究与人群队列研究相结合:在奥克尼群岛人群中鉴定出 BRCA1 致病性种系变异。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 May;31(5):588-595. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01297-w. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
7
Saturation-scale functional evidence supports clinical variant interpretation in Lynch syndrome.饱和度功能证据支持林奇综合征的临床变异解释。
Genome Biol. 2022 Dec 22;23(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02839-z.
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):434-443. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7. Epub 2020 May 27.
4
Population Screening for Inherited Predisposition to Breast and Ovarian Cancer.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌易感性的人群筛查。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2020 Aug 31;21:373-412. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015253. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
5
Variant effect predictions capture some aspects of deep mutational scanning experiments.变异效应预测捕捉到了深度突变扫描实验的一些方面。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Mar 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3439-4.
6
Impact of proactive high-throughput functional assay data on BRCA1 variant interpretation in 3684 patients with breast or ovarian cancer.主动高通量功能测定数据对 3684 例乳腺癌或卵巢癌患者 BRCA1 变异解读的影响。
J Hum Genet. 2020 Mar;65(3):209-220. doi: 10.1038/s10038-019-0713-2. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
7
Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework.使用 ACMG/AMP 序列变异解读框架推荐功能证据 PS3/BS3 标准的应用。
Genome Med. 2019 Dec 31;12(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0690-2.
8
Exome sequencing reveals a high prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder variants in a diverse population-based biobank.外显子组测序揭示了一个多样化的基于人群的生物库中 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 种系变异的高流行率。
Genome Med. 2019 Dec 31;12(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0691-1.
9
Genomic screening and genomic diagnostic testing-two very different kettles of fish.基因组筛查和基因组诊断检测——截然不同的两码事。
Genome Med. 2019 Nov 27;11(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0696-9.
10
Assessment of blind predictions of the clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants.评估 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异的临床意义的盲法预测。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1546-1556. doi: 10.1002/humu.23861. Epub 2019 Aug 23.