School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, Viale dell'Ateneo Lucano 10, Potenza, 85100, Italy.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari, Via Marengo 2, Cagliari, 09123, Italy.
Environ Res. 2022 Jun;209:112873. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112873. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
2019 Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) had a big impact in Italy, mainly concentrated in the northern part of the Country. All this was mainly due to similarities of this area with Wuhan in Hubei Province, according to geographical, environmental and socio-economic points of view. The basic hypothesis of this research was that the presence of atmospheric pollutants can generate stress on health conditions of the population and determine pre-conditions for the development of diseases of the respiratory system and complications related to them. In most cases the attention on environmental aspects is mainly concentrated on pollution, neglecting issues such as land management which, in some way, can contribute to reducing the impact of pollution. The reduction of land take and the decrease in the loss of ecosystem services can represent an important aspect in improving environmental quality. In order to integrate policies for environmental change and human health, the main factors analyzed in this paper can be summarized in environmental, climatic and land management. The main aim of this paper was to produce three different hazard scenarios respectively related to environmental, climatic and land management-related factors. A Spatial Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method has been applied over thirteen informative layers grouped in aggregation classes of environmental, climatic and land management. The results of the health hazard maps show a disparity in the distribution of territorial responses to the pandemic in Italy. The environmental components play an extremely relevant role in the definition of the red zones of hazard, with a consequent urgent need to renew sustainable development strategies. The comparison of hazard maps related to different scenarios provides decision makers with tools to orient policy choices with a different degree of priority according to a place-based approach. In particular, the geospatial representation of risks could be a tool for legitimizing the measures chosen by decision-makers, proposing a renewed approach that highlights and takes account of the differences between the spatial contexts to be considered - Regions, Provinces, Municipalities - also in terms of climatic and environmental variables.
2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 在意大利造成了重大影响,主要集中在该国北部。从地理、环境和社会经济角度来看,这主要是由于该地区与湖北省武汉市有相似之处。本研究的基本假设是,大气污染物的存在会对人口健康状况造成压力,并为呼吸系统疾病及其相关并发症的发展创造先决条件。在大多数情况下,对环境方面的关注主要集中在污染上,而忽略了土地管理等问题,而土地管理在某种程度上可以有助于减少污染的影响。减少土地占用和减少生态系统服务的损失可以成为改善环境质量的一个重要方面。为了整合环境变化和人类健康政策,本文主要分析的因素可以概括为环境、气候和土地管理。本文的主要目的是分别生成与环境、气候和土地管理相关因素相关的三个不同的危害情景。空间分析层次过程 (AHP) 方法已应用于十三个信息层,这些信息层分为环境、气候和土地管理的聚合类。健康危害图的结果显示,意大利各地对大流行的反应分布存在差异。环境因素在危险的红色区域定义中起着极其重要的作用,因此迫切需要更新可持续发展战略。不同情景的危害图的比较为决策者提供了根据基于地点的方法以不同优先程度选择政策选择的工具。特别是,风险的地理空间表示可以成为决策者选择的措施的合法化工具,提出一种新的方法,突出和考虑要考虑的空间背景之间的差异 - 地区、省、市 - 也包括气候和环境变量。