Department of Communication in Healthcare, Nivel, Netherlands institute for health services research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Jul 26;24(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04563-6.
Half of all patients with cancer use complementary medicine. Given the benefits and risks associated with complementary medicine use, contact between complementary medicine practitioners and conventional healthcare providers (oncologists, nurses) is important for monitoring the health and well-being of mutual patients with cancer. Research on occurrence of such interprofessional contact is scarce. This study aims to describe complementary medicine practitioners' experiences with contact with conventional healthcare providers about mutual patients with cancer and the importance they attach to patient disclosure of complementary medicine use to their conventional healthcare provider. Predictors for interprofessional contact are explored.
An online survey was administered among complementary medicine practitioners who treat patients with cancer or cancer survivors and who are member of a professional association in the Netherlands.
The survey was completed by 1481 complementary medicine practitioners. 40% of the participants reported to have contact with conventional healthcare providers of patients with cancer. Only 13% of the complementary medicine practitioners experienced conventional healthcare providers as open to communication with them. An explorative logistic regression showed that openness of conventional healthcare providers as experienced by complementary medicine practitioners was the most important predictor for the occurrence of interprofessional contact (OR = 8.12, 95% CI 5.12-12.86, p < .001). Most complementary medicine practitioners (82%) considered it important that patients disclose complementary medicine use to their conventional healthcare provider and 49% of the participants always motivates their patients to do so.
Interprofessional contact with conventional healthcare providers in oncology occurs but is not routine for most complementary medicine practitioners. More than one-third of the surveyed complementary medicine practitioners experienced conventional healthcare providers as not open to communication with them. The openness of conventional healthcare providers as experienced by complementary practitioners is an important predictor for interprofessional contact to take place. Most complementary practitioners acknowledge the importance of patient disclosure of complementary medicine use to their conventional healthcare provider. Open communication about the topic of complementary medicine use between complementary practitioners, conventional healthcare providers and patients prevents overlooking relevant medical information and facilitates optimal monitoring of health and safety of patients with cancer.
一半的癌症患者会使用补充医学。鉴于补充医学使用带来的益处和风险,补充医学从业者与常规医疗保健提供者(肿瘤医生、护士)之间的接触对于监测共同的癌症患者的健康和福祉非常重要。关于这种跨专业接触的研究很少。本研究旨在描述补充医学从业者与常规医疗保健提供者接触共同的癌症患者的经验,以及他们对患者向常规医疗保健提供者披露补充医学使用情况的重视程度。探讨了跨专业接触的预测因素。
对荷兰专业协会的癌症患者或癌症幸存者的补充医学从业者进行了在线调查。
共有 1481 名补充医学从业者完成了调查。40%的参与者报告与癌症患者的常规医疗保健提供者有过接触。只有 13%的补充医学从业者认为常规医疗保健提供者愿意与他们沟通。探索性逻辑回归显示,补充医学从业者所经历的常规医疗保健提供者的开放性是跨专业接触发生的最重要预测因素(OR=8.12,95%CI 5.12-12.86,p<0.001)。大多数补充医学从业者(82%)认为患者向常规医疗保健提供者披露补充医学使用情况很重要,有 49%的参与者总是鼓励他们的患者这样做。
与肿瘤学中的常规医疗保健提供者进行跨专业接触是存在的,但对大多数补充医学从业者来说并非常规。超过三分之一的被调查补充医学从业者认为常规医疗保健提供者不愿意与他们沟通。补充从业者所经历的常规医疗保健提供者的开放性是跨专业接触发生的一个重要预测因素。大多数补充从业者承认患者向常规医疗保健提供者披露补充医学使用情况的重要性。补充从业者、常规医疗保健提供者和患者之间就补充医学使用问题进行开放沟通,可以避免遗漏相关的医疗信息,并有助于优化癌症患者的健康和安全监测。