• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异的临床意义的盲法预测。

Assessment of blind predictions of the clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants.

机构信息

Genomics Institute, UC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California.

FaBiT Department, Biocomputing Group, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1546-1556. doi: 10.1002/humu.23861. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1002/humu.23861
PMID:31294896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6744348/
Abstract

Testing for variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (commonly referred to as BRCA1/2), has emerged as a standard clinical practice and is helping countless women better understand and manage their heritable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Yet the increased rate of BRCA1/2 testing has led to an increasing number of Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS), and the rate of VUS discovery currently outpaces the rate of clinical variant interpretation. Computational prediction is a key component of the variant interpretation pipeline. In the CAGI5 ENIGMA Challenge, six prediction teams submitted predictions on 326 newly-interpreted variants from the ENIGMA Consortium. By evaluating these predictions against the new interpretations, we have gained a number of insights on the state of the art of variant prediction and specific steps to further advance this state of the art.

摘要

BRCA1 和 BRCA2(通常称为 BRCA1/2)的变异检测已经成为一种标准的临床实践,它帮助无数女性更好地了解和管理其遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险。然而,BRCA1/2 检测率的增加导致了越来越多的意义不确定的变异(VUS)的发现,目前 VUS 的发现率超过了临床变异解释的速度。计算预测是变异解释管道的关键组成部分。在 CAGI5 ENIGMA 挑战赛中,六个预测团队对 ENIGMA 联盟的 326 个新解释的变体提交了预测。通过将这些预测与新的解释进行评估,我们对变异预测的最新技术水平以及进一步提高这一技术水平的具体步骤有了一些深入的了解。

相似文献

1
Assessment of blind predictions of the clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants.评估 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异的临床意义的盲法预测。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1546-1556. doi: 10.1002/humu.23861. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
2
BRCA1- and BRCA2-specific in silico tools for variant interpretation in the CAGI 5 ENIGMA challenge.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 特异性的计算机工具,用于 CAGI 5 ENIGMA 挑战赛中的变体解释。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1593-1611. doi: 10.1002/humu.23802. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
3
BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance.BRCA1和BRCA2基因检测——处理临床意义不确定变异的陷阱与建议
Ann Oncol. 2015 Oct;26(10):2057-65. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv278. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
4
A Study on the Retrospective Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异的回顾性再阐释研究。
Clin Lab. 2024 Apr 1;70(4). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.230911.
5
Reclassification of and variants of uncertain significance: a multifactorial analysis of multicentre prospective cohort.多中心前瞻性队列的多因素分析:和意义不明变异体的重新分类。
J Med Genet. 2018 Dec;55(12):794-802. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105565. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
6
Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.采用 ACMG/AMP 2015 指南重新解读遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者中意义未明的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异。
Breast Cancer. 2019 Jul;26(4):510-519. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00951-w. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
7
Pathogenicity evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants identified in Portuguese breast/ovarian cancer families.葡萄牙乳腺癌/卵巢癌家系中鉴定的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 未分类变异体的致病性评估。
J Mol Diagn. 2014 May;16(3):324-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
8
A method to assess the clinical significance of unclassified variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes based on cancer family history.一种基于癌症家族史评估BRCA1和BRCA2基因中未分类变异临床意义的方法。
Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11(1):R8. doi: 10.1186/bcr2223. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
9
Performance of in silico prediction tools for the classification of rare BRCA1/2 missense variants in clinical diagnostics.用于临床诊断中罕见BRCA1/2错义变异分类的计算机预测工具的性能
BMC Med Genomics. 2018 Mar 27;11(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12920-018-0353-y.
10
BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants and missense polymorphisms in Algerian breast/ovarian cancer families.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 未分类变异体及错义多态性在阿尔及利亚乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中的研究。
Dis Markers. 2012;32(6):343-53. doi: 10.3233/DMA-2012-0893.

引用本文的文献

1
CAGI, the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation, establishes progress and prospects for computational genetic variant interpretation methods.CAGI,即基因组解读的关键评估,旨在评估计算遗传变异解读方法的进展和前景。
Genome Biol. 2024 Feb 22;25(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-03113-6.
2
A review of genetic variant databases and machine learning tools for predicting the pathogenicity of breast cancer.遗传变异数据库和机器学习工具在预测乳腺癌致病性方面的研究进展。
Brief Bioinform. 2023 Nov 22;25(1). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad479.
3
Gene-specific machine learning for pathogenicity prediction of rare BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants.

本文引用的文献

1
Inferring the molecular and phenotypic impact of amino acid variants with MutPred2.使用 MutPred2 推断氨基酸变异的分子和表型影响。
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 20;11(1):5918. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19669-x.
2
CAGI5: Objective performance assessments of predictions based on the Evolutionary Action equation.CAGI5:基于进化作用方程的预测的客观性能评估。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1436-1454. doi: 10.1002/humu.23873. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
3
Predicting pathogenicity of missense variants with weakly supervised regression.利用弱监督回归预测错义变异的致病性。
基于基因的机器学习在 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 错义变异致病性预测中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 28;13(1):10478. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37698-6.
4
Genome interpretation using in silico predictors of variant impact.使用变异影响的计算机预测因子进行基因组解读。
Hum Genet. 2022 Oct;141(10):1549-1577. doi: 10.1007/s00439-022-02457-6. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
5
Clinical validation of genomic functional screen data: Analysis of observed variants in an unselected population cohort.基因组功能筛选数据的临床验证:未选择人群队列中观察到的变异分析。
HGG Adv. 2022 Jan 8;3(2):100086. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100086. eCollection 2022 Apr 14.
6
Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 致病性预测的新型基于内表型策略:错义变体 HDR/SGE 测定结果的计算机建模。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jun 9;22(12):6226. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126226.
7
Variant effect predictions capture some aspects of deep mutational scanning experiments.变异效应预测捕捉到了深度突变扫描实验的一些方面。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Mar 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3439-4.
8
LEAP: Using machine learning to support variant classification in a clinical setting.LEAP:利用机器学习在临床环境中支持变异分类。
Hum Mutat. 2020 Jun;41(6):1079-1090. doi: 10.1002/humu.24011. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
9
Reports from the fifth edition of CAGI: The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation.来自第五版 CAGI 的报告:基因组解读的关键评估。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1197-1201. doi: 10.1002/humu.23876. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
10
CAGI5: Objective performance assessments of predictions based on the Evolutionary Action equation.CAGI5:基于进化作用方程的预测的客观性能评估。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1436-1454. doi: 10.1002/humu.23873. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1579-1592. doi: 10.1002/humu.23826. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
4
Large scale multifactorial likelihood quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: An ENIGMA resource to support clinical variant classification.大规模多因素似然定量分析 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变体:支持临床变异分类的 ENIGMA 资源。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1557-1578. doi: 10.1002/humu.23818.
5
BRCA1- and BRCA2-specific in silico tools for variant interpretation in the CAGI 5 ENIGMA challenge.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 特异性的计算机工具,用于 CAGI 5 ENIGMA 挑战赛中的变体解释。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1593-1611. doi: 10.1002/humu.23802. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
6
S-CAP extends pathogenicity prediction to genetic variants that affect RNA splicing.S-CAP 将致病性预测扩展到影响 RNA 剪接的遗传变异。
Nat Genet. 2019 Apr;51(4):755-763. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0348-4. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
7
BRCA Challenge: BRCA Exchange as a global resource for variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2.BRCA 挑战:BRCA 交换作为 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异的全球资源。
PLoS Genet. 2018 Dec 26;14(12):e1007752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007752. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
ClinVar at five years: Delivering on the promise.ClinVar 五年:兑现承诺。
Hum Mutat. 2018 Nov;39(11):1623-1630. doi: 10.1002/humu.23641.
9
BRCA Genetic Testing and Receipt of Preventive Interventions Among Women Aged 18-64 Years with Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Areas - United States, 2009-2014.2009 - 2014年美国非大都市和大都市地区18 - 64岁参加雇主赞助医疗保险的女性的BRCA基因检测及预防性干预措施的接受情况
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Sep 8;66(15):1-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6615a1.
10
Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因突变携带者的乳腺癌、卵巢癌和对侧乳腺癌风险。
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2402-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112.