Thomas Emma E, Taylor Monica L, Ward Elizabeth C, Hwang Rita, Cook Renee, Ross Julie-Anne, Webb Clare, Harris Michael, Hartley Carina, Carswell Phillip, Burns Clare L, Caffery Liam J
Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Apr;30(3):559-569. doi: 10.1177/1357633X221074499. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
As COVID-19 restrictions reduce globally, services will determine what components of care will continue via telehealth. We aimed to determine the clinician, service, and system level factors that influence sustained use of telehealth and develop a framework to enhance sustained use where appropriate.
This study was conducted across 16 allied health departments over four health service facilities (Brisbane, Australia). It used a multi-method observational study design, involving telehealth service activity data from hospital administrative databases and qualitative interviews with allied health staff (n = 80). Data were integrated and analysed using Greenhalgh's framework.
Increased telehealth use during the peak COVID period reverted to in-person activity as restrictions eased. Telehealth is unlikely to be sustained without a clear strategy including determination of roles and responsibilities across the organisation. Clinician resistance due to forced adoption remains a key issue. The main motivator for clinicians to use telehealth was improved consumer-centred care. Benefits beyond this are needed to sustain telehealth and improvements are required to make the telehealth experience seamless for providers and recipients. Data were synthesised into a comprehensive framework that can be used as a blueprint for system-wide improvements and service enhancement or redesign.
Sustainability of telehealth activity beyond the peak COVID period is unlikely without implementation strategies to address consumer, clinician, service, and system factors. The framework can inform how these strategies can be enacted. Whilst developed for allied health disciplines, it is likely applicable to other disciplines.
随着全球范围内新冠疫情限制措施的减少,各医疗机构将决定哪些医疗服务环节将通过远程医疗继续开展。我们旨在确定影响远程医疗持续使用的临床医生、服务和系统层面的因素,并制定一个框架,以便在适当情况下加强持续使用。
本研究在澳大利亚布里斯班的四个医疗服务机构的16个联合健康部门进行。采用多方法观察性研究设计,涉及医院行政数据库中的远程医疗服务活动数据以及对联合健康工作人员(n = 80)的定性访谈。使用格林哈尔希框架对数据进行整合和分析。
随着限制措施的放松,新冠疫情高峰期增加的远程医疗使用又恢复为面对面诊疗活动。如果没有明确的策略,包括确定整个组织内的角色和职责,远程医疗不太可能持续下去。因强制采用而导致的临床医生抵触情绪仍然是一个关键问题。临床医生使用远程医疗的主要动机是以患者为中心的护理得到改善。要维持远程医疗,还需要其他益处,并且需要进行改进,以使远程医疗体验对提供者和接受者来说都无缝衔接。数据被综合成一个全面的框架,可作为全系统改进、服务增强或重新设计的蓝图。
如果没有解决消费者、临床医生、服务和系统因素的实施策略,新冠疫情高峰期之后远程医疗活动的可持续性不太可能实现。该框架可以为如何制定这些策略提供参考。虽然是为联合健康学科制定的,但可能适用于其他学科。