• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Beyond inclusion: Enacting team equity in precision medicine research.超越包容:在精准医学研究中实现团队公平。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 7;17(2):e0263750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263750. eCollection 2022.
2
Interrogating the Value of Return of Results for Diverse Populations: Perspectives from Precision Medicine Researchers.探究不同人群结果回报的价值:精准医学研究人员的观点。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):108-119. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2279965. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
The Precision Medicine Nation.精准医学国家
Hastings Cent Rep. 2017 Jul;47(4):19-29. doi: 10.1002/hast.736.
4
The Use of Racial Categories in Precision Medicine Research.种族类别在精准医学研究中的应用。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Dec 12;29(Suppl 3):651-658. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S3.651. eCollection 2019.
5
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Summary: Enhancing Opportunities for Training and Retention of a Diverse Biomedical Workforce.美国国立心肺血液研究所研讨会总结:增加培训机会并留住多元化生物医学人才队伍。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Apr;13(4):562-7. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-624OT.
6
How Can Law Support Development of Genomics and Precision Medicine to Advance Health Equity and Reduce Disparities?法律如何支持基因组学和精准医学的发展,以促进健康公平,减少差距?
Ethn Dis. 2019 Dec 12;29(Suppl 3):623-628. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S3.623. eCollection 2019.
7
Strategies for moving towards equity in recruitment of rural and Aboriginal research participants.在招募农村和原住民研究参与者方面实现公平的策略。
Rural Remote Health. 2013 Apr-Jun;13(2):2453. Epub 2013 May 18.
8
Including the blind community in precision medicine research: findings from a national survey and recommendations.将盲人社区纳入精准医学研究中:一项全国性调查的结果和建议。
Genet Med. 2019 Nov;21(11):2631-2638. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0533-y. Epub 2019 May 16.
9
The need for an intersectionality framework in precision medicine research.精准医学研究中对交叉性框架的需求。
Am J Hum Genet. 2023 Oct 5;110(10):1609-1615. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.08.013.
10
Strategies of inclusion: The tradeoffs of pursuing "baked in" diversity through place-based recruitment.包容策略:通过基于地点的招聘追求“内在”多样性的权衡。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Aug;306:115132. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115132. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study of diversity in precision medicine research: The development and stakeholder assessment of a Diversity Decision Map.精准医学研究中的多样性定性研究:多样性决策图的开发与利益相关者评估
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar 18;9(1):e78. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.45. eCollection 2025.
2
Breaking research silos to achieve equitable precision medicine in rheumatology.打破研究壁垒,实现风湿病学领域的公平精准医疗。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2025 Feb;21(2):98-110. doi: 10.1038/s41584-024-01204-7. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
3
Research for all: building a diverse researcher community for the All of Us Research Program.为所有人开展研究:为“我们所有人研究计划”建立多元化的研究人员群体。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jan 1;32(1):38-50. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae270.
4
The ethical challenges of diversifying genomic data: A qualitative evidence synthesis.基因组数据多样化的伦理挑战:一项定性证据综合分析。
Camb Prism Precis Med. 2023 Sep 12;2:e1. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.20. eCollection 2024.
5
Community Engagement Strategies for Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Populations.针对代表性不足的种族和族裔群体的社区参与策略
Mayo Clin Proc. 2024 Jan;99(1):159-171. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.015.
6
National Couples' Health and Time Study: Sample, Design, and Weighting.全国夫妻健康与时间研究:样本、设计与加权
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023 Aug;42(4). doi: 10.1007/s11113-023-09799-7. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
7
Extending an Antiracism Lens to the Implementation of Precision Public Health Interventions.将反种族主义视角扩展到精准公共卫生干预措施的实施中。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Nov;113(11):1210-1218. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307386. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
8
Community Engagement in Precision Medicine Research: Organizational Practices and Their Impacts for Equity.社区参与精准医学研究:组织实践及其对公平的影响。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2023;14(4):185-196. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2201478. Epub 2023 May 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Affirming NIH's commitment to addressing structural racism in the biomedical research enterprise.美国国立卫生研究院承诺致力于解决生物医学研究领域的结构性种族主义问题。
Cell. 2021 Jun 10;184(12):3075-3079. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.014.
2
Fund Black scientists.资助黑人科学家。
Cell. 2021 Feb 4;184(3):561-565. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
3
The genomics workforce must become more diverse: a strategic imperative.基因组学劳动力必须更加多样化:这是一项战略要务。
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Jan 7;108(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.12.013.
4
Revising the a Priori Hypothesis: Systemic Racism Has Penetrated Scientific Funding.修正先验假设:系统性种族主义已渗透科学资金。
Cell. 2020 Oct 29;183(3):576-579. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.026.
5
Strategic vision for improving human health at The Forefront of Genomics.基因组学前沿改善人类健康的战略愿景。
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7831):683-692. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2817-4. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
Systemic racism in higher education.高等教育中的系统性种族主义。
Science. 2020 Sep 18;369(6510):1440-1441. doi: 10.1126/science.abd7140.
7
The Diversity-Innovation Paradox in Science.科学中的多样性-创新悖论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 28;117(17):9284-9291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915378117. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
8
Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists.课题选择导致美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)授予非裔美国/黑人科学家的奖项较少。
Sci Adv. 2019 Oct 9;5(10):eaaw7238. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw7238. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Ethics of inclusion: Cultivate trust in precision medicine.纳入伦理:培养对精准医学的信任。
Science. 2019 Jun 7;364(6444):941-942. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8299.
10
Underrepresented faculty play a disproportionate role in advancing diversity and inclusion.代表性不足的教职员工在推进多样性和包容性方面发挥了不成比例的作用。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jul;3(7):1030-1033. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0911-5. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

超越包容:在精准医学研究中实现团队公平。

Beyond inclusion: Enacting team equity in precision medicine research.

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Department of Sociology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Feb 7;17(2):e0263750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263750. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0263750
PMID:35130331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8820610/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify meanings of and challenges to enacting equitable diversification of genomics research, and specifically precision medicine research (PMR), teams.

METHODS

We conducted in-depth interviews with 102 individuals involved in three U.S.-based precision medicine research consortia and conducted over 400 observation hours of their working group meetings, consortium-wide meetings, and conference presentations. We also reviewed published reports on genomic workforce diversity (WFD), particularly those relevant to the PMR community.

RESULTS

Our study finds that many PMR teams encounter challenges as they strive to achieve equitable diversification on scientific teams. Interviewees articulated that underrepresented team members were often hired to increase the study's capacity to recruit diverse research participants, but are limited to on-the-ground staff positions with little influence over study design. We find existing hierarchies and power structures in the academic research ecosystem compound challenges for equitable diversification.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that meaningful diversification of PMR teams will only be possible when team equity is prioritized as a core value in academic research communities.

摘要

目的

确定实施基因组学研究(尤其是精准医学研究(PMR)团队)公平多样化的意义和挑战。

方法

我们对参与三个美国精准医学研究联盟的 102 名个人进行了深入访谈,并对他们的工作组会议、联盟全体会议和会议演讲进行了 400 多个小时的观察。我们还审查了有关基因组劳动力多样性(WFD)的已发表报告,特别是与 PMR 社区相关的报告。

结果

我们的研究发现,许多 PMR 团队在努力实现科学团队公平多样化方面遇到了挑战。受访者表示,代表性不足的团队成员通常是为了增加研究招募不同研究参与者的能力而被雇用的,但他们只能担任实地工作人员,对研究设计的影响有限。我们发现,学术研究生态系统中现有的等级制度和权力结构加剧了公平多样化的挑战。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,只有当学术研究社区将团队公平性作为核心价值观优先考虑时,PMR 团队的真正多样化才有可能实现。