• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在信息疫情中寻找事实:为有效传递 COVID-19 信息进行框架设计,使人们能够接触到权威内容。

Finding the facts in an infodemic: framing effective COVID-19 messages to connect people to authoritative content.

机构信息

Digital Health and Innovation, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland

Digital Health and Innovation, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Feb;7(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007582.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007582
PMID:35131808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8829835/
Abstract

The public's need for timely and trusted COVID-19 information remains high. Governments and global health agencies such as the WHO have sought to disseminate accurate and timely information to counteract misinformation and disinformation that has arisen as part of an 'infodemic'-the overabundance of information on COVID-19-some accurate and some not. In early 2020, WHO began a collaboration with Google to run online public service announcements on COVID-19, in the form of search ads displayed above results of Google Search queries. Web-based text ads can drive online searchers of COVID-19 information to authoritative COVID-19 content but determining what message is most effective is a challenge. WHO wanted to understand which message framing, that is, the way in which ad information is worded for the public, leads searchers to click through to WHO content. WHO tested 71 text ads in English across four COVID-19 topics using a mix of message frames: descriptive, collective, gain, loss, appeals to values and emphasising reasons. Between 11 September 2020 and 23 November 2020, there were 13 million views of the experimental WHO text ads leading to 1.4 million click-throughs to the WHO website. Within the set of 71 ads, there was a large spread between the most effective and least effective messages; for messages on COVID-19, the best performing framings were more than twice as effective as the worst performing framings (18.7% vs 8.5% engagement rate). Health practitioners can apply the messaging tactics WHO found to be successful to rapidly optimise messages for their own public health campaigns and better reach the public with authoritative information. Similar collaboration between big technology companies and governments and global health agencies has the potential to advance public health.

摘要

公众对及时、可信的 COVID-19 信息的需求仍然很高。各国政府和全球卫生机构(如世界卫生组织)一直试图传播准确、及时的信息,以对抗作为“信息疫情”的一部分出现的错误信息和虚假信息,这些信息过多地涉及 COVID-19,有些是准确的,有些则不是。2020 年初,世卫组织开始与谷歌合作,通过谷歌搜索查询结果上方的搜索广告形式发布有关 COVID-19 的在线公益服务公告。基于网络的文字广告可以引导 COVID-19 信息的在线搜索者访问权威的 COVID-19 内容,但确定哪种信息最有效是一个挑战。世卫组织希望了解哪种信息框架,即广告信息对公众的措辞方式,会促使搜索者点击世卫组织的内容。世卫组织在四个 COVID-19 主题中用英语测试了 71 个文字广告,使用了混合信息框架:描述性、集体性、收益、损失、诉诸价值观和强调原因。在 2020 年 9 月 11 日至 11 月 23 日期间,这些实验性的世卫组织文字广告共被浏览了 1300 万次,点击量达 140 万次,链接到世卫组织的网站。在这 71 个广告中,最有效的和最无效的广告之间存在很大的差异;在 COVID-19 相关的广告中,表现最好的框架的效果是表现最差的框架的两倍多(参与率为 18.7%对 8.5%)。卫生专业人员可以应用世卫组织发现的成功的信息策略,迅速优化其自己的公共卫生宣传信息,并用权威信息更好地接触公众。大型科技公司与政府和全球卫生机构之间的类似合作有可能促进公共卫生。

相似文献

1
Finding the facts in an infodemic: framing effective COVID-19 messages to connect people to authoritative content.在信息疫情中寻找事实:为有效传递 COVID-19 信息进行框架设计,使人们能够接触到权威内容。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Feb;7(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007582.
2
Framework for Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Methods and Results of an Online, Crowdsourced WHO Technical Consultation.管理新冠疫情信息疫情的框架:世卫组织在线众包技术磋商会的方法与结果
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 26;22(6):e19659. doi: 10.2196/19659.
3
Effective Infodemic Management: A Substantive Article of the Pandemic Accord.有效信息疫情管理:大流行协定的实质性条款。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Sep 20;3:e51760. doi: 10.2196/51760.
4
A Stanford Conference on Social Media, Ethics, and COVID-19 Misinformation (INFODEMIC): Qualitative Thematic Analysis.斯坦福社交媒体、伦理与 COVID-19 错误信息会议(INFODEMIC):定性主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 15;24(2):e35707. doi: 10.2196/35707.
5
A Comprehensive Analysis of COVID-19 Misinformation, Public Health Impacts, and Communication Strategies: Scoping Review.全面分析新冠病毒错误信息、公共卫生影响和传播策略:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 21;26:e56931. doi: 10.2196/56931.
6
Infodemic, Misinformation and Disinformation in Pandemics: Scientific Landscape and the Road Ahead for Public Health Informatics Research.大流行中的信息疫情、错误信息和虚假信息:公共卫生信息学研究的科学格局和未来道路。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:764-768. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210278.
7
The Use of Travel as an Appeal to Motivate Millennial Parents on Facebook to Get Vaccinated Against COVID-19: Message Framing Evaluation.利用旅行作为吸引千禧一代父母在脸书上接种新冠疫苗的动机:信息框架评估
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 1;7:e43720. doi: 10.2196/43720.
8
Chatbot-Delivered COVID-19 Vaccine Communication Message Preferences of Young Adults and Public Health Workers in Urban American Communities: Qualitative Study.城市美国家庭中青年人和公共卫生工作者对聊天机器人推送的 COVID-19 疫苗沟通信息的偏好:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 6;24(7):e38418. doi: 10.2196/38418.
9
Social Media, Public Health, and Community Mitigation of COVID-19: Challenges, Risks, and Benefits.社交媒体、公共卫生和社区对 COVID-19 的缓解:挑战、风险和益处。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 12;24(4):e36804. doi: 10.2196/36804.
10
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 Public Health Communication on X (Formerly Twitter): Cross-Sectional Study of Message Type, Sentiment, and Source.关于X(原推特)上的新冠疫情公共卫生传播:信息类型、情感倾向及来源的横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 19;9:e59687. doi: 10.2196/59687.
2
How Authoritative Media and Personal Social Media Influence Policy Compliance Through Trust in Government and Risk Perception: Quantitative Cross-Sectional Survey Study.权威媒体和个人社交媒体如何通过对政府的信任和风险认知影响政策合规性:定量横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 20;27:e64940. doi: 10.2196/64940.
3
Using wiki surveys to rapidly test messages promoting COVID-19 vaccination boosters and child vaccination among Philadelphia residents.利用维基调查快速测试在费城居民中推广 COVID-19 疫苗加强针和儿童疫苗接种的信息。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 23;14(1):19611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70554-9.
4
Don't Hesitate to Vaccinate-The Safety of Covid-19 Vaccination and Epilepsy.不要犹豫接种新冠疫苗——新冠疫苗接种与癫痫的安全性
Epilepsy Curr. 2022 Nov 28;23(1):18-19. doi: 10.1177/15357597221135964. eCollection 2023 Jan-Feb.
5
A scoping review of digital health interventions for combating COVID-19 misinformation and disinformation.针对 COVID-19 错误信息和虚假信息的数字健康干预措施的范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Mar 16;30(4):752-760. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad005.
6
Age Differences in Preferred Methods of Obtaining and Understanding Health Related Information During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia.澳大利亚 COVID-19 大流行期间不同年龄段获取和理解健康相关信息的首选方法差异。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 13;10:912188. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.912188. eCollection 2022.
7
When do persuasive messages on vaccine safety steer COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and recommendations? Behavioural insights from a randomised controlled experiment in Malaysia.当有关疫苗安全性的说服性信息引导 COVID-19 疫苗的接受和推荐时会发生什么?来自马来西亚随机对照试验的行为洞察。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jul;7(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009250.

本文引用的文献

1
What influences people's responses to public health messages for managing risks and preventing infectious diseases? A rapid systematic review of the evidence and recommendations.哪些因素影响人们对管理风险和预防传染病的公共卫生信息的反应?对证据和建议的快速系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e048750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048750.
2
Novel strategies to support global promotion of COVID-19 vaccination.支持全球推广 COVID-19 疫苗接种的新策略。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Oct;6(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006066.
3
The readability of official public health information on COVID-19.关于新冠疫情的官方公共卫生信息的可读性。
Med J Aust. 2021 Oct 18;215(8):373-375. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51282. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
4
When Vaccine Apathy, Not Hesitancy, Drives Vaccine Disinterest.当是疫苗冷漠而非犹豫导致对疫苗不感兴趣时。
JAMA. 2021 Jun 22;325(24):2435-2436. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7707.
5
Institutional and behaviour-change interventions to support COVID-19 public health measures: a review by the Lancet Commission Task Force on public health measures to suppress the pandemic.支持 COVID-19 公共卫生措施的机构和行为改变干预措施:柳叶刀委员会公共卫生措施工作组对抑制大流行的评估。
Int Health. 2021 Sep 3;13(5):399-409. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihab022.
6
Framing Messages to Deal With the COVID-19 Crisis: The Role of Loss/Gain Frames and Content.构建应对新冠疫情危机的信息框架:损失/收益框架及内容的作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 28;12:568212. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.568212. eCollection 2021.
7
Beyond Politics - Promoting Covid-19 Vaccination in the United States.超越政治——在美国推广新冠疫苗接种
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 18;384(7):e23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2033790. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online experiment.在 COVID-19 大流行期间激励社会隔离:一项在线实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113478. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113478. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
9
The use of the PARIHS framework in implementation research and practice-a citation analysis of the literature.PARIHS 框架在实施研究和实践中的应用——文献引文分析。
Implement Sci. 2020 Aug 27;15(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01003-0.
10
Harnessing behavioural science in public health campaigns to maintain 'social distancing' in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: key principles.在应对新冠疫情的公共卫生运动中运用行为科学以保持“社交距离”:关键原则
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Aug;74(8):617-619. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214290. Epub 2020 May 8.