Suppr超能文献

“纤维织炎”综合征

"Fibrositis" syndrome.

作者信息

Rice J R

出版信息

Med Clin North Am. 1986 Mar;70(2):455-68. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30963-4.

Abstract

There appears to be as yet undefined but significant and possibly multifactorial elements of personality, stress, or depression in the manifestations and possibly the pathogenesis of FS. If these factors, perhaps amplified by the neurophysiologic effects of disturbed sleep, produce a neurochemical disturbance in CNS function, and if this perturbation includes a reduction or impairment of function involving the pain-modulation pathways, then a simple and perhaps compelling explanation for the experience of pain in FS becomes apparent. Reduced midbrain/brainstem inhibition of ascending nociceptive impulses would clearly explain the finding of tender points in normal-appearing areas of the body, as well as the lack of segmental distribution of discomfort in FS. Local anesthetics, injected peripherally into tender points, would be expected, as is the case, to block pain and tenderness in the local area for the duration of action of the agent used. Analgesics with peripheral activity, such as aspirin and NSAIDs, are relatively ineffective in treating FS, and would be predictably so in a disorder involving reduced central pain inhibition as opposed to increased peripheral nociceptive input. It would not be surprising to find that centrally acting agents, particularly those producing enhancement of serotonergic neurons such as amitriptyline, would provide substantial or total pain relief as well as improvement in mood in a significant number of patients. Most importantly, this concept would highlight the real pain experienced by these patients and the obligation of involved physicians to appropriately diagnose and treat this common pain syndrome. Avoiding excessive conjecture, it is then permissible at the present time to conclude that: FS is a characteristic, clinically common pain syndrome in which aspects of the pain itself appear to be of physiologic origin. Although stress or inherent personality traits may play a role in FS, the relative uniformity in symptomatology virtually excludes conversion hysteria as a major factor in this disorder. The lack of evidence for a disturbance in muscle, fascia, and other soft tissues in FS, the lack of adequate response to NSAIDs, and the frequent response to TCAs suggest that specific dysfunction of the CNS may play a major role in the symptomatology of this entity. Impaired function of the pain-modulation system, located anatomically in the midbrain and brainstem, provides a plausible explanation for the pain and finding of tender points in FS, as well as a potentially rational basis for therapy.

摘要

在纤维肌痛(FS)的表现以及可能的发病机制中,似乎存在尚未明确但很重要且可能是多因素的人格、压力或抑郁因素。如果这些因素,可能因睡眠障碍的神经生理效应而被放大,在中枢神经系统(CNS)功能中产生神经化学紊乱,并且如果这种扰动包括涉及疼痛调节通路的功能降低或受损,那么对于FS中疼痛体验的一个简单且可能令人信服的解释就显而易见了。中脑/脑干对上行伤害性冲动的抑制作用减弱,显然可以解释在身体外观正常区域出现压痛点的现象,以及FS中不适缺乏节段性分布的情况。正如实际发生的那样,将局部麻醉剂外周注射到压痛点,预计会在所用药物的作用持续时间内阻断局部区域的疼痛和压痛。具有外周活性的镇痛药,如阿司匹林和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),在治疗FS方面相对无效,并且在一种涉及中枢性疼痛抑制降低而非外周伤害性输入增加的疾病中,其效果不佳是可预见的。发现作用于中枢的药物,特别是那些能增强血清素能神经元的药物,如阿米替林,能为大量患者提供实质性或完全的疼痛缓解以及情绪改善,这并不奇怪。最重要的是,这个概念将凸显这些患者所经历的真实疼痛,以及相关医生对正确诊断和治疗这种常见疼痛综合征的责任。在避免过度推测的情况下,目前可以得出以下结论:FS是一种典型的、临床上常见的疼痛综合征,其中疼痛本身的某些方面似乎源于生理因素。虽然压力或内在人格特质可能在FS中起作用,但症状学上的相对一致性实际上排除了转换性癔症作为该疾病主要因素的可能性。FS中缺乏肌肉、筋膜和其他软组织紊乱的证据,对NSAIDs反应不足,以及对三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)的频繁反应表明,中枢神经系统的特定功能障碍可能在该疾病的症状学中起主要作用。解剖学上位于中脑和脑干的疼痛调节系统功能受损,为FS中的疼痛和压痛点的发现提供了一个合理的解释,以及一个潜在的合理治疗基础。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验